It’s not an ‘either-or’ medium, Jason, it’s an ‘and’ medium

It’s not an ‘either-or’ medium, Jason, it’s an ‘and’ medium

: Jason Calacanis — who is the single most competitive person I’ve ever met … and that roster includes Bill Gates — sends me email and a blog comment sputtering because I dared to mention CES coverage from Gizmodo and Engadget in the same blog breath, after Gizmodo got an interview with Gates (even though I gave Engadget twice the links this week and do think Engadget’s Pete Rojas et al have done a great job). He fumes:

give me a break…

we did 3-4x the traffic of gizmodo, and we did 4x the number of updates

we had 9 people at the show… nick had one

not even close to competition.. .even with the gates interview

I respond: “Relax.” And he responds:

relax? not in my vocab… :-)

you’re always pumping up Nick… so objective of you… can’t wait till you liquidate that Moreover stock and can stop kissing his ass!

I wish I were his therapist. I’d be rich, I tell you, rich!

For the full-disclosure record, I sit on Moreover’s board but do not own Moreover stock and have cashed no options. Nick’s a friend. And, yes, I admire the quality of Nick’s work. I also like, Jason. But that’s not the point. Neither is being No. 1.

Jason is misunderstanding the essence of this new medium. In big, old media — in the age of the power law — only the top guy or maybe the top two won because only the top guys could afford the printing press and the marketing budget. It’s an ‘either-or’ industry.

In this new medium, if you’re alone, you lose, for there’s no one to link to; it’s lonely at the top when you’re the only guy there. This new medium is more like a mall, where having more stores, even competitors, in the same place is better for everybody: better for the “consumers” who get more places to click to, and better for the clickees. This is an “and” medium.

So it’s good for readers that we have both Engadget and Gizmodo covering CES, not to mention Paid Content and I just found some neat stuff at UberGizmo — plus Rihooligan’s and, of course, big media. (Note that you can pretty much cover CES via the PR Newswire.)

It’s also going to be better for every player in the medium, I contend, when they set up ad networks that deliver critical mass of audience across multiple sites to marketers. So competitors will need to cooperate to make more money, or else advertisers won’t bother.

So if I were you, Jason, I’d be glad to Gizmodo and PaidContent were there alongside you — and I’d try to set up an ad network with them, rather than lash out at them. That’s so old media, man.

And when are you going to start the Valium Blog?

: Oh, and by the way, in the original post, I said that Gizmodo had Bill Gates and Engadget had the sexiest geek goddess around on video, even). Who do you think won that post?

: UPDATE: Jason next tackles Steve Jobs. And Felix Salmon tackles that.

14 responses to “It’s not an ‘either-or’ medium, Jason, it’s an ‘and’ medium”

  1. Kat Avatar

    Well, I’d take Bill Gates.

  2. Jason Avatar

    uhhhh….
    1. that wasn’t a public email Jeff. you should ask before printing a personal email.
    2. I never said anything bad about Paidcontent or Gizmodo. Both are fine sites.
    3. The whole concept of Weblogs, Inc is “and” not “or.” If it were or we would not have 70 blogs and 45 bloggers working with us.
    4. so, you own options not stock.. great. You still give props to Nick over Weblogs, Inc. at 10 to 1 ratio.
    5. you said “Note that you can pretty much cover CES via the PR Newswire.” You could, and your coverage would be horrible. We are taking hundreds of images, hours of video and having first hand opinion of the content. You can NOT do that from a press release. Really.
    6. You said “So competitors will need to cooperate to make more money, or else advertisers won’t bother.” We already have put together 70 blogs, so we are doing this right now.
    7. You said “Jason is misunderstanding the essence of this new medium. In big, old media — in the age of the power law — only the top guy or maybe the top two won because only the top guys could afford the printing press and the marketing budget. It’s an ‘either-or’ industry.”
    No, I understand the new medium just fine Jeff. My only point is that I think you give Nick tons and tons of props and diss Weblogs, Inc. and Engadget.
    anyway, i still love you… just wish you would cash in those options and stop giving Nick all the props… maybe I should just give you some options in Weblogs, Inc?
    best j

  3. Ben Sparks Avatar
    Ben Sparks

    >>> I wish I were his therapist.
    >>> I’d be rich, I tell you, rich!
    ummmm… you’re no already?

