Ann Coulter, symptom

Ann Coulter, symptom
: The Guardian goes into the lion’s cage with Ann Coulter, “columnist, TV star, bestselling author, heroine for the ultra-right and hate figure for what remains of liberal America.” Ouch.

They make the mistake of trying to see her as emblematic or symptomatic of the deeper American psyche. No. She’s a sideshow: Morton Downey on good legs. She’s entertainment.

I found one surprising observation in the story. It’s accepted wisdom here that Europeans — and, for that matter, much of the rest of the world — cares about, talks about, and thinks about politics more than we do.

The Guardian says the opposite, using Coulter as its evidence:

Coulter’s success represents a feature of US life that separates it starkly from most countries, including Britain. She benefits from, and is now a star player in, a polemical culture that has made political argument a mass activity. Scan the top-selling books in Britain and it’s all gardening and cookery. Look at what America’s buying and it’s non-fiction books of argument. Every new Bob Woodward tome on the US government becomes a smash hit, while slash-and-burn polemic – whether it’s Coulter on the right or Michael Moore on the left – sells by the crateload. Maybe it’s to compensate for the cautious style of US newspapers or the bland, neutered language of mainstream US politicians. A gap has opened in American political culture and motor-mouths like Ann Coulter are filling it.

Maybe so.

15 responses to “Ann Coulter, symptom”

  1. Mike G Avatar
    Mike G

    Well, at least it’s also apparently accepted wisdom over there that American newspapers and columnists are as boring as they truly are…

  2. Aaron Avatar

    Ann Coulter is Michael Moore for conservatives. Better-looking, but just as stupid. If you told her that Republicans were for incest and Democrats were against it, she would be singing the praises of incest.

  3. Donnah Avatar
    Donnah

    Hee! I like her because she can’t be intimidated.

  4. George Avatar
    George

    Coulter’s none too popular amongst us righties, either. Just ask Jonah Goldberg.

  5. lindenen Avatar
    lindenen

    Oh, no. Did you guys actually look at what else the Guardian wrote?
    Jonathan Freedland confronts her and recognises a truth about the United States today: Bush isn’t an aberration and Coulter expresses what many Americans think.
    The woman’s practically a neo-nazi. She does not reflect the majority of American opinion.

  6. Matt McIrvin Avatar

    The analogy I usually make is this: Michael Moore is the Rush Limbaugh of the right. Ann Coulter is the Jello Biafra of the right. She needs to get into spoken-world albums.

  7. Matt McIrvin Avatar

    Uh, Moore and Limbaugh: Strike that. Reverse it. I’m turning into Willy Wonka in my dotage.

  8. Van der Leun Avatar
    Van der Leun

    Coulter has a lot of whacky ideas, but she redeems herself forever in my eyes through this one, very recent, paragraph:
    ”

  9. carl Avatar

    No reason to beat up on Coulter…It’s about time we have her rationale, yet extreme thinking, supporting us…

  10. Jack Tanner Avatar
    Jack Tanner

    ‘The woman’s practically a neo-nazi.’
    Based on what? She’s not a liberal? The reason liberals dislike her is that she uses the same level of hyperbole that is the general discourse and rationale for liberals. The only difference is that she’s right and they’re not.

  11. manon Avatar

    Saying that Clinton’s lies about his affair sent out the message that it’s okay to lie, and that is what caused the obscenities at Enron, WorldCom, etc. is right?
    Saying that women shouldn’t have the vote because they’ll only be stupid enough to support Democrats is right?
    Misquoting her detractors, then not having the grace to admit it is right?
    Tossing out a continual spew of puerile name-calling, than saying that it is impossible to debate with the Left because they’re a bunch of hysterical name callers is right?
    Claiming knowledge about the Middle East based on the fact that she once-dated an American-Arab is right?
    To name but a paltry few —
    This you call hyperbole? Oy!
    This I call self-serving claptrap and misinformation.
    It may be Right, but it sure ain’t right.

  12. Jack Tanner Avatar
    Jack Tanner

    But when Clinton says there were church burnings that never were, Donna Brazile implies the GOP wants black children to starve it’s no different. The reason the left doesn’t like Ann Coulter is that she beats them at heir own demonization game. Big difference is that she’s a columnist not a politician.

  13. Poot Avatar

    Realistically, IS there any difference between a political columnist and a politician?
    I dislike anyone who relies on hyperbole and demonization to spread a message rather than rational discussion, whether they represent the Left or the Right. Coulter’s essential defense is that she’s just sinking down to her opposition’s level, which doesn’t excuse her or her opposition.

  14. Jack Tanner Avatar
    Jack Tanner

    ‘IS there any difference between a political columnist and a politician?’
    Uhhhhh…..Yeah! One is a paid professional who generally works for a private corporation who you can choose to read or listen to or write about or not. That person usually works under a mutual agreement with their sponsor which can generally be terminated at any time by either party. The other is an elected official who usually has some legislative or executive power over the citizenry and can generally stay as long as they’re reelected. In other words I can listen to or watch any of the media types I want or don’t want but I can’t turn off Dick Armey or Nancy Pelosi. That’s why it’s different.

  15. skimble Avatar

    “Think of it in a nonracial context: Suppose the owner of a big company sends his kid to learn the business and tells low-level managers to treat him just like anyone else.