The worst job in journalism, continued

The worst job in journalism, continued
: I just got a nice email from Dan Okrent, the New York Times’ new public editor (read: ombudsman) in response to my suggestions here about how to make his job, the worst in journalism, at least more entertaining. Well, he’s not going to do exactly what I suggest (he never would).

But note this: He reads weblogs. That’s how he saw what I’d said. That’s why he responded.

He says he’s “counting… on the blogworld to keep me on my woulda/coulda/shoulda toes.”

An auspicious start, eh?

I said back to Dan that though I do, in fact, believe he has the worst job in journalism:

Andrew Sullivan to the right of him,

Barbra Streisand to the left of him,

Timesmen in front of him

Volley’d and thunder’d;

Storm’d at with snark and screed,

Boldly, he wrote and well,

Into the jaws of Death,

Into the mouth of Hell

Rode the public editor

But I told him that I’m glad he’s doing this. It is an important job. I love the Times and I am tired of ceaseless Times-bashing for sport on the one hand and the opaqueness of the Times on the other hand. The mere fact that Okrent is now there will, I hope, do a good deal to disarm both armies and bring the discussion back to what is, in fact, the difficult business of trying to get it right. Dan is a good and smart man. Give him a chance. He’s beginning by listening. Can’t ask for better than that.

2 responses to “The worst job in journalism, continued”

  1. Arthur Avatar

    I’m more interested in his output. Are there plans for him to publish his ombusdmandorial points of view anywhere in The New York Times or on its web pages? So far, all I’ve been able to find are the notices that came out when he was named to the position.

  2. Jeff Avatar

    I think he’d generate a lot of goodwill by being the first at the Times to publicly criticize Maureen Dowd’s “creative” use of ellipses, particularly with the Bush “they’re not a problem anymore” quote.