Reinventing the convention

Reinventing the convention

: The real story of this convention should be the death and reinvention of political conventions. I have some suggestions — no, I have a damned manifesto — for reinventing conventions from the bottom up.

It’s no news that no news will come from the Democratic National Convention this week — nevertheless, we apparently need 15,000 journalists and now a gaggle of bloggers to tell us nothing. This is why I decided not to go to the convention. (More on that in a minute.) It’s the unevent. It should not exist.

But then I thought about ways to rebuild the convention, to make them relevant and useful — and democratic — again:

1. Prove that you are the party that listens. Hold sessions — not panels, not speeches, not lectures, not platform meetings, but sessions on the BloggerCon model — with experts and citizens (and politicians listening and not speaking unless spoken to) brought together to have conversations about the issues and solutions that really matter to all of us: health care, education, taxes, defense, terrorism, the economy…

Of course, it won’t be a controlled message. That’s just the point. It’s about listening. It’s about having the conversation. If markets are conversations and news is a conversation then politics and government certainly should be a conversation. Democracy is a conversation. Thus Cluetrain meets McLuhan: The medium is the message and the message is, “We are the party that listens.”

2. Open the convention to the citizens. Just as the Democrats have opened the media tent to include not just every journalist alive but now also bloggers, so should they open the gates to citizens. By inviting nonpols and unconnected people to those sessions on issues, they would bring the conventions back to the people — which is precisely who the conventions are supposed to be about. These are supposed to be the one time in four years when the citizens have a voice in politics. But, of course, only pols and the connected can attend. And so the citizens resent the people behind the curtain. The only way to solve that is to invite the people behind the curtain, too.

3. Decentralize the convention. Take those sessions and webcast them and open up a backchannel to involve anyone and everyone who gives a damn anywhere in the country. Want to talk to every state? Then listen to every state.

4. Harness citizens. If you learned anything from Howard Dean, it should be that the people will move mountains for them if you involve them in the process. So all during convention week, hold MeetUps in Boston and across the country and call that the real convention of the real party.

Simple suggestions, really. You can still have your speeches. You can still fight over nominations in the odd chance it comes to that. But you can also listen to citizens, involve citizens, include the nation.

: UPDATE: Quoth Doc Searls:

Power from the people, people. Not the other way around. Finally.

Maybe.

: UPDATE: David Weinberger expects these to be the last old-style conventions:

Will we ever do this again? Is 2004 the last year we’re going to have national conventions like these?…

All this is a lot to ask of a city, and it’s a lot to do to a city. In four years, with ratings down, the politics purely ceremonial, and the risk of putting an entire political party in one square block ever higher, will the Democrats and Republicans decide that it’s time to “think outside” this particular box? Let the delegates vote by absentee ballot and then send the candidates to a series of celebratory parties around the country so “all Americans can share the excitement” — and also distribute the risk and costs.

Are these the last conventions we’re going to hold? Or, once I experience one, am I going to see their value?

15 responses to “Reinventing the convention”

  1. labor Avatar

    Democracy isn’t a conversation, it’s an argument. If you want to make democracy into a “conversation”, you are destroying democracy.

  2. Greg Avatar

    I think the current party leadership would find it impossible to give up control of their talking points. I’d like to see your suggestions taken seriously… but by this bunch?
    I don’t think so.

  3. Donut Avatar

    Jeff,
    Dean lost. So did McCain. And Perot. For some reason, these media-darling populist citizen harnassers are not able to covert their power to the one currency that really matters – people voting. Using their methods as examples to the very people who crushed them may not lead to persuasion.
    The two current parties (Govt owns your money vs. Govt owns your relationships) are not successful with the people because they don’t have to be, and they don’t want to be. They don’t have to be because they have created an environment in electoral politics where it is almost illegal to challenge the status quo. They don’t want to be because the politicians are in it for their own personal gain, have the cushiest jobs in the world, and can almost never be held accountable.
    I think that people have a close connection to powerful entities in American life that they might have had to government in the past: corporations. The big publically traded corporations consists of people like us, who are accountable, and work really hard to give us what we want – good things that are valuable. I believe that Coca Cola and Microsoft have done more for me in the last year (Diet Coke with Lime, Microsoft Reporting Services 2000) than the government has done for me since they cosigned my college loans. The best part – I pay them voluntarily, not through taxes that are collected with a gun to my head. And if Coke or Microsoft disapoint me? Pepsi and Apple. And if they really screw up, the market punishes them, to the point of making them disappear. Try to get some accounting work from Arthur Anderson.
    So, why should we give a crap for this large group of people, granted with guns, that don’t work for our interests, don’t listen to us, and are mostly beyond our powers?
    Wow, that was a scary rant. I do LOVE the diet coke with Lime, though.

