Guerilla media

Guerilla media
: Glenn Reynolds’ Tech Central Station column today announces the arrival of guerilla media — multimedia, actually: the addition of photos and video (not to mention sound) to this medium of the people, by the people, and for the people, our web. This includes not just the “vlog” opinion pieces so dear to my heart but photos from the scene of news now coming onto web sites and also video reports like Evan Coyne Maloney’s inspired interviews with anti-war protesters (by the way, shouldn’t they be called “war protesters,” since it’s war they’re protesting rather than antiwar… oh, nevermind, I’m getting tangled up in an aside of double negatives). All this is made possible, Glenn points out, by not only easy publishing tools (read: weblogs) but also by cheap media tools (read: great and inexpensive new cameras and software).

Now tie this to Michael Wolff’s latest New York magazine column arguing that there is a severe deflation in the value of content — to the point that consumers are expecting it to be free — and you have a Richter-scale shift coming in media:

The cost of media production is falling to near-zero at the same time that the retail value of content is falling rapidly.

I’m not sure exactly where this leads us (and I eagerly await my lunchtime or emailtime discussion about it with Clay Shirky.) But I think it leads to the nuclear nichefication of media: Because the barrier to entry into media (the cost of the printing press, as we used to say) is collapsing, then anyone can produce media about anything and there can be as many publishers and producers as there are interests.

The problem with this is that no one will make money: Consumers (who already supposedly don’t value content enough to pay for it) will now have even more choice and will pay even less. Advertisers, who subsidize content, will find it more and more difficult to reach audiences of scale. And without money to support quality content, quality will fall.

Of course, this won’t go to the extreme; there will always be distribution networks (via cable and newsstands) that put together larger audiences and make money. But in a world where a great deal of content can be delivered around those networks, the economics of content do change radically.

Watch this space…

3 responses to “Guerilla media”

  1. misanthropyst Avatar

    Quality will fall? You mean no more ‘Bachelor Millionaires’ or Jerry Springer or ‘Top Police Pursuit Crashes’ or Parade Magazine or NY Times punditry?
    I think the next step is a functional micropayment system. And then this evolution in current business models will continue.

  2. henry Avatar

    Scarcity drives up prices. Advertisers… will find it more and more difficult to reach audiences of scale. Doesn’t this failure mean (much) higher prices for advertising strategies that succeed in penetrating the wall of ad/info noise? Yes old ad metrics — reach, frequency, demographics — will get swamped, but today’s advertisers won’t give up and file Chapter 11. They’ll look for new outlets, new metrics. Even Shirky (quietly) admits that advertising will persist, but will just flow to better connected/lower-overhead nanomedia. (Or might we call it “nude” media? :)

  3. M. Simon Avatar
    M. Simon

    In the long run media expenditures will rise.
    Because advertising to targeted audiences is cheaper than advertising to the masses.
    Advertising will actually be more expensive on a per view basis and less expensive on a per sale basis.