European exceptionalism

European exceptionalism

: As I was out running this morning, I was listening to NPR (during a Howard Stern commercial break) and heard a lopsided interview with an Economist journalist about the magazine’s special report on American exceptionalism. The interviewer kept emphasizing how different America is from Europe. And I stopped in my tracks.

There is no one Europe, damnit. In fact, on this day of all days — on Veterans/Remembrance/Armistice Day — let us be sure to recall how different Europeans are from each other. Let us recall in fact, how much Europeans hate each other — so much that they have spent centuries warring with each other and drawing the rest of the world into their nationalistic, ethnic, and colonial battles and ambitions. The present EUification of Europe allegedly unifying the continent in governance, policy, politics, economy, and outlook is a new, tenuous, and quite unproven experiment that utterly defies the grain of history there. There is no one Europe and we are not the exception to it.

No, Europe is the exception today.

The Economist’s survey — from what I’ve read so far this morning [can’t finish reading it because the Economist site is down] — is far more nuanced and intelligent than that heat-seeking NPR interview [which isn’t online as I write this] would indicate, for it says that America is, indeed, a force for good:

The day after he had defined America’s enemies in his “axis of evil” speech, in January 2002, Mr Bush told an audience in Daytona Beach, Florida, about his country’s “mission” in the world. “We’re fighting for freedom, and civilisation and universal values.” That is one strand of American exceptionalism. America is the purest example of a nation founded upon universal values, such as democracy and human rights. It is a standard bearer, an exemplar.

That makes us an “exception,” to stand for democracy and human rights? Then I’d worry about the rest of the world. But no, I don’t really believe that. America is an exemplar of a worldview and a world hope to which I thought Europe subscribed but to which it is now, sadly, becoming distant if it believes that we are the great exception. After World War I and World War II and during the Cold War, it seemed that America and Europe were united in at least support of democracy and opposition to tyranny, dictatorship, genocide, and military conquest as a means of national expansion. It seemed we were united in friendship as well, though now we must wonder whether that was just sucking up to us because Europe needed us to face down the Soviet threat. Was Europe being a friend or a phoney? I prefer to go with the Economist’s analysis, Europe on the couch, which puts some of this continental snarking down to jealousy: “…incoherence is one of the luxuries of impotence,” says the Economist. “Those who cannot, or will not, take responsbility themselves feel free to snipe at those who do.”

It’s not America that changed. It’s Europe that changed. After September 11th, America is only perhaps more of what is already was: more devoted to democracy, more devoted to freedom (yes, freedom from the likes of Saddam and freedom from the threat of terrorism), more devoted to our responsibilities to uphold those values and the rights of people even in other lands against tyranny and genocide, and more determined to defend ourselves. Try as Europe might to paint black our motives in Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s fairly obvious that this is no picnic for us in the world. Argue with our methods and our success, fine. But motives? We used force in the defense of our own land and people and in defense of human rights against tyrannies. We are fighting for democracy or, yes, in Bush’s words, “for freedom, and civilization and universal values.” Sorry to have to point this out but on this day, it is appropriate to remember that Europe’s wars and international moves have historically been motivated instead by greed for land, money, and power and not for ideals.

What is Europe fighting for now? Europe is fighting against. Europe by this definition of us, is fighting against America for the sake of it, to be contrarian, to paint us as the exception when, in fact, it is Europe that is making itself the exception. And let’s not forget that Europe is, quite characteristically, fighting with itself: the Continent vs. Britain.

I’m tired of the new accepted wisdom that America is different. Europe — desperate for a new definition of itself — is the one standing apart. Europe is increasingly the exception.

: Update: The Economist survey is back up here. And here’s an NPR link.

20 responses to “European exceptionalism”

  1. hugh macleod Avatar

    Amen, Jeff. What “Europe” is actually doing at the moment is holding America to a higher standard than it ever intends to hold itself to. And as my father likes to say- holding anybody to higher standards than you hold yourself to is the first step down the road to tyranny.
    I’m sorry, but there is something slightly tyrannical about this whole Euro-anti-Americanism I’m witnessing.

  2. John Mendenhall Avatar
    John Mendenhall

    The Economist is the finest example of the old saw about the press being reliable until it writes about something the reader knows a lot about.
    That being said, I’m afraid Europe is doing the same old European two-step: dreaming up some stupid utopian idea under which the masters will finally make the serfs admit they are grateful and happy, and setting in motion the authoritarian mechanisms that will make it impossible for the serfs to say otherwise.
    If one removes Britain from Europe–an idea the Brits really need to give some thought to–the only thing Europeans have demonstrated for centuries now is the overwhelming need for adult supervision.
    In this sense, America is indeed exceptional; it is, time and again, we who must be the adults.

