Blog on stage

Blog on stage

: Riverbend, the Iraqi blog, is a play and The Times reviews it… lukewarmly. The problem isn’t the opinions (of course). What the critic complains about is the staging:

While Riverbend has a fascinating voice, this production, adapted by Kimberly I. Kefgen and Loren Ingrid Noveck, never makes the case for her blog as a piece of drama. What is lost is the sense of one singular, idiosyncratic personality, which, of course, is exactly what emerges so vividly from the blog. Instead of building a character, the show includes readings of her words from three women and one man, which adds to the muddled feel.

When not speaking, the actors pace in a triangle or perform synchronized gestures that make them look like backup singers to a 1960’s pop band.

: The Times notes that this is a new form: the blog play. And yes, I imagine that one or more people reciting a blog is not going to be compelling. For that misses the essence of blogging: conversation. How much better it would be to hear multiple voices — and multiple viewpoints — from the Baghdad bloggers: how they see the same scenes differently, how they disagree with each other, and how they link to each other.

: I also wonder whether the producers are paying Riverbend and, if so, whether they have contacted her and have confirmation that she is in Baghdad.

: See also Flickr photos here.

: And from the comments, I learn that she has a book coming from the Feminist Press.

26 responses to “Blog on stage”

  1. Alan Kellogg Avatar

    Plain recital sounds boring to me too. Some acting would be nice. Such as ‘rehearsing’ how one would present the material to a live audience. If I vbloged I’d be able to show you what I mean.
    It’s a matter of presentation, and plain recitation only works with the right voice and the right material.

  2. Richard Bennett Avatar

    This is the URL for the Times’ review of the pro-Saddam Riverbend blog play thing.

  3. Oliver Avatar

    So, Jeff, there are two sets of rules now for Iraqi blogs, huh? Such hypocrisy.

  4. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Ah, I love the smell of an Ollie Volley in the morning.
    Oliver: I meant what I said: I wonder whether they are paying her — whether they found her in Baghdad and paid her for her work. I’m standing up for the rights of Riverbend. And, yes, I’m simply curious whether she’s there. I said nothing to cast aspursions. I wondered. Anything wrong with wondering?
    My, you find snakes under every rock, don’t you?
    Richard: Thanks. fixed now.

  5. Oliver Avatar

    Jeff, you went nuts when Juan Cole, Eric Alterman and even I made similar questions about your beloved bloggers. Hypocrisy.

  6. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    No, Oliver, they said something quite different and you know it.

  7. Richard Bennett Avatar

    Riverbend is a Baathist stooge.

  8. Quentin Avatar

    Riverbend’s most recent post on Sistani and Chalabi is sublime. She’s a literary gem. Her take on the misery of the people of Baghdad is black, piercing, enlightening. But I don’t think I’d be interested in seeing the play either. A book of her’s is coming out next month: see Amazon. Free advertising, whoops. Maybe Amazon will pay me.

  9. Richard Bennett Avatar

    Forgive me, I should have said “Riverbend is a sublime Baathist stooge.”
    We can’t go selling her literary talents short.

  10. C Bassett Avatar
    C Bassett

    So many false hypocrisy alarms today. Better sensors, please.

  11. paul_lukasiak Avatar

    Plain recital sounds boring to me too. Some acting would be nice.
    the problem with the play, as i understand it, is that it really should have been a “one woman” performance. The producers tried to make Riverbend’s singular voice represent a far larger perspective, which does an injustice not only to Riverbend herself, but to the diversity of opinion of Iraqis themselves. (Sure, the concept of having different actors represent different aspects of the same person is theatrically valid—see, for example, recently opened and well reviewed Play Without Words–but nothing I’ve read suggests that is why the multiple actor device was chosen.)
    A well edited and performed one woman show based on Riverbend’s blogs would be a coup d’theatre of the first order. Indeed, Susan Saradon could probably earn herself a Tony if she took a play based on Riverbend’s blog to Broadway!

  12. Yehudit Avatar

    “A well edited and performed one woman show based on Riverbend’s blogs would be a coup d’theatre of the first order.”
    It’s been done.

