The world changes in a click

The world changes in a click

: I saw the world change last night.

Spirit of America showed its new Arabic-language blogging tool at a reception in Washington.

soalogo.gifI have been hoping, dreaming, cajoling, and begging for this for more than a year, since I first met Hossein Derakhshan online and saw the blogging revolution he started in Iran and since I met, also online, brave Iraqi bloggers Zeyad and then Omar and Mohamed and others and read the stories of their true lives they brought to the world.

I believed that a tool of citizens’ media in the languages of the citizens would free them to tell their stories to each other and the world and dethrone the tyrants who have tried to silence them. Now it begins.

Spirit of America — Jim Hake, Kerry Dupont, Janice Abrahams, and some brave people in Iraq (more on them later) — made it happen. This weekend at Rebecca MacKinnon’s international blogging confab at Harvard, they’ll unveil this tool, but I got to see it tonight.

And though I could not, of course, understand a single word, a single letter on the pages, I saw pixels that looked as beautiful to me as the graceful, courageous, ancient script on the Declaration of Independence.

With this tool, citizens throughout the Middle East will be able to declare their independence. They will be able to build bridges to fellow citizens in other parts of the world — just as the Iraqi and Iranian bloggers have been able to do (allowing you and me to meet and make friends in a way that never could have happened without this). They will be able to tell the truth in ways that media cannot and their leaders will not.

Deputy Secretary of State Paul Wolfowitz came to tonight’s reception, along with some members of Congress. I thanked Wolfowitz for reading blogs from Iraq and quoting them in columns and drawing attention to their messages in the halls of power. Then I asked him whether they are making a difference. “Yes, but not as much as they deserve to,” he said.

He told of reading a blog that reported on religous organizations that were really just fronts for Saddam and how he did not see this same coming from U.S. intelligence for too long.

Later, I said that the same is true in media. I told him the story of the antiterrorism demonstrations that Zeyad, Omar, and Mohamed covered that The New York Times did not cover.

The priesthoods of information are being upset, I said. We agreed that this is a good thing.

Secretary Wolfowitz said that citizens’ blogs in Iraq are helping. “Things that every Iraqi knows, Americans have to learn for the first time through the barriers of the Green Zone,” he said. He said that not only has he quoted blogs and learned intelligence from them, but he “got a lot of mileage in Congress” out of blogs stories of religious women’s objections to efforts to impose religous law in Iraq a few months ago. He is grateful for what the bloggers are telling us and he is grateful for their courage.

And, by the way, Wolfowitz himself reads blogs, he and his staff members made clear. He regularly sends them links to what he has learned online. (And, by the way, I enjoyed meeting him.)

When I asked that question about blogs, I mentioned the blogs in Iran and Rep. Darrell Issa of California was amazed that there were blogs there. I told him the story of Hoder and the blogging revolution and he remained amazed. “I missed that briefing,” he said. No, Congressman, you just got the briefing, I told him.

They see how these tools will change the world. But you already had that briefing, didn’t you?

All of this is not just a plug for contributing to this cause and helping bring the Arabic blogging tool to Arabic lands. But it is also a plug. So please give to the cause here. Help some brave people change the world.

: UPDATE: Judith rounds up other reports here.

8 responses to “The world changes in a click”

  1. AndrewBB Avatar

    “Priesthoods of information.” The implied connection is offense.
    Issa was pulling your crank when he said “I missed that briefing” if you are “quoting” him accurately.
    Other than that, I see a somewhat basic hole in the argument that a blogging tool will start a revolution. This whole effort for Iranian bloggers came about because Westerners could read what was written. Obviously they can and will take it from here, but how much interest will they gain from the West (and how can we be informed?) if few can read them?
    Yes, I realize that Westerners understanding the blogs isn’t the point, but still …
    Can you also point specifically to why an Arabian blogging tool as you call it has garnered so much attention? I mean Issa and Wolfowitz? Isn’t blogging just writing online? And can’t that be done now? Why is a blogging (read writing) tool so important for a digitial revolution?
    In other words, blogging took off as a cultural phenom with the advent of Blogger, but before blogger the big ideas were still out there; the information was there.
    These are sincere questions.

  2. Dishman Avatar

    I’d say it’s a big deal because it lowers the perceived cost of entry. It creates a visible gateway for entry.
    This was also a way for SoA to bring together Wolfowitz, Issa and the Alis. Among other things, it presented an opportunity for Wolfowitz to acknowledge their legitimacy.

  3. Yehudit Avatar

    Roundup of reports on the NYC visit. (Scroll down past mine for links to the others.)

  4. soup Avatar

    Excellent post Jeff, you are definitely the journablogger.

  5. oodja Avatar

    Can you also point specifically to why an Arabian blogging tool as you call it has garnered so much attention? I mean Issa and Wolfowitz? Isn’t blogging just writing online?
    It’s a question of who controls the portal, and to what end. Right now there’s nothing stopping an Afghan, Iraqi, or other netizen in the Arab world from using a free service such as blogspot. A great example of a successful Iraqi blog hosted on blogspot is Baghdad Burning by “River”. Of course what River and most other indy Iraqi bloggers have to say most of the time either contradicts the official information about how great life is in Iraq these days, so naturally the Powers That Be would want to back a blogging initiative can counteract all this bad indy online press.
    Now mind you, I think it’s just peachy that there are organizations such as Spirit of America attempting to inject freedom of speech and democratic discourse into the Middle East. But what is to stop Spirit of America from monitoring and/or censoring the political content of the blogs it “hosts”? Organizations like Blogger make their terms of service very clear. As of yet, I see no such declaration of committment to the principles of freedom of speech on Spirit of America’s mission statement for its blogging tool, so color me skeptical.

  6. J. Peden Avatar

    AndrewBB, I don’t know if I am correctly interpreting what you are saying, but will avail myself to take off on it anyway:
    It is strange to assume that everyone knows or has access to every idea just because it is already “out there”. Actually the claim that ” the big ideas were still out there” is false. Or, to paraphrase Rumsfeld on the unknown, there are some unknowns we know we don’t know, and some unknowns we don’t know we don’t know. This goes for ideas and information.
    Imho, Rumsfeld speaks to the unknown and to the creativity of free thought, [as well as to the unknownness of events] which can be abetted by practice and thought mating, such as occurs through blogging at an exponential rate.
    Furthermore, although free thought is the ultimate goal, capitalism is by far the best mechanism for wealth creation, and thus the only proven hope for saving the world’s economic/standard-of-living problems.
    Capitalism depends upon free thought finding the unknown, even though no one knows what this is.
    Now there’s a bunch of ideas which are “out there”, though you may think it has the meaning in this case of “being crazy”.
    But by my argument the “blogging tool” is seen as a potentially wonderful extention of the capitalistic-free thought axis to a part of the world needing it.
    Spirit of America/Friends of Democracy is either capitalistic or certainly reverent of free thought – probably both. I’m going to give the bastards some money.
    North Korea is next!

  7. AndrewBB Avatar

    Thanks for the answers. J. Peden is a little further afield then my question and a little confusing, as well. I was merely saying writing is writing, and “if people are looking” people will find information, regardless of a tool that makes the writign easier but does’t make finding the information easier.
    I also wonder why it had to be called “Spirit of America.” It seems greatly paternalistic.

  8. Ahmed Avatar

    Arab bloggers are already emerging without this tool. Check out this: http://www.arablogger.com to find a lot of Arab blogs in Arabic and English. I write my blog in English and I think it is the perfect way to connect with the world.