Transparency

Transparency

: The news business demands transparency of the world it covers and now has to learn to be transparent itself. They’re not taking to the lesson easily.

After Rathergate, CBS should be opening all its doors and drawers to rebuild its credibility. But RatherBiased.com reports that some execs do not want to release the full investigative report on Rathergate being done now. That’ would be numbnutty in the extreme.

And Dan Okrent writes in today’s NY Times Public Editor column that Times editors are having problems learning that they should be talking about the paper with the paper’s public.

Here’s an idea: if the editors did the explaining themselves, maybe I wouldn’t have to do it for them.

For decades, the Fraternal Order of Falsely Modest Newspaper People has marched under an indelible banner: “We’re not the story,” it says. “The story’s the story.” …

I suppose the speak-for-itself trope made sense back when the image of the American newspaper was embodied in a freckled newsboy tossing a rolled paper onto a porch hung with geraniums. But in an age when the press is so widely regarded as a predatory and uncontrolled beast, the failure to allow readers a view inside the cage can only aggravate their worst suspicions.

2 responses to “Transparency”

  1. P. Ingemi Avatar

    I disagree.
    The report on CBS is going to be deadly for them. There are two groups they have to worry about:
    The right already doubts them, this report will most likely confirm things already believed. It will not cost them “eyeballs” with this group since it does not watch.
    The left however has a vested interest in not knowing the truth about this. What was President Reagan’s term? “Plausable Deniability”. As long as the left can claim that it was a single “rogue producer” then it can maintain the illusion of CBS as an impartial source of news and its foes as nuts. If the report however comes out in full then the left is in the position where it has to either defend or condemn.
    It doesn’t want to condemn as it is an ally, but if the report is damning it will not want to defend, and pay with their own good names.
    Unless they plan to make wholesale changes there is only downside, and a cost of the eyeballs of those who are with them.
    So in my opinion it is not a foolish thing for them to hold back. I don’t think it is the right thing, but it is not foolish.

  2. Bob Kohn Avatar

    Where was the transparency when a Chattanooga Times Free Press reporter fed his carefully crafted question to a soldier to deliver to Rumsfeld? At the event, Pitts, the reporter, had an opportunity to tell his fellow reporters about his role in the question.
    Bob Kohn
    http://bobkohn.blogspot.com