  4. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Jason:
    As I just said to you in email….
    The rules of engagement on this blog clearly state, “Any email sent to me can be quoted on the blog.” Keep the email coming.
    I didn’t say you said anything bad about PaidContent or Gizmodo. I didn’t say anything bad about Engadget, either. But you didn’t like that I said something nice about Gizmodo — even though I’d already said something nice about Engadget’s CES coverage earlier. Still, you sent a frothing email and posted a frothing comment.
    And you expect me not to reply?
    Maybe I give props to Nick because he does good sites that interest me. It’s a blog, man. I link to what I want to link to.
    I don’t link to your Grid Computing blog because that doesn’t interest me (apparently, it doesn’t interest the blogger, either, since its last update was Dec. 16). I don’t like to either of your gaming blogs for the same reason. Ditto cars. So shoot me.
    You don’t understand what I’m saying re “and.” I’m saying — as I have said to you before — that I think to really prosper, bloggers need to form networks outside their own companies to create critical mass for advertising. It’s cool if you don’t agree. But that’s what I’m saying.

  5. Jackie Danicki Avatar

    Jason, I don’t think you do understand blogging if you’re reading Jeff’s blog and scrutinising the ratio of props he gives your blogs versus the props he gives other blogs. Have you entertained the possibility that not all blogs are equal, and that your blogs in particular might not be – in the eyes of Jeff or any other reader or blogger – as deserving of praise as other blogs are?
    Isn’t producing solid content on a consistent basis vastly more important than calculating props ratios on Buzzmachine? If not, no wonder you’re not getting as many props.
    The network is always stronger than the node.

  6. paul Avatar

    I enjoy reading Jason’s stuff, but he doesn’t understand what a blog is. Weblogs INC. is more of a multi-media-zine-wanta-be.

  7. Jayme Maultasch Avatar

    I think Jeff’s point that there is room for more than one gadget site is correct. I read all my blogs via RSS using Newsgator Online. I have Engadget and Gizmodo sorted together into a folder labeled Gadgets. I often read the two feeds together as one by just clicking on the folder. I see Jason’s point that Engadget’s coverage of CES has been phenomenal and therefore deserves the only link but it’s Jeff’s blog so his call. Thanks to Engadget for the kick ass CES coverage – I think the sheer volume and quality of work will get you the credit your seeking whether Jeff links to Gizmodo or not!

  8. Jackie Danicki Avatar

    I see Jason’s point that Engadget’s coverage of CES has been phenomenal and therefore deserves the only link
    What is this, a fight over the last animal cracker in kindergarten?

  9. Bryan Avatar

    I enjoy both sites. I think Jason is just a little crushed — while Engadget’s coverage of CES is great, Gizmodo scored Bill Gates, which I can only assume disturbs Jason after all the work that has gone into Engadget in the past 8 months. Maybe it was that magneto screenshot that ruined their chances. I am sure if it was the other way around Nick would be a little crushed as well. Hey Jason you made the cover of Fortune – Nick did not.

