The Eason Jordan story

The Eason Jordan story

: Still, there’s no coverage in big media of the Eason Jordan story to ask whether the CNN exec said that journalists were targeted by soldiers in Iraq — and whether they were, indeed, targeted. Either way, there should be coverage. If he said it and believes any part of it, then that is a vital story that must be reported. If he didn’t say it or doesn’t believe it, then he needs to clarify with the questioning of reporters and/or bloggers. Either way, this is news.

: Sisyphus did what any reporter and/or blogger should do and got on the horn to Davos to ask for a tape of the session. It’s on the way, they say. Then we’ll have what Jordan in fact said and then he can clarify in the context of the source material that started this story.

: Hugh Hewitt writes a memo to Jay Rosen and me telling us to cover this. I wrote about it three days before Hugh’s memo. Jay has written about it, too:

* I can think of no good reason for the major news media not to investigate what Jordan said, and what he meant by it. It is somewhat surprising to me that we haven’t seen a story from either a journalist who was in Davos, or a media beat reporter like Mark Jurkowitz of the Boston Globe, Jacques Steinberg of the New York Times, or Howard Kurtz, who of course works for CNN. The event was on-the-record, and a tape was made. There are no obvious obstacles to investigating further.

* Possibly the reason we haven’t seen the coverage is that they’re waiting for the tape, as bloggers are. But it is also possible that Eason Jordan’s comments tipped the press off to a bigger story involving the deaths of journalists, and the protests from news organizations.

* CNN made sure many bloggers who were posting about Jordan’s comments had copies of a statement the network put out. (Many of the bloggers were startled to receive the communique out of the blue. See this.) That in itself is significant. Someone there is watching the blogs on this one.

: Rebecca MacKinnon is tracking this story about her former boss.

: LATER: Jay Rosen has more on Jordan’s job as the diplomat for the state of CNN.

18 responses to “The Eason Jordan story”

  1. yolanda Avatar

    Is this true? Is the US holding a former Al Jazeera journalist at Guantanamo?
    Mubanga remains deeply concerned about some of the prisoners he met in Guant

  2. J. Peden Avatar

    The CIA is behind it, the whole damn thing whatever it is.

  3. LT Avatar

    LMAO
    LT

  4. LT Avatar

    Its a huge conspiracy, and everyone there is actually innocent.

  5. /pd Avatar

    Jeff: So True !! I quietly took this story from source and blogged it here. Blogsphere has caught this story, yet no chatter on MSM’s. I also used to follow KevinSites and after he blow the story in Iraq, he went underground and then reassigned in the FarEast !! This seems to me– its a nice co-incidence ..in light of the Davos line !!
    Yes, the tape is important !! VERY important.. :)-

  6. Zed Avatar

    Eason Jordan searches are still very heavy in google, I’ve used the name as a keyword for adwords – a few hundred impressions just in the late night/early morning hours alone.

  7. J. Peden Avatar

    Mubanga flew over the Guantanamo cuckoo’s nest, apparently fully populated with captured Journalists, to bring us their message – courtesy of Scott Burgess at The Daily Ablution:
    Burgess: “Fortunately,… readers get to sample a bit of Mr. Mubanga’s undoubted masterpiece (Untitled):
    ‘Dem labelled me a terrorist
    ‘Calling me a thug.
    ‘Dem labelled me a terrorist
    ‘Calling me a slug… But I never did join bin Laden’s crew anyway
    ‘And now me know to be a Muslim is a hard core ting…
    ‘And I got no love for the American government
    ‘Dey can go suck and I don’t mean peppermint.’
    Such power.”

  8. paul_lukasiak Avatar

    ya gotta love the wingnuts….
    we held people without charges for three years at Guantanamo because there was nothing to charge them with. When they are finally released, they talk of torture taking place at Guantanamo—and the wingnuts make fun of the allegations.
    and they wonder why Americans are so hated by the Islamic world….

  9. EverKarl Avatar

    Of course! We should have released all of those captured on the field of combat, so they could return, terrorize their countries and kill Americans. Because then paul would be able to blame that on Bush, too.
    There was nothing to charge them with because this is a war, not a criminal prosecution. The U.S. tried handling terrorism that way and thousands of people died in the WTC for it.

