Neowhine

Neowhine
: David Brooks writes his obligatory neocons-are-just-regular-guys-not-conspirators column — “con is short for ‘conservative’ and neo is short for ‘Jewish’ ” — and that’s fine until the end, when he makes a sweeping generalization that is oddly paranoid and conspiratorial, considering that he just — properly — debunked conspiracy theories:

Still, there are apparently millions of people who cling to the notion that the world is controlled by well-organized and malevolent forces. And for a subset of these people, Jews are a handy explanation for everything.

There’s something else going on, too. The proliferation of media outlets and the segmentation of society have meant that it’s much easier for people to hive themselves off into like-minded cliques. Some people live in towns where nobody likes President Bush. Others listen to radio networks where nobody likes Bill Clinton.

In these communities, half-truths get circulated and exaggerated. Dark accusations are believed because it is delicious to believe them. Vince Foster was murdered. The Saudis warned the Bush administration before Sept. 11.

You get to choose your own reality. You get to believe what makes you feel good. You can ignore inconvenient facts so rigorously that your picture of the world is one big distortion.

And if you can give your foes a collective name

11 responses to “Neowhine”

  1. Roger L. Simon Avatar

    Absolutely agree. You just stole my blog subject for today–and I’m up early!

  2. anne.elk Avatar
    anne.elk

    You’ve missed Brooks’ biggest blunder: his idiotic, self-serving, bogus claim that any criticism of neoconservatives is anti-semitic in nature.
    George Soros, Paul Krugman, George Akerlof, Wesley Clark, Howard Dean, John Kerry…. Are any of these people anti-semitic? Am I?

  3. hen Avatar

    George Soros, Paul Krugman anti semitic? Oh heavens to betsy no. Why just ask them and they’ll tell you. Soros refers to Israel as a “tribal society” not a nation, goes out of his way to finance any whacked out group as long as the money doesn’t go to jews, etc. Krugman was and is an apologist for the Malaysian PM who is one of the most vitriolic anti semites to crawl out of his hole.
    So you tell me: Soros and Krugman anti semites? You bet.

  4. Eric Deamer Avatar

    I think anne.elk just proved Brooks’s point.

  5. button Avatar

    Scary!
    A few years ago, I came across a theory like this which alleged that this all started with Dungeons and Dragons. I am not sufficiently familiar with that game to ascertain how valid that theory was.

  6. mike.bison Avatar
    mike.bison

    anne.elk, how are we supposed to know if you’re an anti-semite? You’re just an anonymous poster on a blog without even a return email address. You could be an elephant, for allwe know.

  7. noam chimpsky Avatar
    noam chimpsky

    LOL…its so ironic that the critics of U.S. foreign policy are being called anti-semitic when the leading intellectuals in the left who are doing so are Jewish!
    And Brooks even manages to accuse GENERAL ZINNI of being anti-semitic!!! An all-time low.
    BTW for those who don’t think Neoconservatism exists, please reference this book:
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0028740211

  8. hen Avatar

    Don;t know if Zinni is an anti semite or not but he walks a very fine line with much of his utterances. But no need to let the facts get in the way of your denial.
    Oh and regarding the “Jewish Intellectual Left”, can you be more specific? And by that i mean explain to me how the left’s leaders are Jewish (and Lerner is no jew) or Intellectuals (this should be fun).

  9. anne.elk Avatar
    anne.elk

    Hen, sorry, I won’t play by your ground rules.
    If you’re going to claim that Rabbi Michael Lerner is “no Jew” then you’ve have no ground to stand on. In fact, the statement that Rabbi Michael Lerner is “no jew”, comes pretty damn close to anti-semitism itself.

  10. hen Avatar

    To the “Intellectual Left” “Rabbi” Lerner might be considered a jew, but my understanding is that his rabbinical degree is as phony as my Van Gogh.
    But whether Lerner is a jew or not, and i have my doubts, he is no “leader” of the left, so again, by all means point out the jews that are the intellectual leaders of the left.
    BTW – nice non response to the anti semitic bleatings of Krugman and Soros. Now would those be the jewish leaders we are referring to?
    With “jews” like these no wonder we have so many problems.

  11. Andy Freeman Avatar
    Andy Freeman

    > In fact, the statement that Rabbi Michael Lerner is “no jew”, comes pretty damn close to anti-semitism itself.
    Is it “pretty damn close” to racism to call Clarence Thomas an Uncle Tom?