Ad Age column: The open ad marketplace

Power couple: How bloggers and advertisers can finally hook up
To truly explode, blogosphere needs improved ad-placement system, more detailed metrics

By Jeff Jarvis

Advertising Age
Published: May 08, 2006

It is just too difficult today for advertisers to join in the exploding world of blogs, podcasts, citizens’ media and the mass of niches. It’s hard for them to find the best and most relevant blogs, to measure and verify their audiences and to assure that they’re trusted. It’s harder still to reach the authors and negotiate rates. Though some blogs are in ad networks, they may not be the ones the marketers want most-and those networks may place ads the bloggers don’t want. Finally, serving the ads is a technical headache for both advertiser and blogger.

Yet I hear advertisers dying to reach customers via influential blogs, and I hear bloggers dying to get their money. This infant medium is growing fast. Media research firm PQMedia’s just-released study of blogs, podcasts and RSS pegged 2005 ad spending at $20.4 million and forecast a 145% rise this year, to $49.8 million, with growth of ads on user-generated content expected to continue at an annual rate of 106% through 2010.

Imagine if it were actually easy to buy ads there; citizens’ media would explode.

So how do we accomplish that? I propose an open ad marketplace that would allow advertisers to find the best blogs and bloggers to find the best ad deals. Here’s what I think is needed:

First, of course, advertisers crave metrics. We need an open-source standard for measurement that tallies not just audience and views but other key values of citizens’ media. Technorati.com counts links to blogs as a measure of authority. We also can track which blogs start conversations. And advertisers can buy sites based not just on the audiences’ demographics but also on the authors’. (Want to launch a new teen idol? Buy ads on blogs by teens.) Ad agencies should be able to search site descriptions and verified traffic data to aggregate the perfect ad hoc groupings of blogs for their campaigns from among the 34 million sites out there.

Second, we need an open-source code for placing ads from any advertiser or network on any participating site. Blogging software should make it easy to include these ad calls, at a blogger’s option. Podcasts and videos, too, need a way to serve and track ads.

building trust

Third, we need systems of trust. At the lowest level, advertisers need assurance that a person, not a spamming robot, created each blog. At a higher level, blog networks, ad agencies or media companies will seek out high-quality blogs and vet them to create valued networks they can tailor and sell to marketers. Some direct-response advertisers may be fine with their ads appearing most anywhere, if they get the clicks. But brand advertisers must protect their reputations and will want someone to know and trust the authors.

Eventually, we also need an auction system to automate negotiation of rates. I’ve used systems where I set the rates and others where advertisers set prices, but I believe we need the means to negotiate from both sides to establish true market value. Even before that exists, though, if advertisers can manually find, measure and vet blogs and place ads on them, I am confident their dollars will flow to this new world.

Rishad Tobaccowala, CEO of Denuo, Publicis Groupe’s think tank, agrees about the potential of advertising on citizens’ media. “Brands are trustmarks, and to earn and retain this trust they must remain relevant by marketing in environments which resonate with both brand and consumer values,” he says. “Today, increasingly, various forms of citizen media such as blogs are becoming such environments, but clients need not only a way to filter the appropriate places but also cost-effective and measurable ways to do so.”

By creating this infrastructure, we take the friction out of the ad marketplace: Every blog is an atom and every ad campaign is a molecule that attracts the best. Thus advertisers and media each gain control and increase their effectiveness and their value. In this post-scarcity world of the Internet, freed of the limitations of the page and the clock, you could argue that as no end of ad inventory becomes available, rates will only drop. But I also believe that advertisers will pay higher rates for the right sites that perform efficiently for them. Thus, high-quality sites will earn more and advertisers will waste less. That is the value of openness.

Openness has another key virtue: It is the best response to a monopoly. And if media big and small do not challenge Google’s growing hegemony over advertising-not just online but next in print and broadcast-then we will have only ourselves to blame.

There is still a great deal to be tried and learned about effective advertising in a customer-controlled world. I’ve experimented with many ad networks on my blog and it’s clear to me that advertising in the mass of niches must be highly targeted from the advertiser’s perspective and highly relevant from the customer’s. But there is already money to be made. I’ve made a few thousand dollars from my blog and have even fielded advertisers’ RFPs (though even as a media guy, I had trouble figuring them out; we do need to translate adspeak to civilian blogspeak). My teenage son and Webmaster earns more from ads on his blog (JakeJarvis.com) than from his allowance. The vlog (video blog) Rocketboom.com just auctioned its first week of advertising on eBay for $40,000. I know bloggers and podcasters who are earning a living in our new media. So the greatest benefit of the open ad marketplace I propose is that it will support an even greater explosion of citizens’ media and choice for advertisers.