  10. Kat Avatar

    They hated us long before George Bush. Have you read the Freedom House Study about those nice muslims and their houses of hatred in the USA? Yeah, I know why they hate the USA, the question is, do you? The report is here in PDF form. Enjoy.
    http://freedomhouse.org/religion/publications/Saudi%20Report/FINAL%20FINAL.pdf
    Dallas Morning News: Anti-U.S. materials found at mosques.
    Anti-Jewish and anti-American propaganda published by the Saudi Arabian government has been on display at U.S. mosques, according to an American human rights group.
    The publications

  11. Paul Avatar

    Kat,
    You must understand that your garden variety moonbat is so ignorant and self centered that they can ONLY conceive of someone hating America for the same reason that he, she, it, does.
    It’s the standard lefty Marxist evil capitalist-exploitation model. That’s about as far as they can think. In fact I’ve never talked to one who’s even read UBL’s fatwa, let alone Qutb, so expecting them to actually understand why Islamofascists hate us is out of the question.
    They’re irredeemably stupid, but fortunately utterly impotent and irrelevant, and the louder they wail and gnash their teeth the faster the electorate will run from them.

  12. Mork Avatar

    What’s the story here? If he meant that he had evidence that the U.S. military attacked journalists, the I agree that it would be a huge story.
    But it’s obvious that it’s not the case.
    That leaves two possibilities: his original comments were misinterpreted (which seems entirely possible from the reports I’ve read), or he said something that he immediately wished he hadn’t and backed away from it.
    Neither of those two possibilities is remotely newsworthy.
    Obviously, what’s really happening here is that the warnut bloggers see the opportunity to blow this up into yet another faux “scandal” that gives them a platform for their efforts to deligitimize any news outlet that tells them anything other than they want to hear.
    And that’s not news, either.

  13. Paul Avatar

    Let’s see…if CNN’s chief news executive accuses the US military of deliberately targeting and mudering journalists it’s newsworthy if it is indeed true, but if he merely lies about it in front of an international audience it’s not newsworthy?
    I guess to a lefty moonbat such egregious lies and slander are so offhand and commonplace that they don’t deserve a second thought. But to normal, sane people this is an outrage.
    If the video reveals that he did in fact say this it will be a very big story, rest assured.

  14. paul_lukasiak Avatar

    Lets see now….the US lies about the circumstances surrounding the attack on the Palestine hotel, and the same day that hotel is attacked two other buildings that the US knew were being used by Arab news organizations were also bombed.
    and its all just a big “coincidence”….

  15. paul_lukasiak Avatar

    There was nothing to charge them with because this is a war, not a criminal prosecution. The U.S. tried handling terrorism that way and thousands of people died in the WTC for it.
    people died at the WTC because 10 guys with utility knives were able to get through US security. And they were able to do that because Bush virtually ignore the threat posed by international terrorism until 9/11.
    If the US captured these people on the battlefield, and they were fighting on behalf of the Taliban, then they should be released under international law because that war is over. The US failed to make a distinction between those who — like the foreign fighters that we supported when Russia invaded Afghanistan — went to defend Afghanistan from “infidel invaders”, and actual terrorists. Just because someone went to Afghanistan to fight against a US invasion of a Muslim nations does not mean that they would travel to the US to commit terrorist acts.
    By treating these people like they are terrorists, we are creating new terrorists. In ten or fifteen years time, we may well be dealing with a situation that makes 9-11 look like child’s play, as the sons and daughters of these people grow up with an all-consuming hatred of the USA.

  16. Angus Jung Avatar
    Angus Jung

    So what kind of catering do you do?

  17. Mork Avatar

    Let’s see…if CNN’s chief news executive accuses the US military of deliberately targeting and mudering journalists it’s newsworthy if it is indeed true, but if he merely lies about it in front of an international audience it’s not newsworthy?
    But Paul, he didn’t … or at least, he isn’t. When he was asked to clarify, he immediately made it clear that he wasn’t making that accusation.
    Your position is akin to accusing President Bush of flip-flopping on introducing a draft on the basis of his slip of the toungue during the campaign.
    The charitable interpretation of your position is that you are cynically attempting to manufacutre a controversy to smear someone you want to discredit for unrelated reasons. Because if you really believe what you’re saying, you’re a fricken idiot.

  18. Kat Avatar

    Paul–and how should we treat terrorists? You are what you are and a Gallop Poll says 15% in the world are muslim terrorists–that is 180 million adults, and you can bet your burka the kids are educated in hatred and jihadism.
    We all know 911 was planned long before Bush. We all know that the more Clinton turned the other cheek, the harder they slapped it .
    * The first World Trade Center bombing on February 26, 1993, Clinton did nothing
    * 10 months later in Mogadishu, Sowmalia..(won’t let me spell it correctly because of questionable content(s–o–m–a. an attack on American military forces who were in country to bring food to starving Sowmalis, eighteen American soldiers were killed and the body of one was dragged through the streets in a gesture designed to formally humiliate the world