  3. Dann Avatar

    Jeff-
    One of the ultimate prices of leadership is to forever stand alone. We should be comforted and satisfied with the objective of liberty as being worthy of the price.
    This is the lesson of Veteran’s Day, and your entry is entirely appropriate on this day.
    -Regards

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    Sir-a quick comment on the views expressed in ‘european exceptionalism’,yes America stands for many great and enlighted ideas, the country was founded on principles of religous freedom and market capitalism, two important principles in light of resent world events. But, yes their’s allways a but, and this one is, if we are to be an example of ‘freedom’ then the u.s has to remain an arena of personal freedom- free of the prying eyes of an ‘ideology (right wing christian, a minority in this country) driven admin. Have you looked at patriot act part two?. How do we convince the world of American style democratic principles when we are losing them ourselves? It would do us good to take a look at sum of the rest of the world’s views on social justice. If this is a global community, we can not go it alone. This euro-bashing can be compared to the age old dance between a teenager and its parents. The world is grey not black and white.

  5. Reimer Behrends Avatar
    Reimer Behrends

    To generalize is to be an idiot. To particularize is the alone distinction of merit. — William Blake
    As a counterpoint, I’d like to submit that any statement that makes a judgement about “the USA”, “Europe”, “France”, “Germany”, “the Americans”, “the British”, “the French”, or any other heterogeneous group of individuals, whether good or bad, is prima facie false, nonsensical, and lacking in depth. I do not think that the argument needs or merits any additional counterargument.
    (And yes, I am aware of the self-referential irony in the Blake quote. That doesn’t negate my point.)

  6. Jeremy Avatar

    Well, the thing about generalizations, while the might not apply to everyone, they apply to most people in a group.
    For instance, while not every European hates Americans & Jews, most Europeans in fact do. And this is reflected in how their governments act, so the generalization is important way to explain why their governments act that way.

  7. Jeff Jarvis Avatar

    Well, Jeremy, I’d say that’s a bit strong. Part of my point about generalizing about Europeans is that that’s what it sounds like when they generalize about us. It’s not so simple, either way.

  8. Brother Nikko Avatar
    Brother Nikko

    Good Lordy, Lord!
    Msr. Anonymous certainly sums it all up in his closer, don’t he just now?
    “This euro-bashing can be compared to the age old dance between a teenager and its parents. The world is grey not black and white.”
    Gosh, Dad, thanks for the “adult” perspective. Can I borrow the keys to the Olds? I got a hot date with Cindy Lou, and “Rebel Without a Cause” is playing down at the Bijou tonight. Oh, and lend me a fiver? We’re meeting the gang at Mel’s for burgers and fries after. Thanks, Daddy-O!
    Just one question: Did this guy purposely leave out his sig, or was “Pompous Ass-clown” already taken?

  9. Reimer Behrends Avatar
    Reimer Behrends

    Jeremy wrote: For instance, while not every European hates Americans & Jews, most Europeans in fact do.
    And I take it that you can back that claim up by evidence stronger than vigorous handwaving and lots of hot air? I mean, I can give you this poll, which says exactly the opposite.

  10. linden Avatar

    I think the problem in Europe is that it is run by elites who hate the US and hate Jews. The elites pretty much run the governments and determine what appears in the press and on tv. Essentially, there isn’t enough freedom of speech and people only know what they’re told. And quite a few people are being told that the Jews are Nazis and the US is evil, that capitalism is evil. The US has similar problems with elite control, but the stranglehold is nowhere near as great. This is best exemplified by the incredible diversity of opinion here as well as dissent. There doesn’t seem to be any diversity of opinion in EUrope, or at least any ‘diversity’ exists within a very narrow spectrum.
    The most interesting thing about the current intl situation with Europe and the Arab world is that both project their pathologies onto the US and Israel.
    If this situation can be compared to the relationship between a parent and child, then the US is the parent and EUrope is the child. Afterall, it is the parent that protects the child and Europe is essentially a dependent. This is also shown by the lack of seriousness toward Islamist terror and nuclear proliferation. I mean who but the most naive, childish person would actually believe that Iran would honestly cooperate with them?

