Deconstructed

Deconstructed
: At a Newspaper Association online meeting last week, participants were invited, to considerable fanfare, to contribute to a group blog. Well, nobody did. It flopped like a dead fish on faded fishwrap. At the Poynter blog, Katja Riefler wonders why. I’ll tell you: A blog is a personal thing (even for a group). We contribute to our blogs because they are ours.

Creating a group blog for the meeting is old-media think; it’s going by the old assumption that everything needs to be centralized; it imagines that you are still the marketplace. If you wanted the conference blogged, it’s really quite simple:

Invite bloggers. And they will blog.

In this distributed, decentralized, deconstructed media world, you have to think differently (especially if you’re in the media): There is no more special privilege or power given to the guy with the conch because now everybody has a conch. Imagine a media world in which everybody is a reporter and photographer (and columnist); everybody owns a press and a broadcast tower. And then ask how the media landscape should be constructed. Now, instead of making everyone come to one place for one source of news, news is everywhere; there’s more news than ever; it’s just a matter of finding it (and finding the right news). It’s also a matter of enabling these many, diverse, and decentralized sources of news — these citizens — to work.

Invite citizens.

: At RSS Winterfest yesterday, I got excited talking about how I’m coming to think of the essential architecture of my day-job content as feeds (RSS, or equivalent). So for a given town, I will have feeds of the information from inside the organization: newspaper headlines, blog headlines, forum threads, classified listings, weather, sports scores… It’s all feeds. And as soon as you think about it that way, it’s no big to add feeds from outside the organization: bloggers’ headline feeds, feeds of related headlines from other news sources, feeds of listings from other sources, feeds of photos and audio and video.

And it gets really exciting when the feeds start reacting to each other (via Technorati links or Movable Type trackbacks or something new coming down the pike). The feeds start conversations. You find out what people really care about. And all this also creates an asset that can be saved and searched and used.

There is still a big role for a guy at the center to enable those conversations and a marketplace.

But you have to think in new ways. It’s no long about the one guy with the press or the conch or the blog. It’s about everybody.

Enable the citizens.

7 responses to “Deconstructed”

  1. Mike G Avatar

    A blog managed by your boss and owned by your big corporate parent! Who wouldn’t want to pour his heart and soul into such a thing!
    It’s sort of like taking a vacation at your boss’s house.

  2. henrycopeland Avatar

    I’ve done a lot of puzzling about what makes blogs BUZZ while newspapers just gargle.
    Voice? Blogrolling? Simplicity? Authenticity? Speed of delivery? Brainstorming? All of these help.
    But can they full explain why a blog post by Josh Marshall or Atrios or Glenn Reynolds gets 100 times more readers than an article written by an individual employed by NYTimes.com?
    Then, commmenting last week on Welch’s blog, it hit me. Enemies.
    Newspapers neutered themselves when they sought to economize by becoming impartial so they could share copy via the Associated Press. (Remember how partisan AND popular newspapers were 100 years ago? It’s been downhill ever since.)
    Most communities are forged as much by antagonism to others as by fraternity with peers. To create and sustain themselves, NY needs NJ, the Red Sox need the Yankees, Yale needs Harvard, North needs South, Democrats need Republicans… ad infinitum.
    Blogs, which are blatantly and joyously partisan, can actually get into dialogs and debate. And it is partisan debate that drives traffic and passion and community… the wonders of blogging.
    And I don’t think any newspaper or, frankly, any top-down VC-funded friendship-linkster tinkertoy is going to match the blogging’s magical partisanship either.

  3. Richard Meixner Avatar
    Richard Meixner

    “And it gets really exciting when the feeds start reacting to each other”
    Yes! When/where can I get my hands on software like the stuff that Amazon uses to track choices and then make directed suggestions? Would I have to set the search-n-scan routines? I’d like to try something like this.

  4. Sissy Willis Avatar

    Respect amongst one’s peers comes through acceptable displays, of which the blog is the best ever was: http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/2004/01/jeff_jarvis_has.html

  5. Homer Robinson Avatar
    Homer Robinson

    What I don’t get is why newspapers don’t put their op-ed sections on blogs. With comments enabled, they would get the best of both worlds. Yes, I know, it would require thinking out of the box. But with numbers dropping like stones it couldn’t hurt. What they scared of, loss of control. It’s a litle too late for that.

  6. Daniel Avatar

    Invite bloggers. And they will blog.

    Hehe. Is this the new version of:
    Build it, and they will come.

  7. John Anderson Avatar
    John Anderson

    Dissent.
    Well, not really, I agree with almost all of your points. But the one on which I disagree is a big one.
    Very few bloggers initiate news or go out to get a story. Most find news in “big media” and report on that, discuss it, find more news which contradicts or supports, etc. This is a very valuable thing, allowing people like myself to evaluate the evaluations and learn things my local “big media” would never mention but other outlets do. In this sense, I suppose blogs may be called investigative reporting and I laud them for it.
    But tearing apart ABC news (either American or Australian) is not the same as being ABC news or filling its function. Refuting a NYTimes article by pointing to Japan Daily is useful, and doing it by pointing to verifiable sources like an original IPCC report (and its differences from the “politician’s summary” thereof/therin) is even better. It is why I read blogs ( over 400 and counting…) – to learn more about things in the news. And of course, in a more entertaining, thorough, yet concentrated, way than the local paper (don’t get me going about local TV news, it may be news but seldom if ever informative).
    So I consider blogs to be symbiotes (some parasites, but that’s a different matter) with big media, not replacement.