Less is more … short is smart … brief is beautiful

Less is more … short is smart … brief is beautiful
: David Shaw laments the shortening of stories in American journalism. Of course, he does. He writes (too) long. (Oddly, this is the shortest story I’ve read from Shaw; guess he doesn’t have a lot to say about saying a lot.)

I will defend short. I had to defend short when I started Entertainment Weekly. I still defend it on the web. Long does not mean smart. Long usually means under-edited. It is a rare long magazine or newspaper opus — or NPR odyssey — that keeps my interest until the end and that’s not because of nascent ADD; it’s because the writer or editor had too little judgment or too much ego to cut out the unnecessary stuff. That is their job; that is the key service they provide. If I want to read, listen to, or watch too much I can now that the Internet gives me plenty of source documents. What I pay for from professional media is good editing.

4 responses to “Less is more … short is smart … brief is beautiful”

  1. nogoatee Avatar
    nogoatee

    It’s really true– except I actually miss the long New Yorker pieces where I learned things on every page. Their value-add was in publishing exactly what they deemed important, on TOP of professional line edits.
    It didn’t make for a sexy product, though, and in increasingly time-pressured households (2-income ones especially) they rendered themselves irrelevant, as fewer and fewer people read them.

  2. Steve Avatar

    I couldn’t agree with your comments more – although I have a difficult time following such guidelines myself. Long writing should be left for research and real scoop reporting. What is now deemed as research or scoop reporting usually amounts to opinionated drivel with a few quotes thrown in for good looks…

  3. matt pfeffer Avatar

    “Good editing,” however, shouldn’t just mean culling. It should also mean demanding some decent proportion of the relevant aspects of a story be filled in.
    That’s not a function of length — Shaw’s off-target, there — but it’s all too true that most news stories leave their readers woefully uninformed about basic background elements necessary for a genuine understanding of the issues.

  4. Sweet Lou Avatar
    Sweet Lou

    Mr. Jarvis,
    Thank you. You have done me a great service with this post. I would appreciate more on this subject.