Blogger of the Year… But first… Lunch at Harry & Tina’s

Blogger of the Year… But first… Lunch at Harry & Tina’s
: So I had lunch at Harry Evans’ and Tina Brown’s home today… with about a hundred others.

I was at the kiddie table — that is, the bloggers’ table. But I was glad to be there. As someone at that table said, who wouldn’t walk through glass for lunch at Harry & Tina’s?

We were there for the presentation of The Week magazine‘s first annual Opinion Awards — including, significantly, an award for Blogger of the Year. More on that in a moment. But first — priorities! — we’re talking about lunch at Harry & Tina’s!

: Yes, it’s like a matinee of Tony & Tina’s. It’s a performance and you’re trying to figure out who acting and who’s not.

We come to the front door out of a day colder than a Timesman’s heart and we’re given little envelopes with our table assignments — 11, bad sign — and directed to a ground-floor door with the admonition that the furniture has all been moved (so we won’t be getting the real experience). It’s still obviously a lovely home with pictures everywhere — an original Sorel here, a fine old news print there — and books filling remaining space (with reporters desperately scanning the spines, hunting the elusive color).

In a small parlor, we become more and more crammed. Abe Rosenthal totters about. Mario Cuomo holds court. (I got in his way in the hall and said, “Excuse me, governor.” Felt odd to say, as if I’d left Tony & Tina’s and entered My Fair Lady.) Jim Hoge, the ageless Dick Clark of publishing (editor of Foreign Affairs and a former boss of mine at the Daily News) is over there. Edward Epstein, Vartan Gregorian, and other luminaries abound. The jury for the print awards included these folks plus others: Susan Cheever, Robert Caro, Henry Louis Gates Jr., Lani Guinier, Edward Rollins, Wendy Wasserstein, Steven Ratner, Walter Isaacson, Alex Jones, Lauren Hutton (Lauren Hutton?!?). And there were reporters, including Matthew Rose of the WSJ and Greg Lindsay of WWD and Keith Kelly of the NY Post. I don’t know nearly as many of the luminaries as I should because I’m a hermit, aka a blogger.

: Time for the awards. I’ll save the best (the blogger) for last.

The Week Editor Bill Falk (a very nice guy whose weekly columnettes you should read) introduces Harry, who does the honors.

: They give a Local Columnist of the Year award to Tommy Tomlinson of the Charlotte Observer, a mountainous guy (the other winners are all minimen) who gives a charming thank you: He loves his local gig but he sometimes wonders whether anybody else notices. He dreams that John Updike — he’s not sure why it’s Updike — finds himself in the Charlotte airport between flights and picks up a paper and reads his column and says, “Not bad.” This, he says, is better.

: They give an award for Single-Issue Advocate of the Year. Finalists: Michele Malkin, Joel Mowbray, William Safire, Andrew Sullivan.

And the winner is… Paul Krugman.

Harry says that in Britain they have a parliamentary opposition but here we don’t need that; we have Krugman.

Krugman says it’d be nice if we actually had a parliamentary opposition. And he adds: “I didn’t think I was an advocate. I think I’m fair and balanced.”

: Now Columnist of the Year. Finalists: David Brooks of the Times, Steve Chapman of the Chicago Tribune, William Kristol of the Weekly Standard.

And the winner is… Thomas Friedman.

A better award is rarely given.

Friedman doesn’t say much. He mentions starting a synagogue (“like all good Jews”) with Bill Safire. News to me (more on this here). He tells about recently asking the editor of Ha’aretz why they run his column. “You’re the only optimist we have,” the editor replies.

: Now Blogger of the Year. Glenn Reynolds, Daniel Radosh, and I picked this one, separately from the luminary-judges above.

What mattered most to us — if I can speak for my colleagues — is that a blogger was included. That meant that all bloggers were included.

The finalists:

: Mickey Kaus, “a pioneer blogger who helped set the tone for the medium: sly, wry, knowing, and head of the news.”

: Gawker, “a snarky New York-centric blog that snipes at big shots in media, politics, and showbiz — has reinvigorated the stale art of gossip.”

: Volokh, “a libertarian collective that excels at analyzing legal, political, and academic trends.”

: Winds of Change, “always thoughtful, thorough, and full of links to things you’d probably never see on your own.”

: And the winner for Blogger of the year is… Joshua Micah Marshall, author of TalkingPointsMemo.

I liked Josh and all the finalists and plenty more. What swayed me on Josh is that he not only pundits but he reports. In fact, he came to this do on his way to his blogosphere-supported reporting trip to New Hampshire.

