The Daily Stern

The Daily Stern

: LET’S CALL IT WHAT IT IS: CENSORSHIP: National Nanny Michael Powell addresses cable execs and one of them — at last — talks back.

Oxygen Media Inc. CEO and founder Geraldine Laybourne criticized the FCC’s enforcement effort during the National Cable & Telecommunications Assn.’s (NCTA) annual trade show.

“I don’t think we should use the word indecency; we should call it what it is: censorship,” Laybourne said Tuesday during one of the show’s panel discussions….

“I don’t agree with that,” Powell told reporters after his dialogue. “For 70 years, the country has had limits on broadcast television. To me censorship is prior restraint, and I don’t think anybody has been involved in that limitation on content.”

Well that’s a lie. Read the news, Chairman Powell: The evidence of the chill you have put on media is everywhere.

: WILL YOU FINE THE HERO, POWELL? The same story continues with something that should put Powell on the hot seat: The FCC has now ruled that a single utterance of the F word is now officially profanity and should be fined. So will they fine the family of Iraq War hero Pat Tillman?

The remarks came as News Corp. executives were worrying about the possible fallout from a memorial service for Pat Tillman, where his brother reportedly used a version of the word “f—” twice. The service for Tillman, the former Arizona Cardinals safety who was killed while serving as an Army Ranger in Afghanistan, was carried on some News Corp. cable channels and was broadcast on at least one News Corp. station, according to the executives.

“Who would have thought you needed a seven-second delay at a memorial service,” one News Corp. executive lamented. “We’re worried about it.”

Powell declined to say whether the commission would investigate the broadcast of the memorial service.

“We respond to complaints,” he said. “This isn’t some discretionary activity being administered by the agency because it feels like it. It’s a response to the American public.”

When asked directly about the Tillman memorial service, Powell declined to say whether the broadcast was considered indecent or not.

“I will never sit here and do hypotheticals about whether something is liable or not,” he said. “Our process has never been different. If we receive complaints about a broadcast, that will be investigated and a decision will be made, I think, responsibly.”

Well, then, someone should complain and then the FCC will be forced to fine a war hero’s family.

That, you see, is the position this idiotic move to censorship has put us in.

Hit Bono, hit the hero.

: NO FAINT PRAISE: On his show this morning, Stern thanked his audience for sending in now 1,900 complaints about Oprah to the FCC. He also said that even though he was glad the New York Times came out on his side of the fight for the First Amendment this week — as well it should — he is sick of seeing that support for him in media always comes with a grudging, ‘well, we have to defend even Howard Stern.’

So let me repeat here what I said in my story in The Nation (just to drive you anti-Sternies nutsier):

But it’s not just about sex and the religious right. It’s also about political correctness and the left. We live in an age of offense. The cardinal sin today is to offend; the clearest badge of victimhood is to be offended. Sadly, I hear some refuse to defend Stern and his speech because “he offends.” Well, the First Amendment is often defended on the backs of the offensive: Larry Flynt or the KKK. But I won’t lump Stern in with them. For, judged in the whole, Stern is not offensive.

Let me tell you why I am such a Howard Stern fan. Until I reviewed his show for TV Guide, I had heard the same snippets, quotes and characterizations you had. I thought he was best taken in small doses. But after listening to him for a few weeks, I discovered that, to the contrary, he is best taken in large doses. For then you discover that Stern is charming, likable, decent, funny, a talented entertainer, a great interviewer, and–more than anything–honest.

Stern is an antidote to all the overpackaged, smiley, phony, condescending pap of personality in American media and entertainment. In an age of predictable news (shouldn’t news be just the opposite?) and political correctness and numbing national rhetoric, Stern cuts through the crap and says what he thinks–and what many of us think. And that is incredibly refreshing. No, it’s liberating.

Howard also quoted Rudy Guliani asking publicly where Howard’s political friends are now. They should be there fighting for the First Amendment next to him. Media certainly should be.

: Here’s a Christian Science Monitor puff piece on Powell.

10 responses to “The Daily Stern”

  1. Mumblix Grumph Avatar
    Mumblix Grumph

    The New York Times sided with a rabid Bush-hater? Please note the absence of gasps at that news flash.

  2. anne.elk Avatar
    anne.elk

    A key factor in its analysis, duly noted in its “Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture,” was that the segment contained “repeated flatulence sound effects.

    boohbah the new PBS kids’ show with lots of flatulence noises.

  3. anne.elk Avatar
    anne.elk

    I am curious why you don’t add Howard Stern’s website to your blogroll.
    An interesting aspect of this mess is that Stern’s website has improved 10,000%. That’s right, 10,000% as measured by a team of Swedish economists.

  4. Mike Avatar

    Why does Stern get upset when people call his show offensive or say yes we even have to defend Howard Stern? Why is it OK for Stern to rant about others, but now, even when people defend him, Stern has to go out of his way to bitch about them!
    Give us a break, can’t you guys see how he is not a champion of free speech and only cares about himself! He has made millions from his sextalk and crude humor, so who cares what others say about him. All he does is whine lately. You should rename your posts to the Daily Stern Whine.
    Stern is not the guy to be rallying around for this cause. There are other, more worthy, incidents and people. Fining individuals for utterances spoken over live airwaves is ridiculous. I agree, that’s something that should be stopped, but Stern is not going to fight for anyone else but himself.

  5. KMK Avatar

    71 year old Jeanie just called in to tell Howard not only is he in the observer but that he’s on the cover of The Nation. “wonderful article written by Jeff Jarvis” said Jeanie. She’s been listening to him since the morning drive show on NBC and supports him. Was it a real caller, no idea, but she said your name on air.

  6. tony Avatar

    Mike,
    The reason Stern probably gets upset is that journalists dont know how to write about his show without spending a majority of the article saying that the show is “offensive” and “racist” and “obnoxious” etc before they explain why the show deserves the same protection that any show deserves.
    On the show today they discussed how if the same writers described Buggs Bunny cartoons, they would say “despite being chock-full of violence against animals…”
    The majority of the Howard Stern show is not about fart jokes or satire about racism. The guy has been on the air close to 30 years, 4-5 hours a day. The more accurate way to describe him is something along the lines of “everyone gets made fun of on the Howard Stern show: from democrats to republicans, to pretty people to stutterers, from Howard and his gang, to his mother and father.”
    To cherry-pick the jokes and try to protray it as something that Stern does 90% of the show is just plain wrong and lazy journalism.

  7. pb Avatar

    I’m so sick of every commentator prefacing their comments with “I’m no Stern fan, but…”.

  8. Greg Piper Avatar

    Jarvis, don’t pretend like the FCC is going to fine a war hero’s family. They would fine the broadcaster, and given that this was a memorial service, not an awards show, they’d be hard pressed to blame News Corp. for not instituting a delay. The current policy is far too broad, I agree, but be honest instead of resorting to cheap rhetorical flourishes like “will they fine the war hero’s family?” I love your blog and link it often, but sometimes you let your emotions get the better of you.

  9. Ernest Miller Avatar

    The FCC can’t fine the family of Tillman, yet. They aren’t allowed to under the current law, but would under the proposed law that is being held up in the Senate right now (not because it obviously violates the First Amendment, but because it attacks the FCC’s media consolidation acts). However, under the new law, the FCC could fine Tillman’s brother, since he probably knew that what he was saying would be broadcast (which is the standard). Would they? Unlikely, but why would we want them to even have the option? What if Tillman’s brother said “F*CK Bush for getting my brother killed”? I don’t trust the government not to punish speech it doesn’t like.