Questioning power

Questioning power

: Howard Stern said this morning that the only reason his call to Michael Powell yesterday (transcript below) is making such big news today is that journalists no longer ask tough questions.

He’s all too right.

TV especially thinks toughness (and balance) come from getting people from two sides on the air to yell at each other.

Last night, I was on CNBC’s Capitol Report again with right-wingnut Bob Kohn — Ana Marie Cox and I were expecting smart and reasonable blogger John Hinderocker instead. This time, instead of getting into a fussfest with Kohn, I decided to just make fun of him. He started going at it with the host, Gloria Borger. I shouted: What, did I walk into Crossfire here? I said that he, like John Kerry, was humorless. At the end, I begged him to say just one bad thing about George Bush, just for the balance and entertainment. I took my cue from Jon Stewart: Make a joke of the fools.

When Powell went on Ronn Owens’ show on KGO, a condition was that he would not take phone calls. Get that: A government bureacrat who works for us, the people, refuses to talk to the people. What isolation! What arrogance! What crap!

Ronn, to his credit, took Stern’s call anyway. And Stern got in the questions he could, before he was cut short. There was no yelling, no shouting, no sputtering.

A citizen with a grievance finally got to question someone in power.

These days, that’s news.

The problem with a future of citizens’ media, distributed media is that it will get harder and harder for us, the people, to question power. We the people don’t have the access (which makes me regret that I didn’t attend Always On just so I could ask Powell questions of my own about his First Amendment hypocrisy or that two years ago at Foursquare, when I did ask Powell a question about copyright and Larry Lessig I should have asked about Stern). The journalists are supposed to do it for us and they have the access but they get scared of pissing off power. They wimp.

The problem media today isn’t that it’s biased. Or that it’s unbiased. The problem is that media stopped thinking like a human being and asking the questions human beings would ask.

The other day, I saw a WNBC morning show “report” on yoga for little kiddies and their too-rich, too-indulgent, too-stupid parents who’ll pay $400 to have their infants stretch to relieve their terrible tensions (like what, not getting candy when they want it from nanny?). I wanted to shout at the TV. But more than that, I wanted the “reporter” to say to these people: Are you nuts? Do you really think this is worth 4 cents? Do you think this makes a bit of difference to a kid? Don’t you feel like fools? But, no, of course the “reporter” just gives us the yoga nuts’ PR spin and leaves it at that. No confrontation. We do that on Crossfire. That’s what TV says.

Jay Rosen complains, properly, about TV reporters going to spin alley at political events. The problem is, TV is spin alley.

This isn’t a matter of left or right, of bias or objectivity. It’s a matter of common sense: When reporters lose their common sense, they lose their humanity and their credibility and their usefulness.

They need to remind themselves that they are asking questions on behalf of the rest of us who don’t have the chance to. Howard got to ask a few questions of power yesterday. He should not have had to. Reporters should have beaten him to it.

14 responses to “Questioning power”

  1. Mike NYC Avatar

    You got to hang with Ana, didn’t you? You lucky dawg…

  2. Josh Hallett Avatar

    I saw you con CG last night. It was great when you asked Kohn for one negative thing. It’s almost like his mind stalled out:
    “Wow I can’t think of one negative thing, those aren’t on the talking points I was given, I am unable to think on my own.”

  3. Glenn Fleishman Avatar

    Yoga for babies: I wouldn’t pay $400 a session for it, but anything that encourages early exercise, flexibility, and self-discipline (not enforced external discipline) for youngsters seems like a great thing to me. The reporter did a disservice if yoga was represented as a tension reliever. Instead, like many forms of bodywork, it can be a lifelong study in how to use one’s physical self as a focused tool–whether to work out issues of the mind or body.
    So, please, ridicule the $400. Ridicule the tension relief. But there’s good clinical evidence that yoga, tai chi, and (even) western exercise rituals can produce happier, healthier people at any age.
    I’ve been doing PIlates for two years, and it’s a truly strange regimen, but it’s improved my back and posture, and I’m definitely better overall than before I started.

  4. fat kid Avatar

    Now *this* is a damn good post. I’d also draw parallels to what’s going on in the stock market in general – I’ve got some friends on the equity analysis side of things in NYC and they are simply afraid of asking management tough questions out of fear of being left “out of the loop”. What’s also very scary in that industry is how much is done verbally, over the phone, or any way BUT email. No trace left behind, and no responsibility.

  5. david Avatar

    You went on a show with Wonkette as a fellow guest and you expected a “smart and reasonable” discussion….good god (as you would say) “ARE YOU NUTS!”