Josh accepted the award and said, “I’d like to thank you not so much for choosing me but for choosing bloggers.”

Amen, blogging brother.

I’ll reprint the writeup on Josh below, under the “more” link.

: So then we ate: a nice something of mushrooms and chicken over damned rich polenta and a nice chocolate thing (Jackie’s going to fire me as a food critic) and cookies with The Week printed on them (who knew that ink tasted so good?). Choire Sicha of Gawker was desperately trying to find something to write about for The Observer. When accused of underblogging, Elizabeth Spiers protested that she’s on vacation (she’s also tracking down big financial stories for the new New York Magazine).

And Tina Brown was gracious if just a wee bit tense and nervous whenever she passed by this gaggle of bloggers, for we’ve all snarked at her expense. Well, you could say, live by the snark, die by the snark. But it was quite cool that she and Harry threw this do and we’re not even mad that they didn’t give us a single thing to snark about.

: Afterwards, I got to meet the one luminary I most wanted to meet: Friedman. Nothing better to say than, in the fine tradition of Stuttering John, “big fan, big fan.” To my utter delight, Friedman knew this very URL and, no surprise, he knows blogs. I then asked the obvious: Are you going to blog? He said he’d been asked whether he wanted to (note that blog/Times watchers) but in his line of work, he somewhat fears the immediacy of it. He’s supposed to think for three days, and sometimes, he said, that’s not enough. Oh, I get that. But still, I’d kill to see just links to what he’s reading: Tom Friedman’s Quick Links.

theweekawards.jpg

From left: Tomlinson, Krugman, Evans, Falk, Friedman, Marshall

Here’s the write-up on Blogger of the Year:

Joshua Micah Marshall, author of TalkingPointsMemo.com, represents the best of the Internet

34 responses to “Blogger of the Year… But first… Lunch at Harry & Tina’s”

  1. HH Avatar

    Note Krugman looking around to make sure the Bush Gestapo isn’t there to lock him up…

  2. EB Avatar

    re: news source for blogs, looks like someone invented it, Lt Smash has this link I just saw it:
    http://www.memeorandum.com/

  3. rivlax Avatar

    The winners have a distinct lefty cast, even Tomlinson fits (er, if that can be said of him) that mold.

  4. Mike G Avatar

    Josh Marshall is a good choice in terms of doing something innovative. I actually read him less and less though because, to steal someone else’s line (Sullivan?), he’s turned into Sidney Blumenthal. Every post starts with the assumption that the Bushies are the most astonishingly incompetent and venal bunglers ever to hit DC. That would be in contrast to the entire history of American politics, a reign of sobriety, farsightedness and utter incorruptibility right until this moment. It’s one thing to be partisan, it’s another to be so predictably and rotely so. (As they said in Casablanca, don’t underestimate American blundering, I was with them when they blundered into Berlin.) The better partisans can be partisan without making me feel like they think I’m just a rube to be spun for hidden gain. That’s why Marshall is now one of the bookmarks I rarely hit.
    Tom Friedman? I don’t know why he’d want to blog either. I don’t know why anyone with a column would want to hang his half-finished thoughts out there for free. But who says he has to do it that way? Why not put up a page that’s for extra thoughts, references, whatever amplifies his column? Not a blog, the director’s cut DVD.

  5. HH Avatar

    Innovative? Yes. Intellectually honest? Are you kidding?

  6. Kim du Toit Avatar

    Fine… but who are Harry and Tina? Or is it a restaurant called “Harry & Tina’s”?

  7. tim Avatar

    Did the selection criteria limit choices to US bloggers? If not, I can’t see how Salam Pax could be overlooked. Despite his ideological, er, confusion, he was massively influential and at the centre of the biggest story of 2003. And he inspired (along with Jeff) many other Iraqi bloggers.
    Marshall is incredibly narrow; he’s merely extended the influence of blogs from one beltway border to another.

  8. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Tim: We discussed Salam as well as Hoder and Zeyad (and I could argue that Hoder had a far greater impact than Salam). Though I don’t know that there was a U.S. rule it ended up that way.

  9. Alexei Avatar

    Great finalists, awful winners. It’s the NYTimes/Pulitzer Committee approach: pay some rudimentary lip service to the actual pioneers and important opinion shapers but then give the actual awards and acclaim to the predictably leftist, politburo-approved writers. And your bootlicking of “Harry and Tina” is embarassing. This is a sad day for bloggers: co-opted, disgraced and ignored all within the same time. And at just the historical moment when old media was wheezing its final stank breaths, why would new media come to their defense with a puff piece like this? As if “Harry and Tina” and their cocktail party friends really matter to anybody except for sad bloggers who wish they were real and true “approved” literati. Sad.