  11. hugh macleod Avatar

    As a European, my own opinion is the Euro-demonification of America is it’s there for a reason. America, for all its problems, has its successes. And those successes make the European political and cultural elite look bad.
    So when confronted with it, all they can say is,
    “Oh, their economy only grew 7% last quarter… because they’re evil!!! Ours shrank one percent… because we had to implement all these wonderful new laws, business regulations, reforms and bureaucratic structures to make our society more just, equal and virtuous!!!”
    The trouble is; they’ve been using this rube for 40 years, and it’s no longer working very well.
    Just my two cents…

  12. tm Avatar

    I live in one of the countries of “Old Europe.” It is clear to me that something has gone seriously wrong here.
    But it’s certainly not the case that most Europeans hate Americans and Jews.
    What I find most troubling about the political dynamics here is that these tendencies which are quite negative and potentially dangerous are grounded in idealism and morality. (Menander: “The chief beginning of evil is goodness in excess”; Martin Luther King: “Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincerely ignorant and conscientious stupidity.”)
    Europe has learned the lesson of the holocaust, and the lesson it has learned is the importance of respecting otherness. Nowadays immigrants from Muslim countries and their children occupy this category of the paradigmatic “other.”
    Europe has learned that the primary cause of its catastrophes was nationalism. Hence, its rejection, and the creation of a post-national polity which aims to dissolve the sovereignty of nation-states.
    Europe is ridden with guilt over its colonial past. (At the same time, the details are often quite unknown; here in Belgium, most people know nothing about the horrors of the holocaust in the Belgian Congo: 10 million dead.)
    But Europe thinks it has broken free of history, and has forever renounced power politics, militarism, nationalism, and these other instances of backwardness which the US and Israel–alone in the West–still refuse to renounce.

  13. linden Avatar

    “Europe has learned the lesson of the holocaust, and the lesson it has learned is the importance of respecting otherness. Nowadays immigrants from Muslim countries and their children occupy this category of the paradigmatic “other.”
    But they don’t actually respect “Otherness”. You can’t square this with the demonization of Jews and Americans in Europe today. Their attitude toward Muslims and other people from the 3rd world strikes me as very racist, infantilizing as well as patronizing. The constant singling out of Israel for behavior that no one else blinks an eye about when an Arab or an African country does worse. The ‘noble savage’ is an incredibly racist concept. The fact that you would label Muslims as the “Other” speaks volumes. They are not the “Other”, and, if they’re going to live among you, then they should be held to the same standards you hold yourself. When I think of Jewish-Americans and Muslim Americans, I do not regard them as the “Other”. I regard them as Americans.
    Europe has learned that the primary cause of its catastrophes was nationalism. Hence, its rejection, and the creation of a post-national polity which aims to dissolve the sovereignty of nation-states.”
    Yes, but there is a world of difference between love of country and the sort of nationalism that leads one to believe gasing your neighbors is an unqualified good. Europe has gone from one extreme to another. Neither extreme is healthy. The US has a middle ground when it comes to something like this. One’s love of country and gasing your neighbors are not the same thing. Europe can only see America through the prism of its own history. They need to realize that religiosity and patriotism mean something very different in the US.

  14. Sandy P. Avatar

    No, Europe has not learned the lessons of WWII.
    Because Europe is on the same path again.
    And Europe’s buds the Palis are Europe’s proxy to finish the job Europe started. Not only are you turning your back again, you’re funding it. Arafat isn’t worth $800 mill and the PLA(?) worth an estimated $50 BILL because of their investment prowess.
    –What I find most troubling about the political dynamics here is that these tendencies which are quite negative and potentially dangerous are grounded in idealism and morality.–
    Europe thinks we dangerous because we have them, we think Europe’s dangerous because they don’t. Sometimes the world is black and white. Because we’ve been living in gray for 30, 40-odd years now is why we’re in this.
    It doesn’t do you any good respecting otherness when otherness doesn’t not only not respect you, but wants to kill you because you are not them.
    Remember: They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

  15. tm Avatar

    In one of the lectures at this conference (and I recommend in particular those by Finkielkraut, Berman, Caldwell, Joffe, and Lilla), the point is made that in France something like 17% have negative attitudes towards Jews, while the percentage is 40-something for Muslims.
    The racism is real. The parties of the far right get more than 15% of the vote in some countries. And post-colonial guilt is also guilt about European (especially French) colonialism in the Muslim world. That’s why Muslims have become the paradigmatic “other.”
    The US has been an immigrant country for as long as it has existed. In Europe nationality and ethnicity have been closely linked, and the mental transition is not going to happen instantaneously. Here in Belgium the grandchildren of Italian immigrants are also considered “immigrants”: they’re third-generation immigrants. It’s not the “noble savage” idea.

  16. Pele Avatar

    I don’t want to generalize either but all Americans shoot each other when they are not stuffing their bloated bodies when hamburgers and stealing oil.

