Khomeini’s grandson pushes for a revolution’s revolution

Khomeini’s grandson pushes for a revolution’s revolution
: The grandson of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, an Iranian reformist, goes to Iraq and says some surprising things about the state of Iran, the Star-Ledger reports:

grandson of the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the fiery cleric who launched an anti-American Islamic revolution in Iran that sparked 25 years of unrest in the Gulf region, yesterday condemned Iran’s clerical regime and suggested United States military intervention in Iran as a possible path to liberation for his country.

“In Iran, the people really need freedom and freedom must come about. Freedom is more important than bread,” said Hussein Khomeini.

The 45-year-old cleric said that “if there’s no way for freedom in Iran other than American intervention, I think the people would accept that. I would accept it, too, because it’s in accord with my faith.”

The young Khomeini — here ostensibly on a religious pilgrimage to Shi’a holy sites in Najaf, Karbala and Baghdad — praised the U.S. takeover of Iraq.

“I see day-by-day that (Iraq) is on the path to improvement,” he said. “I see that there’s security, that the people are happy, that they’ve been released from suffering.” …

The young Khomeini argues for the separation of religion and state…

He condemned Saddam Hussein’s regime and criticized those countries opposed to the war against Iraq’s Ba’athist government as ignorant of the conditions under which Iraqis were suffering.

“The people here were subject to crimes unprecedented in world history,” he said.

He said nationalism has no basis in religious doctrine, and freedom was more important than independence from foreign rule. “Freedom is a basic right. It supersedes all,” he said.

Iranian blogger Kaveh is amazed that some of this was even published in Iran.

4 responses to “Khomeini’s grandson pushes for a revolution’s revolution”

  1. Lola Avatar

    He actually said all this???

  2. Lola Avatar

    And won’t he get in trouble if he goes back to Iran? Some people just may try to “disappear” him but it’s gonna be hard explaining why a Khomeini is missing.

  3. Stephen Avatar

    Yeah, listen to him. Comes the revolution, the radical torturors will be out and moderate, more secular government (hopefully) will be ushered in. But will the religious component of Iranian life evaporate completely? I think not. Why should it? But it will be hard to find a leading cleric untainted by present circumstances. What better place for a moderate, modern cleric who has “been away” and not directly connected–nonetheless complete with with name recognition.
    I’m probably wrong, but this has the odor of long term postioning. I hope he believes what he’s saying.

  4. Mac Avatar

    Apparrently he’s been saying it for awhile, and his position isn’t just a “theocracy is bad for the people” argument—he’s got some serious theological/doctrinal gripes with the entire concept of a cleric-run government, as noted at my site (here then here) and explained further by Pejman.
    As for the questions, “…will the religious component of Iranian life evaporate completely? I think not. Why should it?”
    It won’t “completely” evaporate, but at the same time it largely already has. The majority of the population there is under 35 and not too pumped up one way or another about their parents religion or their revolution. I’ve even heard quite a few refer to Islam as “an Arab thing” forced on them from the outside. Granted, that happened a very long time ago, but to hear them talk, it’s like yesterday.
    In the countryside things are a bit more different, of course, but the fate of Iran for now is more likely to be in the hands of the urbanites and the students.