  10. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Ferchrissakes, Alexei, ease up: The people let us come into their house for lunch. What’s to attack? You sound pathetically jealous.

  11. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Rivlax: Yeah, the way the voting was organized (anonymous ballots vs meetings) the leftward bent just happened and I am sure the magazine would have preferred a more balanced outcome. Still, these are people who get attention and that is a criteria and measurement for things such as this. I don’t speak for the magazine — I have no business relationship to them, just helping out because I’m glad they’re doing what they’re doing.

  12. Jackie D Avatar

    I’ll never fire you as a food critic, Jeff, but yes, that was incredibly vague. Still, the bit about Tommy Tomlinson is charming, so I forgive you.

  13. EB Avatar

    Howard Kurtz from the wash post is blogging now, in addition to his collumn:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/columns/kurtzhoward/

  14. Yehudit Avatar

    Winds of Change should have won.
    But I’m glad they made the finals and I hope they get lots more publicity and hits from it.

  15. Greg D Avatar

    TPM?
    The All Democrat Party propaganda, all the time Blog?
    Oh well, at least the finalists (3 of them, I’ve never read Gawker) are worth reading.

  16. Bryan Avatar

    You guys chose Josh “I never met a conspiracy theory I didn’t like” Marshall? I wasn’t even a nominee, but I want a recount.

  17. Buck Smith Avatar
    Buck Smith

    Well, Marshall was creative in using his blog to solicit financing of his reporting, so maybe he deserves some kind of award. Jeff Jarvis make some good points for why he deserves the award.
    Having said that, I have a hard time swallowing his snarky anti-war commentary. I guess I take it as medicine, to show my bipartisan bonafides. I gotta think the awards committee did the same.

  18. Harry Gonzalez Avatar
    Harry Gonzalez

    Am I the only one or is Joshua Micah Marshall really boring and predictable?

  19. ct Avatar

    Marshall is a twit. The only reason he gets mentioned on other blogs is because bloggers are so eager to maintain their left-wing bona fides (or, maybe better put, ‘objective, non-blind-partisan’ bona fides).
    Oh, and, ‘Harry and Tina’… They moved the furniture, but did they at least break out the personal dog collar collection for you?

  20. Mr. Davis Avatar
    Mr. Davis

    Now that we’re getting catty, may I ask, does Krugman drool?

  21. Joe Katzman Avatar

    Thanks very much for making us a finalist in the Blogger of the Year awards!
    We intend to kick it up yet another notch in 2004.

  22. Tom Avatar

    SO DISMAYED IN YOUR FAWNING..like a teenager so impressionable…REALLY!

  23. Mitch H. Avatar

    Marshall was blogger of the year… just not this year. 2002 was a very good year for him. 2003 was something the opposite of good.
    If I were him, I would be deeply embarrassed to be sharing the dais with Paul Krugman. But I fear that the likelihood that he wouldn’t be embarrassed by Krugman is part and parcel of why he’s had such a bad year.
    From that list, I’d definitely have chosen Winds of Change. But Salam, Hoder or Zeyad would have made it ahead of any of those finalists.

  24. Ryan Avatar

    Wait…did you expect someone to take this seriously as some sort of award, or was it supposed to be a satirical post poking fun at easily-impressed, self-important people who rejoice in being made to look like fools? Please forgive my confusion, but satire doesn’t come across well in writing sometimes.
    Paul Krugman, Tom Friedman…and Josh Marshall?
    Josh Marshall as the “Blogger of the Year”? I can picture the decisional process right now.
    1. Sit down at a computer.
    2. Go to Alexa.com.
    3. Crossed off all the non-media controlled or conservative blogs.
    4. Voila, “Blogger of the Year”!
    Congratulations. Your award completely ignores the motivations and anti-establishment feeling that are fueling the Blogger Revolution. You’ve handed out awards to the establishment-types that are pissing people off into blogging even more furiously!
    Cheers, you’re irrelevant!
    By the way, thought you’d all like to know, a very select group of all the most popular and beautiful kids just voted Tasty Manatees “The Best Blog Ever”! What an honor!