  17. A Crawford Avatar
    A Crawford

    TM (from Belgium?) writes: “…Europe has learned that the primary cause of its catastrophes was nationalism. Hence, its rejection, and the creation of a post-national polity which aims to dissolve the sovereignty of nation-states…. Europe is ridden with guilt over its colonial past. (At the same time, the details are often quite unknown; here in Belgium, most people know nothing about the horrors of the holocaust in the Belgian Congo: 10 million dead.)… But Europe thinks it has broken free of history, and has forever renounced power politics, militarism, nationalism, and these other instances of backwardness which the US and Israel–alone in the West–still refuse to renounce…”
    I think there’s a lot to the US-EU communication breakdown that stems from this worldview holding a place in a fair number of ‘internationalist’ hearts on both sides of the Atlantic. To an American placing individual States within a larger Federal political super-structure evokes a picture of our COUNTRY, the United States, but certainly not the END of the Nation-State (duh!). How can an EU Constitution of 250 ish pages be OTHER than a Federal Nation-State??? The expectation claimed seems to contradict itself.
    European ‘guilt’ over it’s colonial past is also a source of confusion in the US, which is after all a product of European colonial expansion. Isn’t the UN built on the foundation of European colonial empires in place of the failed League of Nations? Doesn’t the failure of the League of Nations have an understood set of principle root causes? Such as??
    How can Europe ‘break free of power politics’ while organizing the EU as a world power block? How can Europe renounce militarism while organizing its own military independent of NATO? How can Europeans imagine it’s possible to renounce ANYTHING while their goverments are forming a European Union to ENGAGE in the exact same behavior the populce has renounced?
    Just how should Americans view the suggestion that it’s a sign of US (and Israeli??) ‘backwardness’ that we won’t renounce attitudes and powers that the EU Constitution has reserved itself? It’s all very confusing.
    (I don’t mean to misrepresent the spirit of tm’s original post. if I have, I apologize)

  18. tm Avatar

    Part of the problem is the existence of Parallel Universes. But there is also the matter of fundamentally different interpretations of history.
    In the American gestalt, I think that maybe Raymond Aron’s view is the default position: both National Socialism and Soviet Communism are best understood as secular religions.
    That’s obviously a different view than the standard European one, which sees nationalism as the root cause of the 20thC catastrophes.
    It’s interesting to hear how many people here see the Cold War: a struggle between the US and the Soviet Union over who would be the big boss. And that goes hand in hand with the view that the US needs an external enemy: i.e. a paranoid view of the Soviet Union was fostered in order to underwrite a foreign policy which sought hegemony and commercial profit, using a demonized enemy as a pretext.
    Given those presuppositions, you can see the basis for a view of the US response to 9/11 as a pretext for establishing an empire. And Europe’s view of its own importance contributes to the view that the war in Iraq was partly about limiting European power: i.e., it was partly aimed against Europe.
    I’m not endorsing these views. But I think it’s important for engaged Americans to understand that Europe thinks it’s what’s “new” and the US is “old,” and it thinks it’s on the moral high ground while the US is a conservative, reactionary, and imperialistic entity.
    It’s also important to realize degree to which “lifestyle” has replaced “politics” here, as one of the speakers at that conference on antisemitism said.
    A Crawford is right to point to some of the contradictions, but people here tend to be blind to these contradictions.

  19. Andrew X Avatar

    Thoughts at random regarding above comments.
    The “US parent”, “Euro-Child” is indeed patronizing, but there is truth to it, in that US democracy is 220 years old, while European democracy is a 20th century phenomena. But the best way to see it, and to frame the bitter conflict, is that the problem is not that “Europe is the Child”… it is that they are NOT, any more. They are (in human individual years), say, 26 years old….. and still living under Dad’s roof. Meanwhile, in typical Sixties-era fashion, they take to the streets to confront ‘The Man’, spit on his values, tell him he’s a fascist sellout, etc, and then go home comfortably back to Daddy’s roof that they are not paying for, and not considering what is required to maintain it. My fear for the Western Alliance (NATO), is that it may take separation for both sides, but Europe particularly, to start defending itself without us, in order for both sides to start seeing each other more maturely and realistically.
    I might also mention that many see the US as “always having to have an enemy”. Take this to account though. So-called “capitalism” has been a way of human existence since time began. It has been exploitive, and it has been enriching, and all points in-between. Who is it’s “enemy”? There isn’t an inherent one, except in that human beings have made enemies of each other also since time began.
    Now take “socialism”, a faith whose Christ is Marx, with help from Engels. It didn’t really exist as a philosophy before them. And lo and behold, socialism has REQUIRED an “enemy”, from moment one. Be it the bourgousie, the capitalists, the plutocrats, the kulaks, the landlords, the running dogs, and now… the Republicans and the Jews. Always, always, always, socialism has NEVER existed without an enemy that must be overcome in order for our little socialist paradise to come to being. ‘Course, many times those enemies have been wiped out, and “socialism” never got an inch closer, but “our 19th century Christ said it is so, ergo it must be.
    Socialists now are profoundly entrenched in Europe and Britains cultural institutions, civil services, and governments. Meanwhile, Republicans are gradually pushing American rightward as the socialists push Europe left. The question is not why are we at odds so much as how could we not be?