  10. Op-Eddie Avatar
    Op-Eddie

    Disturbing, but not unusual, behavior from Jason. (I know, I used to work for him and I honestly believe the condition is medical.) He froths like a rabid dog at any chance he gets. Hyper-defensive, over-reactionary, and cry-baby are just a few of the hyphenated ways to describe his behavior. It’s very sad to see a grown man act like a child who has no place in an adult world of business and blogging. (Anyone remember his insane IM incident with the Gothamist guy? We’re talking looney tunes, people.) You don’t have to be a psychoanalyst to detect a pattern here.
    Jeff *clearly* demonstrates his praise for Engadget but when Jason perceives anything remotely “negative” (even when it’s not – in this case he went so far to whine about the *absence* of MORE praise) he goes into attack mode and unfortunately the only thing he succeeds in crushing is his own credibility. Jeff’s opinion is widely respected on many topics but get real, he’s not the high altar of gadget blog punditry and was just offering his two cents. That’s what blogs do. Jason’s demand for equal representation is misguided and delusional. And he says he understands the new medium just fine? Clearly he hasn’t a clue.
    Interesting point in all of this is how Weblogs Inc is essentially ONE successful blog carrying the deadweight of 70+ others and that one blog (Engadget of course) was actually stolen overnight from Nick Denton’s Gawker Media in the first place! Jason, between the ethical grandstanding and just plain dirty business tactics, do you ever find the time to produce a good original thought on your own?
    Fine, let’s congratulate you on your outstanding CES coverage, affirmation you so desperately need, but you sent 9 people and Gizmodo just had the one editor? Tell me, why then did you have only 4x as many posts and 3-4x as much traffic? I’m no math major but something doesn’t add up. I suppose we should tip our hats and marvel at the Gizmodo editor. Imagine if he just had an extra person or two helping out!
    God knows if Jason has a winning business model or not, time will tell, but this much is obvious: he has a losing personality. Until he learns to calm down and focus on what’s important he will continue to be an object of scorn and ridicule in the blogging world. Here are two words for you Jason that will serve as the best business advice you’ll ever receive: shut up.

  11. Karl Avatar

    I’m not getting into the whole Endgadget vs Gizmodo thing…
    But some falsehoods that keep getting spread need some correcting:
    Please read Clay Shirky:
    http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/01/13/inequality.php
    Fact: There *are* power laws that effect internet traffic and content distribution – they have a different method for their operation – (the hyperlink) – but they exist.
    Fact: You can post like a mad man – with quality – and it might not make a whit of difference: The sites that link to you – and how they link to you – matter. They matter a lot.
    I know it’s sad to recognize these facts – but Google’s accuracy is determined by algorithms that utilize them.
    In the end though – Jeff is right about cross promotion between Gizmodo and Engadget. That would help Engadget a ton. Only *then* will maybe the best content win.

  12. jake Avatar

    the power law distributions are not immutable- in fact, just the opposite. if you stop posting regularly, or start posting crap, your site traffic nosedives in about three months (or less.) people stop reading, and people stop linking.
    it also works visa-versa: if you are doing great stuff, and posting frequently, linking out to other good sources, you will get noticed and traffic goes up quickly. of course, going up takes a little longer than going down- i’d give it about a year to see a major increase.
    and regarding bad behavior by JMC, best to just laugh it off and steer clear.

  13. Karl Avatar

    Yep Jake, you’re absolutely right. One of the great things about the hyperlink is just how easy it is to give one, and take one away.
    “if you are doing great stuff, and posting frequently, linking out to other good sources, you will get noticed and traffic goes up quickly. of course, going up takes a little longer than going down- i’d give it about a year to see a major increase.”
    What happens, hopefully, is that folks start linking to your work (getting noticed requires folks to link to you) with link text Google (and now other search engines I’m sure) can use.
    “if you stop posting regularly, or start posting crap, your site traffic nosedives in about three months (or less.) people stop reading, and people stop linking.”
    Permalinks with quality work posted regularly are soooo important. So many just don’t get that. Each permalink is another opportunity that someone will reference your work.

  14. Hello Avatar

    Well, I’m late to this one. But I just want to say, for the record, that while I have never met “Jason Cana-whatever,” I’ve just spent some time Googling and reading and picking up the vibes, and the guy sounds like a completely dork. Not in a good way. Like, somebody way in over his head, thinking he’s living out some sort of fantasy.
    Here’s a hint: You’re not gonna make a living on the Internet, dude. You’re just not. You don’t seem to understand what journalism is, either.