Fahrenheit $911

Fahrenheit $911

: The Wall Street Journal reports that big profits from Fahrenheit 9/11 will go to charity. It’s not because Michael Moore is a generous liberal. Ha! That’s a good one. No, in this wonderfully byzantine tale, it’s because Disney wanted to punish the Weinstein brothers. The Journal explains why charities yet to be picked — by Disney — will get up to 40 percent of the take:

According to people familiar with the matter, the media company was determined to punish the brothers for their alleged bad behavior by limiting the extent to which the Weinsteins could benefit.

In essence, Disney refused to sell the film to the brothers unless they agreed that they would not benefit personally any more than they would have under their employment agreement. That is still a lot of money: Under that complex deal, the Weinsteins typically pocket about 40% of the net profit from any Miramax picture, after the costs of distribution, prints and advertising and talent participations are deducted. But people close to the deal say that Disney demanded that the remaining 60% go to a charity or charities of its choice.

: Dear Disney, Michael Moore, and the Weinsteins,

A wag might suggest that the money be donated to the Bush campaign just for the value of the punchline. But I have a far better suggestion:

I urge you to donate this money to Spirit of America to benefit the people of Iraq.

If you care so much about the victims of the Bush war, as you see it, then, Mr. Moore, put some pressure on: Put Disney’s money where your mouth is and benefit these people.

And you might want to throw in a few of the gazillion bucks you’re making on your flick, too.

Thank you.

18 responses to “Fahrenheit $911”

  1. Jake Avatar

    Any bets on how long it takes to have Moore turn this into his own personal stroke of charity PR genius? Any guess I’d put forth would be in increments of milliseconds….

  2. apex Avatar

    Or…. give it to the Bush campaign :-)

  3. Retread Avatar
    Retread

    I think this is a great idea. But I think Disney, Moore, et al will find some objection to donating to SoA, not left wing enough, for Moore anyway.

  4. Andy Avatar

    Looks like they shoulda cut the deal before screaming “censorship”. Disney/Eisner might have been more open handed if they hadn’t been used.
    Does the “game” quit being fun when we know so many details about how it’s rigged for public consumption? Do we loose a sense of outrage when we learn the manipulation and tactics?
    It feels like watching a magician after we have learned how the trick is done. We no longer care about the trick and start to judge the skill at deception and misdirection.
    When will Howard fall into this same category?
    When will MacAuliffe fall into it as well?
    We have the “Distraction Campaign” working so well that we hardly know Kerry. We know whe he dislikes about Bush. We do not know what he standas for, what he approves and disapproves on issues, we don’t know why he wants to be President, we don’t know why he has not enacted any legislation to cure the stump speech problems these past 20 years… If he appoints Hillary as VP then he will slip below the radar again. She will take the spotlight and he will get a free pass. Win or Lose she gets great exposure and experience at running a national campaign in her own name.
    Too much examination of the mechanics and not enough appreciation of the spectacle? Probably.

  5. freddie po Avatar
    freddie po

    It aways amuses me that when anyone has or makes money, those without as much, or who “live” on the other side of the political spectrum must bable about what ought to be done with the money ec etc-Example: knocking the Kery fortunes while ignoring the oil wealth of the Bush family etc
    More a genius, like it or not, at using the system to make money.live with it.

  6. Dave D Avatar

    Show me one person who’s ignored the fact that the Bush family is wealthy, Nimrod. That’s one of the main conceits of Moore’s movie: President Bush and his family as much as allowed 9/11 to happen (or at least facilitated certain aspects of it) in order to protect oil interests from which they could profit.

  7. djangone Avatar
    djangone

    Hey, has the general tone lifted, or are the wingnuts asleep? Not one comment on using his money to buy twinkies / cheetos / liposuction / stomach stapling. I’m so disappointed.
    The ‘Ha’ to Moore being a generous liberal is an unwarranted slap. And look, if he gives it overseas he opens himself up to charges of caring more about other countries than his own; if he gives locally, he opens himself up to charges of not caring about that kid on the Baghdad playground slide.
    So the answer? He’ll be giving to Flint. Forget the conundrum. It’s going right back home (no, not the Upper West Side home, the home he depicts in every movie).
    Now, why don’t we stop speculating and wait for some actual news of what he actually does. Disney? Does anyone really care? It’s always about Mike here, driving up those comment counts.

  8. Alice Avatar

    I think Spirit of America is a fabulous idea.

  9. pqd332 Avatar
    pqd332

    The money should be disbused among the many bloggers who have tirelessly catalogued the willful distortions in F 911.

  10.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    How much of the money Mel Gibson made on the crucifixion of Christ went to charity? Just curious….

  11. Easycure Avatar

    If Disney didn’t own ESPN, I’d never watch them again…..

  12. Roger L. Simon Avatar

    Very funny, Jeff. You realize that this is the same Michael Moore who wouldn’t even let the writers on his television show unionize. And you think he’d donate money to poor Iraqis?

  13. Marc Danziger Avatar

    So, Rodger – know anyone at Disney?
    Marc

  14. Kevin Murphy Avatar

    They’ll probably give it to Handgun Control

  15. lk Avatar

    The benfeit for the people of Iraq is covered. What’s the tab, 87 billion and climbing, or so?

  16. Alice Avatar

    Easycure: My sister once tried to boycott Disney. She basically couldn’t buy groceries at her local store, turn on the TV, or pick up a magazine. Not that I’m discouraging you from trying. I think corporations should be made small enough to boycott with ease.

  17. Alice Avatar

    lk: Are you saying that after supporting Hussein when convenient for us, on the parts of both Democrats and Rupublicans by the way, that we don’t owe it to them? As a good liberal, I say we do.

  18. Mike NYC Avatar
    Mike NYC

    Moore’s Public Service
    By PAUL KRUGMAN
    Since it opened, “Fahrenheit 9/11” has been a hit in both blue and red America, even at theaters close to military bases. Last Saturday, Dale Earnhardt Jr. took his Nascar crew to see it. The film’s appeal to working-class Americans, who are the true victims of George Bush’s policies, should give pause to its critics, especially the nervous liberals rushing to disassociate themselves from Michael Moore.
    There has been much tut-tutting by pundits who complain that the movie, though it has yet to be caught in any major factual errors, uses association and innuendo to create false impressions. Many of these same pundits consider it bad form to make a big fuss about the Bush administration’s use of association and innuendo to link the Iraq war to 9/11. Why hold a self-proclaimed polemicist to a higher standard than you hold the president of the United States?
    And for all its flaws, “Fahrenheit 9/11” performs an essential service. It would be a better movie if it didn’t promote a few unproven conspiracy theories, but those theories aren’t the reason why millions of people who aren’t die-hard Bush-haters are flocking to see it. These people see the film to learn true stories they should have heard elsewhere, but didn’t. Mr. Moore may not be considered respectable, but his film is a hit because the respectable media haven’t been doing their job.
    For example, audiences are shocked by the now-famous seven minutes, when George Bush knew the nation was under attack but continued reading “My Pet Goat” with a group of children. Nobody had told them that the tales of Mr. Bush’s decisiveness and bravery on that day were pure fiction.
    Or consider the Bush family’s ties to the Saudis. The film suggests that Mr. Bush and his good friend Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the ambassador known to the family as Bandar Bush, have tried to cover up the extent of Saudi involvement in terrorism. This may or may not be true. But what shocks people, I think, is the fact that nobody told them about this side of Mr. Bush’s life.
    Mr. Bush’s carefully constructed persona is that of an all-American regular guy