So what’s next? Jarvis Coffin, president-CEO of BURST! Media, and I are beginning to organize a trade group for citizens’ media, which could begin to set measurement standards and perform research on the medium. An open-source ad call could be established by a meeting of interested parties. Agencies, media companies and analytics companies can then use these tools to find, vet and aggregate high-quality collections of citizens’ media. And some smart entrepreneur-or perhaps eBay-could run an auction marketplace. There’s a brand new medium out here owned by all our customers that’s just waiting for us to act.

Jeff Jarvis is new-media columnist for The Guardian and head of the interactive journalism program at CUNY’s new Graduate School of Journalism. He blogs at Buzzmachine.com.

0 responses to “Ad Age column: The open ad marketplace”

  1. […] (In case you have problems with the site’s on-and-off registration, another version is here.) […]

  2. […] Jeff Jarvis proposes the open ad marketplace, “that would allow advertisers to find the best blogs and bloggers to find the best ad deals.” […]

  3. […] Jeff Jarvis also has ideas about changes to the way advertisers hook up with publishers. In The open ad marketplace, he details a system that makes it easier for advertisers and bloggers to get together. Jeff’s proposal has room for current players (ad agencies and the like) but also for new ideas and players. […]

  4. […] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. […]

  5. […] 2. Money and syndication. * If anyone wants syndication to get ad support so it will (a) be free and (b) get tons of content, then we’ll have to figure out how to collect metrics: views, users, usage, and such via cookies and reporting. * Is advertising working on feeds? (To my surprise, my Feedburner ads are yielding about $200 a month.) * Can we put wrappers on feeds and P2P — as Warner Brothers put a wrapper onto Bittorrent — to enable measurement, tracking, and ad serving? Should we? * What about paid-subscription feeds? Is this the new newsletter, the new magazine, the new cable channel? Good idea or bad? * I’ll plug my notion of an open-source ad marketplace. * Insert discussion of digital rights management here. […]

  6. […] Poynter  article by Amy Gahran which gives a good angle on the recently proposed model by Jeff Jarvis for making ads work on blogs. (Full detail here on Jeff's own site.) Amy points out that current (and maybe we should add established and trusted) media owners also stand in a strong position to benefit from the explosion of independent blogs. They can bypass the Systems of Trust stage of Jeff's model and instead themselves leverage directly the "best" blogs. It will be interesting to see how the two alternative outlooks develop… […]

  7. […] Jarvis also reiterated an opinion he’d made in AdAge recently, that there needed to be an open ad marketplace so advertisers who want to spend money on blogs could give it to blogs who really would like to have that money. […]

  8. […] I think the real winners in the future will be the ones who craft strategies that find advantage in giving up control. You won’t win by technology (and, yes, infrastructure alone) because there can always be better technology. You can’t win forever by trying to own a closed structure because you’re then always vulnerable to open competitors (enabled by new, open standards). You need to figure out how to win by enabling control at the edge, not in your center. […]

  9. […] Or maybe not. The smart network response to all this is to liquify. You let your stuff be found anywhere, in any medium and any network. You let your public distribute for you (see Jon Stewart’s Crossfire rant). Most important — and this is where Umair said ABC should have been going next — you should recommend good stuff to people and it shouldn’t be just your stuff; you use your relationship, trust, and resources to aggregate stuff and audience across the world of possibilities. (This is essentially what I’m also suggesting to the BBC in my Guardian column this week, coming soon.) In the old static-network world, it made no sense to send people to other networks; in the new, fluid world, they’re going to go there anyway, and so the best thing to do is to help them find the best stuff, redefining the value of a network. And from a business perspective, I argue, you’re wise to grow audience and ad inventory across open networks of the stuff you recommend. Umair says that ABC took a good move in unbundling content from distribution but what it should really be doing is rebundling content with audiences: Rebundling is where value capture will happen – at communities, reconstructors, markets, networks – that direct people’s attention to individualized ‘casts. This is where branding will be reborn – and where advertising is already being disrupted, ripped apart, and reborn (viz, Google, PPC, pay per call, etc) […]

  10. […] BuzzMachine » Ad Age column: The open ad marketplace (tags: blogs media advertising) […]

  11. […] I think he’s quite right. And I think the answer to that is relationships and trust. Google runs on sheer tonnage. Brand advertising is about trusted environments. If we in blogs get our acts together — see my Ad Age column suggesting how — then we can form quality networks of trusted and targeted sites for the right advertisers and gain value way ahead of what Google pays us for the coincidence of words on our pages. Which leads to his second point in an earlier post: What if the Google proletariat were to suddenly rise up en masse and throw off the yoke of AdSense? […]

