Good thing he invented it

Al Gore gives a rousing defense of network neutrality as nothing less than the key to protecting democracy. In an excerpt from his new book in Time, he begins with Iraq:

It is too easy–and too partisan–to simply place the blame on the policies of President George W. Bush. We are all responsible for the decisions our country makes. We have a Congress. We have an independent judiciary. We have checks and balances. We are a nation of laws. We have free speech. We have a free press. Have they all failed us? Why has America’s public discourse become less focused and clear, less reasoned? Faith in the power of reason–the belief that free citizens can govern themselves wisely and fairly by resorting to logical debate on the basis of the best evidence available, instead of raw power–remains the central premise of American democracy. This premise is now under assault.

American democracy is now in danger–not from any one set of ideas, but from unprecedented changes in the environment within which ideas either live and spread, or wither and die. I do not mean the physical environment; I mean what is called the public sphere, or the marketplace of ideas.

He then argues that we wasted too much time watching celebrity news, from J.J. to Paris. The result:

While American television watchers were collectively devoting 100 million hours of their lives each week to these and other similar stories, our nation was in the process of more quietly making what future historians will certainly describe as a series of catastrophically mistaken decisions on issues of war and peace, the global climate and human survival, freedom and barbarity, justice and fairness. For example, hardly anyone now disagrees that the choice to invade Iraq was a grievous mistake. Yet, incredibly, all of the evidence and arguments necessary to have made the right decision were available at the time and in hindsight are glaringly obvious.

That’s a logical leap not unlike the one that got us there: O.J. has done many bad things. But I hardly think we can blame him for getting us into Iraq, too.

Ah, but no, he’s really saying it’s television’s fault as it is exploited by a “new generation of media Machiavellis.” It’s a circuitous route, but I agree with where he lands: the value of an open internet. How we assure that, though, is still a matter of debate.

So the remedy for what ails our democracy is not simply better education (as important as that is) or civic education (as important as that can be), but the re-establishment of a genuine democratic discourse in which individuals can participate in a meaningful way–a conversation of democracy in which meritorious ideas and opinions from individuals do, in fact, evoke a meaningful response.

Fortunately, the Internet has the potential to revitalize the role played by the people in our constitutional framework. It has extremely low entry barriers for individuals. It is the most interactive medium in history and the one with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge. It’s a platform for pursuing the truth, and the decentralized creation and distribution of ideas, in the same way that markets are a decentralized mechanism for the creation and distribution of goods and services. It’s a platform, in other words, for reason. But the Internet must be developed and protected, in the same way we develop and protect markets–through the establishment of fair rules of engagement and the exercise of the rule of law. The same ferocity that our Founders devoted to protect the freedom and independence of the press is now appropriate for our defense of the freedom of the Internet. The stakes are the same: the survival of our Republic. We must ensure that the Internet remains open and accessible to all citizens without any limitation on the ability of individuals to choose the content they wish regardless of the Internet service provider they use to connect to the Web. We cannot take this future for granted. We must be prepared to fight for it, because of the threat of corporate consolidation and control over the Internet marketplace of ideas.

  • The passage of Net Neutrality would be the beginning of the end of the Internet’s potential to give us unprecedented free speech. When the printing press was invented, leaders chilled anti-government speech through licensing, prior restraint, and censorship. When broadcasting was invented, leaders chilled anti-government speech by licensing it, and making license renewals contingent upon programming that was “responsible” in their eyes. Net Neutrality invites the government into the Internet, where they will surely eventually chill our speech. When government elites like Al Gore start questioning whether our ideas are reasonable, it’s reasonable to be worried (Steve Boriss, The Future of News)

  • Geoff

    whats so funny about Al Gore inventing the internet….is that he actually never said it. and type in al gore and internet for the search and the rundown of how it all started is there. what gore didn’t do was refute the claim. that was stupid on his part.

  • Pug

    Al Gore saw the potential of the Internet long before any other politician. He might not have “invented” it, but he did introduce the legislation that opened it to the public after its beginning as a government project. He recognized early on what it could become.

    For his efforts he is endlessly ridiculed for claiming he “invented” the Internet. I guess that’s politics.

  • Greg0658

    a> Thank you Jeff for the point / focus / post.

    b> “NetNeutrality” at this point in time in my mind is not a “program” with defined rules and goals. Am I mistaken? To me it is the discussion of open access to the www across financial classes. Not a trade protection program.

    c> IMJ (in my judgement) the net needs to immerse Americans in voting on issues and away from voting on governors. Create the invoking of will (by referendum) and the implementor (by governor). This installs a stake for for the masses which will require knowledge and involvement. Desirable traits for a 21st Century people.

  • Ironically, Al Gore’s recent return to the world stage is basically a massive insult to the brains of thoughtful people, as he continues his lifelong pattern of dishonesty, exaggeration, and self-defeating U-turns. His relationship with “reason” has always been an adversarial one. His claims on “the information Superhighway” and many other imaginary achievements have been debunked since he managed to lose his home state in the 2000 election—-they know him all too well in Tennessee.

    He keeps saying he’s been on Global Warming for thirty years, and it’s just another Lyin’ Al exaggeration. The C-student studied climate around 30 years ago, but at that time Global COOLING was all the rage. He is a liar who eventually will once again get caught, though the MSM will exalt his virtues and ignore his lying, dishonest, silly past. This book aims at a boomlet that the MSM/Hollyweird cabal will inflate to grotesque dimensions.

    Clinton/Gore allowed 9/11 to happen after the first 1993 attempt fai1ed. Historians will note this even if the dishonest left-wing MSM will not.

  • Greg0658

    ps – I’m on another window posting a comment at another favorite site and the pipes are clogged. So I’ll add some words here.

    Example of part of the “NetNeutral” debate. IMO the web should be for data exchange. Not for HDTV transmission.

  • Pingback: Progressive Radio: Bruno and the Professor » Blog Archive » The Assault on the Internet()

  • Sigh.

    The story was a hit-piece by an agenda-driven Libertarian proselytizing yellow “journalist”, who gleeful worked with Republicans to smear Gore.

  • As others have mentioned, the “Al Gore: I invented the internet” story is a complete fabrication. One wonders why bitter partisan people pretending to be journalists keep using it in headlines.

  • On Gore and inventing the internet…

  • Geoff

    but Geoff…..not everyone knows that……ie, Wolf Blitzer, etc.

  • I think Gore’s message is right on target. daveinboca should invest heavily in local real estate, and a set of water-wings…

  • Rick

    Startling, how attention paid to Mr. Gore in nearly any venue brings out the dissemblers attacking with myths and lies, like they’re afraid of the guy and / or the inconvenient truths he reports.