Death be not blogged

Death be not blogged
: John Perry Barlow wrote two remarkable posts about the apparent suicide of his friend, Spalding Gray, and the little funeral he had for him on his blog. But he just wrote something even more notable about the hecklers at that funeral who came to his comments. Barlow explains his own posts and, in the process, explains much of the reason why people write these weblogs:

Among the beliefs that [Spalding Gray] and I shared was a conviction that making public the intimately personal is a revolutionary act in an atomized society where many feel compelled to play so close to the chest that they can’t read their own cards. Being emotionally naked before strangers extends to them a permission for self-revelation they badly need if they are to loosen the shackles of their own quiet desperations. It is a blow against the pursuit of loneliness.

Had I been the one who leapt and were Spalding still as he was before his breakdown, he would be incorporating my disappearance into a monologue at this very moment.

This is about living — and dying — in public.

In fact, Anthony Cox just sent me a link to a post he wrote about people who are dying and blogging about it. I haven’t had the courage to read them yet. Too much death lately.

Barlow goes on to talk about death:

But death has become wild and obscene in this country. Its power threatens our national religion of control. To die in America is to fail. It is an act of weakness….

Merely to speak of death in plain terms is considered by many to be disrespectful and offensive….

Having gotten that off his chest, bluntly and openly, Barlow then scolds the commenters who would scold him for not being open themselves:

I think it odd that someone can write of my disrespect while showing me so little.

And I find it marvelously ironic that I am accused of name-dropping by someone who is unwilling to drop even his own.

(On that last point, I beg those of you who post to this blog to please do so without hiding behind false identities. I want to build a kind of community here. Community without personal responsibility ceases to exist. And responsibility requires identity and the courage to own one’s opinions.)

8 responses to “Death be not blogged”

  1. Rob Avatar

    Lets not forget those who are surviving death, and blogging about it.

  2. EB Avatar

    It’s Gray. Not Grey.

  3. Easycure Avatar

    I spell grey G-R-E-Y as well. It is just as correct……

  4. stoddart Avatar

    I think the guy should be allowed to spell his own last name the way he wants. In other words, with an “a”.

  5. scott orrell Avatar
    scott orrell

    No one has commented on your no-anonymity request yet, so let me be the first. I think that it’s fabulous. I’ve been under a different title (mainly because I thought it was soooo smart), and I wish more people would think like you do. But be careful what you wish for. You may end up with a community of fools. We don’t pick our neighbors, only the neighborhood.

  6. vachon Avatar

    I’m a bit perplexed about your request for “real” identities. This is my 11th year on the internet. I have been vachon for all of that time, whether on mIRC or MaxSpeak.
    When I first logged on to the internet (using an Apple Performa, 2400 modem and 600k hard drive) the bulletin board at my ISP that connected to mIRC wanted a name that was not more than 7 characters. I was watching Forever Knight on TV at the time and took the first name I heard: that of the vampire vachon. Lol! Been vachon ever since, and I really, really cherish it.
    Does it matter if I spell myself as John Doe or Victor Hugo, or Jayne Mansfield? It’s still the same person typing these letters.

  7. Beth Avatar

    The whole situation with Mr. Gray made me sad from the first time I read about it in disbelief. When I stumbled upon his monologue on HBO so many years ago I sat mesmorized at the talent, but more so at the openness. It was rare and refreshing.
    In blogs as well I’m drawn to those who are more bold and open.
    In this new era of news as communication, you have to get closer to people to communicate with them, and we can’t get closer unless we’re all willing to take the risk of openness. It’s hard to be anonymous and open.

  8. triticale Avatar

    I agree with vachon. Nicknonymity is not anonymity. I have an identity attached to the name, and a reputation to go with it. Yes I could start all over if I make an ass of myself, but that would be just as true if I were blogging as John Doe or Victor Hugo, or Jayne Mansfield, or using a less obvious pseudonym such as Elihu Kenwood or Ralph Eubanks.