The real story

The real story
: There’s something wrong with this picture…

Today, USA Today reports that ABC News and Time are joining to create “a series of in-depth reports in November on how the war in Iraq is affecting ordinary Iraqis.” Says ABC News President David Westin:

”I’ve been troubled for some time about the reporting of all news organizations on the situation in Iraq,” he wrote. ”We often seem to be captive to the individual dramatic incident — and those of us in television subject to one that comes with great video.

”ABC News is now going to address this conspicuous lacking in the reporting to date,” Westin wrote. ”Our goal is essentially to conduct an audit across several parts of Iraq, gauging the quality of life for the average citizen.”

Now on the one hand, you might want to clap Westin on the back and say, good for you, sir, finally getting deeper into the story.

But here’s what’s wrong with this:

They shouldn’t have to launch a damned task force to do this reporting.

They should be doing this reporting every day of the week.

What life is like in Iraq is a good and essential story and most organizations haven’t been reporting it. They are, instead, as Westin says, reporting the “dramatic incident” — the bombings, the deaths — and, of course, they should be reporting that. But they should be doing more.

They should have their reporters who are there out wandering the streets, meeting the people, finding the stories from all perspectives of life in a new Iraq.

You don’t need a damned “audit” to figure out why that isn’t being done and to fix it.

The stories aren’t being done for one of two simple reasons: The reporters aren’t reporting it or the producers/editors aren’t letting them through.

And everybody’s sticking with the pack: The pack of reporters reporting the same stories, the pack of networks and news organizations running the same stories.

You fix that by having assigning editors tell reporters to get out and get stories about what it’s like on the ground there; bring the sense of the place home; give me many interviews, many perspectives, many stories.

This big “in-depth report” strategy is really just a PR move to get ABC off the hook for not doing this.

And it will skew the story. It presumes that one series of reports will tell the real story and then we can forget it and go back to business as usual. Wrong.

You get the real story by reporting the real story every damned day of the week.

: UPDATE: Here’s a Gallup poll of people in Iraq.

The Gallup poll found that 71 percent of the capital city’s residents felt U.S. troops should not leave in the next few months. Just 26 percent felt the troops should leave that soon.

4 responses to “The real story”

  1. ....a moment with Easycure Avatar
    ….a moment with Easycure

    Exactly.
    And that’s why informed people don’t go to Time or ABC News for the news. That would be a huge waste of time.

  2. Julie Avatar

    I can’t help but be skeptical. Will these journalists finally leave their colleagues in their hotel to run around trying to find the 29% who don’t want the US there? Or will they do in-depth coverage of the huge mass graves, the ammo dumps larger than Manhattan, the industrial shredder that Iraqi’s were fed into, the school girls paraded in front of Uday for his pleasure? I guess we’ll see. But SOMEONE should do a primetime documentary on all of the above.

  3. John Anderson Avatar
    John Anderson

    I, too, am skeptical. Old saying – “It’s the squeaky wheel that gets the grease.” If the usual media were doing its job just in Baghdad, they would already have been reporting that despite continued incidents most people know there is not yet a government in place they can actually trust (not many like Chalabi, for instance) and want the coalition to stick around long enough to train police and armed forces. But all we hear are the gunfights and explosions, and of course the mass Friday crowds leaving Mosque services calling for immediate change.
    Sending reporter to other places will probably result in the same stuff, not time spent in back-road cafes talking to regular people but only in arranged meetings with those who approach the reporters with sad – even horrific – stories and anger about post-Saddam events.
    Not that I don’t get upset at things. Remember the good news about water being restored to the Marsh Arabs? I have heard (not verified) that money to keep the water flowing has already been cut from the aid package by our congresscritters.

  4. button Avatar

    They’re at a distinct disadvantage in competing with the BBC. This is a large part of the reason for why the BBC is furnished to us domestically at all. (It’s often found here on some branch of NPR.)
    For financial reasons (they said), they cut back on foreign coverage, news bureaus abroad, etc. They handed that job over, by default, to the wire services and– tah taah– the BBC.
    Now they want to change that? And where’s the financing for it going to come from?