  12. […] Advertising is the next big industry to suffer huge upheaval thanks to the internet. They may think they’re already there, but they’re not, not by a long shot. In fact, it is the ad industry that is holding up the progress of other industries — newspapers, TV, radio, cable — that are already getting tromped on by that elephant. Advertisers can get away with moving slowly — for now — because they are the ones with the money. Funny how that works. But this won’t last for long, as one client and then one agency discovers that the lazy, traditional, one-stop-shopping of TV upfront and the big-media lunch circuit is inefficient, wasteful, untargeted, irrelevant, and ultimately damned irritating to your customers. Once that tipping point comes, dollars will start flowing to the upstarts online — not as many dollars concentrated in a few places as before, but spread out far and wide. As Bob Garfield pointed out in Ad Age and on On the Media, the upstarts aren’t quite ready for it, but once they see money sitting on the table, they’ll get ready fast (see my Ad Age piece on an open-source ad infrastructure for the distributed world). The day of reckoning nears. […]

  13. […] And I’ll say that this is one more reason why we need to get our act together in the networked/distributed/citizens media world and create higher value ad networks built on trust. See my Ad Age call for an open-source ad network here. […]

  14. […] Or maybe not. The smart network response to all this is to liquify. You let your stuff be found anywhere, in any medium and any network. You let your public distribute for you (see Jon Stewart’s Crossfire rant). Most important — and this is where Umair said ABC should have been going next — you should recommend good stuff to people and it shouldn’t be just your stuff; you use your relationship, trust, and resources to aggregate stuff and audience across the world of possibilities. (This is essentially what I’m also suggesting to the BBC in my Guardian column this week, coming soon.) In the old static-network world, it made no sense to send people to other networks; in the new, fluid world, they’re going to go there anyway, and so the best thing to do is to help them find the best stuff, redefining the value of a network. And from a business perspective, I argue, you’re wise to grow audience and ad inventory across open networks of the stuff you recommend. Umair says that ABC took a good move in unbundling content from distribution but what it should really be doing is rebundling content with audiences: Rebundling is where value capture will happen – at communities, reconstructors, markets, networks – that direct people’s attention to individualized ‘casts. This is where branding will be reborn – and where advertising is already being disrupted, ripped apart, and reborn (viz, Google, PPC, pay per call, etc) […]

  15. […] Now venture over to Steve Rubel’s Micropersuasion, where he got much deserved linkage for worrying that too many 2.0 media efforts are being supported by the ad spending of fellow (unprofitable but VC-backed) web 2.0 companies. That kind of rob-Peter-to-pay-Peter spending is, indeed, what inflated the last bubble and Steve wonders whether it is happening again. Valleywag assessed the risk to a few 2.0 media empires. This is why Scott Karp argues that we’d better start getting our act together and figure out how to provide the metrics that real advertisers with real money demand. Amen. This is also why I’ve been arguing — whistling in the wind of a leaking bubble, perhaps — that we need an open ad marketplace with both the metrics and the means to sell and accept real advertising. […]

  16. […] Political blogs in the UK are lashing together to create an ad network. That helps. But I’ll say it again and keep saying it: Advertisers won’t bother with a balkanized world of separate blog networks; we need an open ad marketplace to give them choice and control and to give us proper value. […]

  17. […] BuzzMachine » Ad Age column: The open ad marketplace Yet I hear advertisers dying to reach customers via influential blogs, and I hear bloggers dying to get their money. This infant medium is growing fast. Media research firm PQMedia’s just-released study of blogs, podcasts and RSS pegged 2005 ad spending at $20.4 million and forecast a 145% rise this year, to $49.8 million, with growth of ads on user-generated content expected to continue at an annual rate of 106% through 2010. […]

  18. […]  Jeff Jarvis thinks it’s time for a measurement summit to help figure out how to measure the new world of social media. I think it’s time for a measurement summit: Bring together the measurement companies, the advertisers and their agencies (buyers), the sites’ reps (sellers), the media sites, and technology companies and let’s hammer out some standards and methods for measurement. This will only work if we have open standards with analytics (like Comscore and Nielsen) building value atop that common data. Otherwise, we end up in a world that will continue to confuse and scare advertisers — and their money — away.Source: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » The need for a measurement summit […]

  19. […] media but that new media weren’t ready for them (as we indeed are not — see my AdAge column on the topic) — and so the advertisers are left without the means to market. In Chaos Scenario 2.0, […]

  20. […] the web, then I believe neat new things can happen — perhaps even the first steps toward the open-source ad network I’ve been pushing. I think this could become the basis of open competition with Google — not replacing Google […]

  21. […] the web, then I believe neat new things can happen — perhaps even the first steps toward the open-source ad network I’ve been pushing. I think this could become the basis of open competition with Google — not replacing Google but […]

  22. […] An open advertising infrastructure. Yes, I know that sounds antithetical to public-serving and -supported publishing. But the goal is […]

  23. […] long argued that we do, indeed, need competition in the ad market but it’s not going to come from […]

  24. […] quite ready for it, but once they see money sitting on the table, they’ll get ready fast (see my Ad Age piece on an open-source ad infrastructure for the distributed world). The day of […]

Leave a Comment