  25. 527 Freak Avatar
    527 Freak

    “…anti-establishment feeling that are fueling the Blogger Revolution”
    LOL.
    Dude, GOP and conservatives control all three branches of gov. Right now they are the establishment. Look around. What’s fueling the creativity on the Net right now is coming from the left: Marshall, the Dem candidate blogs, Meetup.com is dominated by liberals, Kos has reinvented the wheel.

  26. Scott Brodeur Avatar

    Jeff, I feel like I was at the party. What a great blog entry.
    I feel a slight need to page Dr. Freud when you get to the description of Josh’s blog, calling it a “well-red, well-regarded political blog.”

  27. HH Avatar

    Shouldn’t Blumenthal get an award as well as co-author?

  28. old maltese Avatar
    old maltese

    Scott — Ha! You beat me to it.

  29. Hipocrite Avatar
    Hipocrite

    When you lay down with dogs, Jeff, you stand up with fleas.

  30. Richard Bennett Avatar

    Jeff, this is a disgrace and I can’t believe you lent your name to it.
    Josh Marshall is nothing more than Sid Blumenthal and James Carville’s Voice in the Blogosphere, and his attack on Trent Lott was driven from DNC headquarters. Reynolds’ vote for Marshall was a proxy vote for himself, and the whole affair stinks to high heavens. The only prize Marshall deserves to win is “Krugman of the Blogosphere”.
    Sober up, dude.

  31. elizabeth spiers Avatar

    I don’t agree with everything Josh Marshall writes, but I think the award was well-deserved. And I don’t see any substantive critiques of his blog here–merely complaints that people don’t like the ideology behind his arguments. They’re called the *OPINION* Awards for a reason. “Too liberal” isn’t exactly an indictment, given that a point of view is presumed to exist for qualification as an opinion commentator. (Badly written, badly argued, would be legitimate but i don’t think that’s the case here.)
    Re: Tina ‘n’ Harry – I don’t think saying “it’s cool that they hosted the event at their house at what was essentially the last minute” constitutes fawning. i’ve learned the hard way (mostly from writing Gawker) that if you write snarky stuff all the time, people go ballistic when you say anything nice and accuse you of sucking up, regardless of the topic and regardless of the disincentives you have to say nice things (nobody wants to hear it, it’s not “what you do”, etc.) It’s impossible to be sincere and have it interpreted as a sincere comment. but that doesn’t mean it isn’t one.
    personally, even if i hated Tina (I don’t, but nonetheless), I’d still acknowledge that she and Harry were generous hosts. And even if I thought the award winners were ridiculous (and I don’t–which I think I can say with some credibility given that Choire and I were jointly nominated and we *lost*), I’d still think it speaks well of the blogosphere that The Week chose to include bloggers in its program when most establishment media doesn’t acknowledge them as professional peers (or did i just miss the award for blogging the Pulitzer board handed out this year?)

  32. Greg D Avatar

    Um, Elizabeth, let me put it in small words, so that hopefully even you can understand:
    Josh Marshall is a pathetic, partisan hack. He is not an independant thinker, honest, willing to learn new things, and actually think about the issues. He is a Democrat Party shill, who swallows and regurgitates the Party line regardless of what is actually going on.
    If that were the epitome of blogging, then blogging would be a worthless exercise. Since it isn’t, that means TPM should not have received the award.
    OTOH, calling someone “the Paul Krugman of the Blogsphere” is not a compliment, so perhaps he got what he deserved.
    Or maybe no self repecting blogger should have associated himself with the awards.

  33. Richard Bennett Avatar

    Did I just see the Queen of Snark complaining that others aren’t offering “Substantive Critiques” of the ersatz blog that won some phony award because the judges were patting themselves on their backs instead of honestly evaluating blogs?
    Yes, I believe I did.

  34. Mike Avatar

    I’m laughing to myself reading this. What a surprise every liberal or left of center (Friedman) writer/blogger won, IN EVERY CASE….. LOL! WHAT A SHOCKER!! Friedman still qualifies for awards because though he supported Iraq he still somehow wraps in criticism for the tax cut as well as mocks Bush while doing it.
    WINNERS –
    Josh Marshall
    Krugman
    Friedman
    LOSERS
    Sullivan, Malkin, Saffire, Mowbray, Reynolds, Kristol, WSJ writers, even Volkh and Kauss, slightly left and right of center…. Kauss who pulverizes the left from within on the same team get an award? And there’s a great writer/reporter at the Washington Times, (forget his name) whose broken more big stories than most…..
    NO PATTERN HERE FOLKS. (ahem)
    Mike