  4. lobotomy Avatar
    lobotomy

    “Harnass [sic] citizens”?
    Citizens of the world unite, and cast off your harnesses! (Unless you like that sort of thing.) ;)

  5. kim Avatar

    The key word in your post is “listen.” There’s worlds of wisdom there.
    From what I’ve seen the biggest problem with the Bush administration is that they would prefer not to listen.
    In the long run, this is why we’ll look at the Bush administration as a failure: he belived that it was a sign of strength to ignore half of the country.
    On one hand, Kerry hasn’t proven himself here either. On the other, who could do worse?

  6. Bill Koslosky Avatar

    Jeff:
    I agree with your idea about using expert panels to discuss various topics. For example, I think there should a televised week-long debate on embryonic stem cell research and therapies, but I feel the panel members should consist of ethicists, scientists, religious leaders and patients.
    We’ve just seen a remarkable accomplishment from a survivor of a germ cell tumor, Lance Armstrong. It wasn’t that long ago when this meant a death sentence as in the case of Brian Piccolo (Brian’s Song).
    I highly recommend reading the reports published by the President’s Council on Bioethics . In anticipation of Ron Reagan, Jr.’s speech, I’m posting items on my blog to encourage a deeper analysis of this topic at
    Even the Catholic Church’s and Kerry’s contention that life begins at conception becomes difficult to support if you begin to look at the arguments of various ethicists.
    Hoping for a safe convention. -BK

  7. N.Z. Bear Avatar

    Sorry Jeff, you forgot to put it in PDF format, so clearly it doesn’t qualify as a ‘manifesto’… ;-)
    -NZB

  8. lw Avatar

    You’ve confused political convetions with the New England town meeting. Political conventions are not “suppose to be about” bringing politics to the people. Conventions are specifically for party regulars, most of whom are elected locally, to cast their nominating vote for a candidate.

  9. syn Avatar

    After witnessing for over two decades that the rising tide of Islamic Fascism was a growing threat and needed to be seriously addressed, I finally found a President who listened to me. A leader who saw the same thing I had seen over the past two decades, that Islamic Fascism could not be resolved through the failed polices of law enforcement, diplomacy and containment.
    That said, I will be interested to witness how the Democratic Party, during the DNC, whitewashes three years of hateful, lying rhetoric in one short week.
    I would also like to witness the Democratic Party, during the DNC, acknowledge that Joesph Wilson lied and insist he appologize for having perpetuated distortions, lies and slander towards President Bush.
    I was once an Independent, the Democratic Party has shown to me I can no longer afford the luxury of being an Independent.

  10. trump Avatar

    By the way Jeff, you should really answer this already (it’s from another thread, but it spiraled off on tangents, so here it is):
    Jeff, answer the question when you get a chance: Why are you – as a hawk on terror- voting for Kerry, given his dreadful selections of advisors in Berger and Wilson (who would most likely have held positions in Kerry’s govt in the event of election if they hadn’t been exposed)
    Jeff, please tell us why you feel Kerry would do a better job on Terror?
    I’m gonna post this in every thread until you answer…

  11. Andy Freeman Avatar
    Andy Freeman

    > From what I’ve seen the biggest problem with the Bush administration is that they would prefer not to listen.
    Why this fetish for listening to people who still haven’t figured out that they’re wrong?
    They didn’t laugh at Einstein or Newton – they laughed at Bozo the Clown.

  12. Mike G Avatar

    The conventions HAVE evolved into something else. They’re cover for all the fundraising that goes on with the concentratuon of bigwigs in one place. Why would they want to do anything that might spook that?

  13. Leland Avatar

    The convention is just one big party. The media attends the Oscars every year, not to report on the Oscars, with the results apparent on TV, but to attend the after parties. Sure, some Mag will report on the goings on at the after parties, as will some of the 15,000 journalist report on the parties in Boston. Some Dem faithful will tirelessly work on a platform document that few will read and all will disregard.
    I think Weinberger says it best about having the voters vote absentee and having celebratory parties around the nation. That way, the party, which is first to reinvent their convention, can have 15,000 journalist following them around from state to state.

  14. Shannon Love Avatar
    Shannon Love

    The democrats are not going to innovate because they are now the conservative faction in American politics.
    Their organizational paradigms are deeply rooted in their mid-20th century successes. They believe the best solution to virtually every problem is a strongly centralized, deeply hierarchal government organization. They violently reject any decentralized solution.
    They are now fighting not to implement new daring proposals for the 21st century but to preserve the archaic solutions of the 20th. If they cannot think in a decentralized manner on health care, education or foreign policy they are unlikely to think in a decentralized manner when it comes to running their own party.

  15. Kirk Parker Avatar
    Kirk Parker

    politicians listening and not speaking unless spoken to

    Whoa! What alternative reality have you tapped in to??? (Don’t get me wrong, this would be nice, but…)