  13. paul_lukasiak Avatar

    It’s been done.
    no it hasn’t. The show you linked to is more akin to Lily Tomlin’s “Search for Intelligent Life” (a work of ‘fiction’ in which she plays multiple characters) than to something like “The Importance of Being Oscar”, which takes the writing of a single person and builds a show around it.
    (and yeah, i’m quibbling! )

  14. Kathy K Avatar

    Yehudit… if that lady did Riverbend, and came near my city, I’d go see it.
    Riverbend, despite the fact that I find her worldview fairly offputting, is a singular woman. Having multiple people, some of the opposite sex, quoting her writings is ridiculous… almost insulting. Her ‘voice’ is distinctly female and unique.
    Ideally, she should do a one-woman show herself.

  15. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Kathy: I agree. Well said.

  16. button Avatar

    Maybe they should have asked Eric Begosian to adapt it; he does that sort of thing well, no?

  17. CharlesWT Avatar
    CharlesWT

    Riverbend gives the impression that she spent several years before the war surfing AntiWar, Democratic Underground, IndyMedia, MoveOn, etc. Or maybe she’s just a quick study. She certainly can parrot many of their mantras almost word for word. And she gives the impression that she thinks Juan Cole is the expert on Iraq outside of Iraq. However, she is sharp writer who is almost always engrossing in spite of some hysterical whinnying; an affinity for here-say, roomers, conspiracy theories and the ability to see the dark clouds behind every sliver lining. She’s a must read if only as a counterpoint to most of the other Iraqi blogs.

  18. MisterPundit Avatar

    Riverbend is a Baathist stooge.
    Agreed. Her idiotic ramblings leaves the impression she is more than just a little ticked off about the fact that power and privilege in Iraq no longer belongs to just 20% of the population. Tough nuts.

  19. EverKarl Avatar
    EverKarl

    Jeff,
    Ollie is just mad at you because you were right about the Iraq war deposing a tyrant and bringing freedom to tens of millions of people who suffered under that despotic regime.

  20. Oliver Avatar

    If any of that were true I would agree with Jeff. But none of it is.

  21. Ad Hominus Avatar
    Ad Hominus

    Considering what takes place at Oliver’s blog, I’ll stay here. A sample:
    George Bush = a loser (mommy slam included)
    Republican Party = corrupt
    Tom Delay = ethically bankrupt
    House Republicans = corrupt
    GOP = corrupt
    Jeff Jarvis = hypocritical
    Republican Party = national ghouls (racist charge included)
    Tom Delay = corrupt
    Republicans = slippery + intellectually dishonest
    Harry Reid = dumb
    Schiavo family = deluded
    Kevin Drum = divorced from reality
    And that was only on Saturday.
    It’s a blogging version of MadLibs, no pun intended.

  22. Eileen Avatar

    I think Oliver is just craving a little link love. Lonesome, Ollie?

  23. Richard Bennett Avatar

    If any of that were true I would agree with Jeff. But none of it is.
    What part isn’t true:
    1. Iraq war deposed a tyrant: TRUE.
    2. Iraq war brought freedom to tens of millions: TRUE.
    3. Tens of millions suffered under Saddam: TRUE.
    4. Saddam was a despot: TRUE.
    Obviously, Ollie is a fraud, perhaps not one on the order of his boss and role model David Brock, but a fraud nonetheless.

  24. Richard Bennett Avatar

    Back to Riverbend, I can appreciate good writing from points of view that disagree with, but there’s nothing in her writing to recommend itself. It’s rambling, self-absorbed, incoherent, and generally tangential to the important issues taking place in Iraq.
    Her take on the recent elections was to write them off as nothing more than a great inconvenience because of the long lines. I doubt that anybody who doesn’t live in San Francisco Mission District coffee houses saw them that way; it’s likely that the only Baghdad she knows is the one by the Frisco Bay.

  25. EverKarl Avatar
    EverKarl

    “I think Oliver is just craving a little link love. Lonesome, Ollie?”
    Eileen, you have to ask?
    Everone else, take note that Ollie’s position is that the invasion of Iraq did not depose a tyrant and did not free tens of millions of people. Like Kryptonite to reality.

  26. PW Avatar

    “the problem with the play, as i understand it, is that it really should have been a “one woman” performance.” – Posted by paul_lukasiak at March 19, 2005 06:56 PM
    Well that would be the problem according to the reviewer in the New York Times, but his opinion doesn’t necessarily mean that it is in fact a problem. I would say more often than not New York Times reviews are completely off-base, basing their judgements not on the quality of the work, but whether their “readership” would want to see it. I can’t speak for all New Yorkers, but most of the intelligent people that I know in this city disregard the times, since it is completely out of touch. More New Yorkers get there news from NY1 than the Times, for sure…
    Personally I like to see plays first before suggesting how to “fix” them.