Aw shucks

Aw shucks

: I started reading Fimoculous’ year-end State of the Blogs address nodding my head in agreement:

Before anyone tries to talk you into uttering senseless historical inanities, let’s just clear this up: 2004 was not “The Year of the Blog.” This was not the year of Howard Dean’s bold online campaign, nor was it the year of dismantling Trent Lott. It wasn’t even the year of the Paris Hilton tape. That was all last year, and while we have plenty to celebrate about ’04, it’s best to approach the past 365 days wearing a new look: maturity. In other words, this was the year blogs grew up.

Don’t mistake that assessment as a suggestion that blogs are slipping into a rheumatic slumber. To be sure, it was a good year, one in which we (may I use the royal first person?) booted a tiresome TV anchor, sparred with the FCC, pre-reported Ken Jennings’ demise, and discovered an entire radical music movement. Excellent work, and that’s not even counting the intrepid analysis of Tara Reid’s nipple.

But this was a landmark year for independent publishers not so much because of Lewinsky-size scoops, but because the internet came into its own as a medium for experiencing news events. Think about it — look how many events didn’t necessarily happen first online, but seemed to exist because of the blogosphere. The moments that best defined culture in ’04 — the best political debate (Jon Stewart pouncing on Crossfire), the best sex media scandal (Bill O’Reilly raping a falafel), the best TV moment (Janet exposing a Super Bowl nipple), and the best music video (Ashlee Simpson lip synching on SNL) — were all probably delivered to you via blogger keystrokes. These media events all somehow felt, if you will, “internety” — somewhat like how Jon Stewart’s Daily Show has that intangible quality that makes it feel like television’s version of a blog.

In other words, 2004 was the year we became the medium that mattered….

And then I scrolled down to find something I didn’t agree with, but it’s damned nice of him anyway. You’ll see….

: MORE: Uh-oh, there are more year-end wrap coming. I hate year-end wrap, except that they make the last week of the year easy for reporters and editors. That is why they exist.

: MORE: Lileks does his year-end wrap (no mayo) on blogs:

Full disclosure: This writer knows the Power Line guys, and has a Web site of his own. Good thing, too; the Internet is going to make gigs like this obsolete, once enough people realize that some guy in his basement is capable of turning out commentary as insightful as a tenured eminence who was handed a column 30 years ago and has spent the last 10 coasting on a scoop from the Reagan years. It takes dynamite to get some writers out of the paper.

In the new media, however, a clever blog can spring up overnight and get 100,000 readers in a day. That number can quickly fall to zero if the blogger gets a terminal case of the stupids….

In a sense, blogging is so 2004. The next big thing will be videoblogs. You can fit a rudimentary TV studio in a suitcase — a laptop, a camcorder, a few cables, and a nearby Starbucks with Wi-Fi you can leech onto to upload your reports. This too will be good. One hundred thousand pairs of eyes looking high and low, versus CBS’ staring monocular orb. We’ll all turn to the nets to see what they think we should think. And then we’ll hit the blogs for the rest of the story.

I second that motion.

6 responses to “Aw shucks”

  1. josh g Avatar

    Maybe I’m in the minority here…but I can’t imagine ever wanting to watch a videoblog. What’s the point? Unless it is meant to document events or artistic media, I wouldn’t waste my time downloading/streaming video when I could read it, skim it, skip it, highlight it, cut & paste it.
    Internet video, to me, is all hype. It has its place (i.e. news event, movie trailers, etc.) and that place, in my humble and quite often wrong opinion, is not in a commentary blog.

  2. Tom Avatar

    Good idea, possibly great idea. However, text is a big thing and probably always will be.
    Videoblogs, while fascinating, have one problem right now – bandwidth. We’re still in a time where the average blogger would probably not be able to offer all of his/her readers a five-minute podcast every day without coming up with a big bill at month’s end. Video won’t help this one bit. Sure, IP is cheap, but that doesn’t mean your hosting plan is – someone’s making money in there somewhere.
    As for josh g’s comments above, I agree. The thing that’s nice about the wealth of blogs around is that I can skim when I want, read details when I want, and so on. Video is nice, but it’s complementary at the moment, frankly. I think I would gladly put up a video “show” once a week or something if the server could handle it – but until that point, it’s still not the primary focus.

  3. Little John Avatar
    Little John

    Bah. What’s not to agree with? You’ve done a yeoman’s job on getting truth out where more people can see it, and accelerated a chain of events that should deeply damage the cause of censorship. You have my thanks for that alone.
    Incidentally, I agree with the previous comments: I’ve little use for videoblogs unless it’s actual news I’m watching. Reading is so much faster than listening, and much easier to go back a paragraph to reread something.

  4. Marjo R. Moore Avatar

    You forgot Ginny Schrader’s blog-fundraising success in southeastern Pennsylvania…LOL It might’ve made a better story if she’d actually won Greenwood’s seat.
    What a thought provoking read, your site. I’m going to link to it, regardless of if you ever look at mine.
    I’m a freelance writer- do you think blogs are displacing conventional journalism to a dangerous extent? My blog posts are far and away biased, and most of my posts stem from stories I’ve written. -I remember my first editor accompanying me to town meetings, where I was to take over reporting for him. On his last night, he got up to address the meeting and basically told them all off. He came back, sat down, and whispered to me-“of course, you can NEVER do that, as long as you want to be employed.”
    Yet, look at Bill Moyers, another legend. He addressed the SPJ convention in September and told them he thought Bush was a terrible president, a man who’d done a great many disservices to this country during his tenure. Is that objectivity? Is that right? Isn’t it all our opinion anyway?
    I like your post- blogging as a new medium, a new addition to journalism, good or bad.

  5. Brian H Avatar

    Video blogs would need last-mile gigabit pipes or SLT, and synched Closed Captioning so I could speed-watch them and slow down for the good bits. Usually narrowband good, broadband bad, unless you’re a special effects lover.

  6. Chuck Olsen Avatar

    I’m happy to say you videoblog naysayers are wrong. Archive.org hosts original video content for free, taking care of the hosting issue. 5 minute vlogcasts aren’t a big download if compressed properly, but would you believe people are distributing broadcast quality programming using bittorrent? It’s true! Videoblogs are going to revolutionize television the way blogs have revolutionized journalism — just watch.
    Check out Rocketboom: http://rocketboom.com
    And my own forthcoming blog show, “Blog Soup.” :-)