Lies and the lying liars who get book contracts

Lies and the lying liars who get book contracts

: Robert Rivard, editor of the San Antonio Express-News, writes that scandals in journalism — in the age of Jayson Blair, Jack Kelly, Stephen Glass, Andrew Gilligan — aren’t getting the coverage they deserve:

There is another scandal-ridden industry these days, come to think of it, but you read far less about it. High-profile cases are covered, but the larger problem is not considered particularly newsworthy.

That industry is our own, the press.

I hate to think how big that “larger problem” could be. But here’s an editor saying it’s there.

When I was a reporter, I was obsessive about reporting facts accurately. I’d stare at my reporters’ notebook trying to decipher my own bad brand of shorthand to sweat out whether the quote said “which” or “that” and if I wasn’t sure, I’d throw out the quote marks. Of course, that was obsession to a fault. I want to shake up the younger me and shout, “Forest! Trees!” But getting facts and quotes right was a canon of the craft and getting something wrong was a harikari moment. The reporters I knew were all like that. So maybe I was naive then and didn’t see the bigger scandal brewing. Or maybe times have changed. Or maybe it’s always true that every barrel has bad apples. Rivard says:

This wave of dishonesty has surfaced in newsrooms across the country, including some of the most prestigious ones. Most editors I have asked believe there are undiscovered cheaters still at work.

Every newspaper industry publication and Web site chronicles one disclosure after another: a food writer in Hartford, a community reporter in Macon

10 responses to “Lies and the lying liars who get book contracts”

  1. MattS Avatar

    I’ve thought about this. It’s not an easy problem to solve. I would like the cable circuit to not promote these books.

  2. mary hodder Avatar

    After the Jason Blair thing broke, people covered in his stories were interviewed about why they didn’t tell the NYT that the info was totally wrong or made up. They said they thought this happened all the time and there was no point. Discouraging.
    I have to say I’m cynical about some reporting myself, at least about the topics I know a lot about, because that reporting is often wrong, though mistaken I think because they are rushing. I blog the mistakes, which may be a way of telling the reporter/paper. But reporters I know (LATimes, NYT, SFGate — all but one say this) tell me they don’t have time to read blogs and think they are all cranks and crazies (me excepted, as I’m their friend).
    The bottom line for me is that people are cynical for one personal reason or another about big media, and they see big media as out of sync, and unreachable, so when either Jayson Blair or the food writer in Hartford show up in the news, it just confirms what they think. I know most reporters work really hard to be as accurate as they can, to get things right. But even they are biased and have their problems. If they talked about it in human terms with their readers, the public would trust them a lot more. But given the lack of dialog and perspective, the public blows off these scandals as run of the mill. No interest.
    In addition, there are reporters who do the “martyr – superior” thing. One of these people I know at one of those pubs above actually said this two weeks ago, in reference to when he will allow a source to go anon: “we have to be in the business of screwing over the powerful and wrongheaded, not in screwing a working person…” so he allows anon quotes or info from the latter, but not the former if they ask. I have to say, I find that a little scary. Because he’s a major guy at a top three paper.
    I think the public picks up on this energy in the press’ words, even if they don’t know these reporters personally to talk about it, and they don’t like it. It’s not what the press is there for and so they blow off the screw ups because they are already blowing off the reporting somewhat anyway.

  3. Ebb Tide Avatar
    Ebb Tide

    People in journalism today (broad brush, sorry) want instant glamour, instant “Woodword and Berstein-ness accolades” … nevermind the hard work: boring research, leg work, assiduous attention to detail; give them INSTANT PULITZER PRIZES.
    Howie Kurtz has been writing about how come no one is giving the USA Today writer the media attention that Blair got? The USA Today writer was white, was at the helm of his deception for far longer than Blair, can not claim it was the dugs, mental illness that caused him to make his stories up ……. yet it is not creating a media roar, like the Blair story got.

  4. Robert McClelland Avatar

    >When I was a reporter, I was obsessive about reporting facts accurately.
    That is rampant BS considering your dishonesty of including Gilligan in with the first two on your list. After all, it’s not like he intentionally set out to mislead the public and his only faux pas was to make an off the cuff flip remark on a BBC program that hardly anyone watched.
    But hey, if that is what you reporter types consider obsessing over the facts it’s no wonder so many reporters are getting caught making stuff up these days.

  5. Temple A. Stark Avatar

    >>If they talked about it in human terms with their readers, the public would trust them a lot more.
    I’m not completely sure this is true. I think there would be a lot of “see I told you so” as you indicated earlier.
    I would like a broader discussion on the matter, however. I always will involve myself in subjects surrounding journalism because that’s how I make a living and I care about it very much.
    The reasons why and how media exist are a kaleidoscope. A very complex situation. But, the goal should always be the same – accuracy.
    I agree with the sentiment about booting known plagarists out of the industry. But you use the phrase “publishing industry” instead of media industry. A distinction that’s worth making. Books – even bios – are full of lies and half-truths, by omission if nothing else. They are different animals.
    Let the market decide on the books. The market should not decide decisions of journalism. readers should be our guide – and each newspaper should have a review process or editorial meeting that includes a member of the public

  6. Howard Avatar

    Ethics in the legal field are like the ethics in the field of news reporting. They are non-existent. The subject receives no more than lip service at most universities today. Ergo, newspeople graduate with the thought that in order to compete for the most titalating news clips, it is okay for facts to become the first casuality.
    I don’t read the paper anymore, except for Dilbert. Every article in the papers these days are slanted “editorials”. I agree, I think that the whole field of journalism is suspect, and it will continue to degrade because nothing will be done to correct the problem.
    And we haven’t even begun to talk about the slanted (bent) “news SHOWS” produced by Television.

  7. Julie Cleeveley Avatar
    Julie Cleeveley

    Gilligan is now writing for the Standard in London. This is the only evening paper in town and it has, in recent years become unreadable. Drowning in anti-American, anti- Israeli vitriol.Yet another paper I buy out of habit, and then throw away in disgust five minutes later.

  8. Easycure Avatar

    Bad doctors and nurses are routinely hired and fired, moving from one hospital to the next.
    The reason their files are not disclosed from one employer to the next is probably similar to why a suspect reporter’s file may not be disclosed from one employer to the next:
    Disclosure laws and the lawsuits waged by these idiots who sue former employers for giving them a “bad rap” when they most often have deserved it.

  9. hugh macleod Avatar

    Well, the journos can’t stop the blog phenomenon, any more than they could stop the invasion of France in 1940.
    I don’t know what Jeff thinks (I haven’t asked, to be honest), but I don’t think they can even delay them anymore, either.
    So somebody writes a “Blogs Are Overrated” article for Forbes. Who cares?
    The train has already left the station.

  10. Billy Beck Avatar

    Here’s something I wonder:
    Every time the word “accuracy” appears in this context, I wonder if the speaker’s tongue would shrivel up or the writer’s hand would fall off if they tried to use the word “truth”, instead.
    It’s been said that Pragmatism is the only original American contribution to philosophy. It’s a cryin’ shame: I think that’s the damned truth.