Blog ethics

Blog ethics

: My sneaky friend Nick Denton nominated me to join Jason Calicanis in setting up a Blog Ethics Committee. I had to let this sink in. Here’s my response:

We don’t need a committee. We don’t need an authority figure or moral guidepost.

This is a distributed world, a world owned by the whole. We are ruled by the wisdom of the crowd.

The most I might go for would be a blog ethics wiki, in which all bloggers get the chance to contribute their collective wisdom and conscience to a debate over what’s right.

Besides, the rules of ethics in publishing are really quite simple. As they relate to advertising, I’d start here:

1. No one can buy your editorial voice or space.

2. Anything that is bought should be clearly identified so the audience would not be confused about its source.

3. Be transparent about any relationships you have that could affect what you say and about anything you receive related to what you say.

4. Be open. Be honest.

That pretty much covers the waterfront. If you get more specific than that, your knickers get knotted over every new kind of ad or freebie. It’s really quite simple; it’s common sense. Your credibility is your only asset; if you sell or or screw it up, you don’t get it back.

On other fronts:

We can debate until the elephants and donkeys come home about disclosing your own political prespective and bias. That’s up to you. ‘

You need to follow the law — whether you like the law or not — regarding copyright and trademark and if you don’t, that’s your risk.

You can set your own rules about answering and quoting email and tolerating commenters, anonymous or otherwise.

There, I just saved myself a committee meeting.

14 responses to “Blog ethics”

  1. Michael Avatar

    What about a privacy policy? Are commenters’ e-mails being harvested and sold? IP addresses tracked?

  2. Vinny Avatar

    You’re a very very smart man. I’ve been wondering how you would chime in on this little committee thing.
    I would add only one item to your list – if a blogger wants his audience to know he adheres to a code of ethics (or privacy party) – he should say so and post his own code of ethics on his site.
    Otherwise – the audience should be at their most skeptical. A blogger needs to earn the trust of his readers. Build a relationship. A code of ethics/privacy policy might help to accelerate that, but in the end the actions have to carry the load.
    Everything else you said is right on the money, but each blogger can make up their own mind and the audience can decide if they want to continue along with the relationship (which is what the whole thing really is).
    In a truly distributed system – free market forces will always win out. The best will rise to the top, the rest will settle somewhere in the middle or bottom, or cease to exist at all.

  3. N.Z. Bear Avatar

    I have mixed feelings on this, but I think my bottom line is that if somebody wants to go ahead and do the whole blogger-trade-association-thing (and that is exactly what this would lead to), I’m fine with it, as long as they don’t bother folks that don’t want to join the club.
    More thoughts over at my place (http://www.truthlaidbear.com/archives/2004/11/22/blogger_ethics_would_you_join_the_club.php#001591)
    -NZB

  4. tony Avatar

    i love it when people who dont have blogs and dont write every day want to create rules for those who do.
    some people really do have a hard time wrapping their tiny brains around the idea of freedom of speech.

  5. dave Avatar

    I enjoy my visits here. Thanks.
    Nothing personal about Nick but many of his (darn popular) sites are all about catty gossip (of course Gizmodo isn’t); they’re where white collar surfers go when they feel marginalized to waste corporate dollars and wallow in sarcasm. I think it’s ironic he would have the nerve to bring up a topic like blog ethics. His bloggers slam quite a few popular figures in good fun but they do get slammed.
    It’s my domain; I pay the bandwidth, I say what I want, I take the consequences. No need for an ethics board.

  6. Michael Avatar

    Dave – that’s like saying that the NYTimes owns the paper and ink it uses, so it doesn’t need an ethics board either. Actions and decisions in blogging indeed have ethical import. Why do so many here feel there are no stakeholders in the blogosphere other than the bloggers themselves?

  7. Elisa C. Avatar

    Yes!
    Between your recent comments on the MNF/Desperate Housewives ridiculousness and THIS ridiculousness, you are becoming my new hero. I may not agree with everything you post, but when I do…you nail it right on the head.
    Here are the 2 cents I posted on this topic yesterday:
    http://homepage.mac.com/elisa_camahort/iblog/C1894745042/E482307835/index.html

  8. Dave Avatar

    Michael, I fear churning the blogger/journalism issue but I don’t see the analogy. I don’t see personal blogs without editors and some form of substantiation for claims to be anything like a newspaper. Maybe this calls for categorization; some blogs are like Journalism and maybe an ethics overview is necessary, but not for the personal sites.

  9. hugh macleod Avatar

    From a personal blog standpoint, a code-of-ethics is not necessary.
    Still, I think what got Nick and Jason thinking is- well, they have advertising clients to keep happy.
    When an advertiser asks them to lie, cheat or steal (and they always do, somehow), Nick and Jason can point to their little seal-of-approval logo and go “no, sorry, can’t, we have the holy seal etc.”

  10. Michael Avatar

    I don’t want to conflate blogging with journalism either. My point is that by virtue of creating an environment for communication (comment sections, etc), certain ethical considerations arise. My primary concern is protecting the personal information (some call it “privacy”) of people who engage in these communications.

  11. jim Avatar

    has it occured to anyone that this whole offer was most certainly nick denton just trying to get jason calacanis to make a fool of himself in front of a very wide audience? that is, calacanis has antagonized nearly everyone of any stature in the community- making him the president of some ridiculous committee would be a sure-fire way to ruin him, and exact painful revenge for his recent comments about jalopnik.

  12. sbw Avatar

    We don’t have an ethics code for our newspaper. We don’t want one. We don’t need one. I tell new employees to follow H.L. Mencken’s advice. He believed if there was one word in the English language that guided his decision-making, that word is “Honor”.
    Do the honorable thing and you’ll do fine.

  13. Michael Avatar

    You need to follow the law — whether you like the law or not — regarding copyright and trademark and if you don’t, that’s your risk.
    How about adopting a Creative Commons licesne rather than the “It’s Mine, All Mine” joke of a copyright notice you have on the site?

  14. richard Avatar

    Your post has earned you the coveted badge for your site….
    http://foo.ca/wp/ethical.png