  6. Frank Barnako Avatar
    Frank Barnako

    ” journalists no longer ask tough questions. ”
    This is precsely what Jon Stewart was talking about. i.e.:
    CNN: “Bay Buchanan what do you think?”
    BB: “They are wrong, wrong wrong.”
    CNN: “Susan Estrich, what do you think”
    SE: “They are wrong, wrong wrong.”
    CNN: “We’ll have to leave it there. NBears have been registered to vote in Omaha. We’ll be back with that story, in a minute.”

  7. Anil Avatar

    Yeah, I have to second the “bash spendy parents, not Yoga” idea. My father taught me a lot of the basics of yoga as a kid and there’s a lot that’s served me well my whole life. Of course, he wasn’t paying himself $400 an hour to spend time with me.

  8. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Anil: Revenue opportunity! I see a chain: Yogad!

  9. Dann Avatar

    Hi Jeff,
    “When Powell went on Ronn Owens’ show on KGO, a condition was that he would not take phone calls. Get that: A government bureacrat who works for us, the people, refuses to talk to the people. What isolation! What arrogance! What crap!”
    Sorry, but the BS meter just went off.
    I listened to the audio link. Ronn Owens made a big deal about the fact that Michael Powell wouldn’t take calls, and Mr. Powell acted surprised. He immediately indicated that he was willing to take calls saying [paraphrased] that as a public servant he is always willing to listen and respond to the concerns of citizens.
    It seemed like the ‘no calls’ rule was more of a flunky’s invention than something Mr. Powell dreamed up.
    As for the rest of the broadcast, I think Mr. Powell came off as informed and quite reasonable.
    I’ve listened to and watched Howard’s show. It isn’t exactly my speed.
    At the same time, I think Mr. Powell has Howard’s position down pat; Howard doesn’t think there should be any limits as to what he says on the airwaves. Howard doesn’t see the difference between Oprah discussing ‘tossed salads’ as a part of a show about explaining kid-speak to parents and his own program that is designed to entertain the Beavis and Butthead crowd.
    I’m not a huge fan of the FCC, but IMO, they do a reasonable job at enforcing the laws that Congress has passed without going overboard.
    Regards,

  10. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Dann: Ronn Owens said this morning that the rule going in was no calls but he always waits until the show is underway and then bugs the guest and shames them into taking calls. Ronn is very clever that way; he has been doing this a long time and I’ve watched him in the studio so I buy it.

  11. Steve Rhodes Avatar

    I wouldn’t be surprised it Powell’s flaks made no phone calls a condition.
    When I covered the Cable TV trade show in 2003 right before the FCC voted on the new media ownership rules, people bragged Powell was speaking there at such an important time. But then the industry guy who interviewed him didn’t ask about the vote. And although Powell was still there to lunch with industry people, he didn’t attend the press conference after the session.

  12. Dexter Westbrook Avatar
    Dexter Westbrook

    Mr. Jarvis, your post is the most nonsensical I’ve seen on your blog.
    Oh, Howard Stern asking the tough questions, eh? The questions the media won’t ask?
    Let’s have a look at Howard’s questions, which represent about 2 percent of his anti-FCC rant.
    Q: How did you get your job? Do you deny your father got you your job?
    Powell has been on the FCC for eight years. Nothin’ like questions about those poppin’ fresh issues, eh? And, uh, Howard, how long have you been divorced?
    Q: When will you allow this to go to court and stop practicing your form of racketeering that you do by making stations pay up or you hold up their license renewal?
    Man, it’s evil for a federal regulatory agency to demand payment of fines before the company owing the fines can get a license. We can’t impede the progress of a company like Viacom in its quest to gobble up every broadcaster in sight, now, can we?Maybe we should let criminals blow off paying their fines, too.
    Q: Why don’t you fine Oprah Winfrey, then?
    Howard Stern is so pathetic. BAWAHHHHH! You’ll fine me but you won’t fine Oprah Winfrey!
    First of all, Powell has been asked these questions, ad nauseum, long ago, when it was actually timely to do so. Just because you, Mr. Jarvis, haven’t paid attention to the answers, or don’t agree with them, you assume the media is not “asking the tough questions.” That makes no sense whatsoever.
    When Stern goes onto satellite, he won’t have the FCC as a foil any more, no more built-in excuses about how his speech is being suppressed. He’ll regret not having the FCC and Powell to kick around any more.

  13. Dann Avatar

    Jeff-
    I understand that. However, my take after listening to the full audio of that broadcast hours is that he was unaware of the ‘no calls’ limitation and was more than happy to take them. No ‘shaming’ was required.
    Had Mr. Powell refused to accept calls, then I think your response would have been warranted. But since he embraced the opportunity to take calls, I think the implication of your response creates an inaccurate impression regarding Mr. Powell.
    Regards,

  14. tony Avatar

    dexturrrr,
    yeah howard will be real bummed out to have his $100 mil contract and no chance to get unfairly fined by powell/bushco.
    what exactly will he “regret” again?