Duct and cover

Duct and cover
: Some folks wonder, in my comments, why I’m being so rough on Tom Ridge and his advice on how to prepare for a terrorist attack.

Simple:

Not a single thing Ridge advises — not one single thing — would have helped a single victim of 9/11. They all would have died anyway.

So we’re fooling ourselves — or he’s fooling us — if we think we’re “prepared” for the next attack.

It’s bull — dangerous bull, if it lulls people into thinking they are prepared when they are not … when they are, in fact, f’ed.

If a bomb goes off around my office at Times Square, we’re f’ed.

If a bomb goes off in the subway I ride every day, we’re f’ed.

If a biological attack sneaks up on us, we’re f’ed.

Whistles won’t do a damned bit of good; neither will duct tape or plastic wrap or cereal bars or batteries or pictograms of Americans choking on terrorist gasses.

We’re f’ed. We’re not prepared. To act as if we are is a dangerous lie.

That’s why I’m tough on Tom.

: Credit Scott for the catchphrase of the age: “Duct and cover.”

5 responses to “Duct and cover”

  1. paul Avatar

    not saying i disagree with you on ridge — but you can’t really shoot down his advice w/ offering some advice of your own.
    that being said … what kind of advice would YOU offer people to prepare them in the event of a terrorist attack?
    …how CAN you prepare someone for that?

  2. Scott Chaffin Avatar

    First and foremost, you’re a survivor, and you know far better than me what it was like on that day. So don’t misunderstand what I’m saying here.
    What I’m saying is that we cannot limit our thinking and our actions to the one thing that we know from first-hand experience. Frankly, I can’t think of a single thing that I, a guy in Texas, could have done that would have stopped the horrifics of 9/11 or eased the pandemonium from that day. Nor can I think of anything I CAN do that would stop another replay of that, short of electing officials with a finer sense of security, or being on a plane with hijackers and having a chance to fight back (harder these days since I can’t carry an edged weapon with me on the 50 flights I take every year.) I don’t think this is what you’re saying, though.
    I do strongly believe, however, that basic emergency preparedness is necessary for the general public. It can be the difference in life and death, even in a situation similar to 9/11. This I believe, and nothing I’ve read has shown this to be wrong. How many people died because they were not alert and did not know how quickly to leave or which exit they should take? I don’t know the answer to that question, and I don’t know if I want to. And that’s just one part of what ready.gov has on offer. I don’t think this is what you’re saying, either, though.
    I also believe that the next attack, should it come, will not be like the first attack. We don’t know the form it will take, but we can make some educated guesses. And from what I read, the advice given by DHS makes sense in that context. Is it infallible? Of course not. Is it applicable to everybody? Of course not. Should everybody at least consider it? I say yes. And for the record, I don’t think this is what you’re saying, either.
    I’m gonna go out on a limb and disagree with you on your scenarios. You don’t have to automatically be f’ed in any of them, unless you’re standing next to the bomber. There are methodologies that will allow folks to survive the initial attack, and the pandemonium and chaos that ensues. You yourself are a living testament to that.
    I’m dancing around the issue in the interest of not trampling on your sensitivities. I agree whole-heartedly that ready.gov is not the be-all, end-all of individual preparedness. But it’s a much-needed (and ridiculously tardy) start. It’s not going to stop terrorists slipping through immigrations, but it can help the next set of targets get through the hours and possibly days of chaos following an attack, should (God forbid) one come. And that’s the whole point of the whole thing.
    P.S. Stay tough on Tom — I’ve got no problem with that. But don’t write off version 1.0 of Civil Defense 2003 the day it launches, just beacuse it looks bad on teevee or because it has bad writing.

  3. Scott Avatar

    You can’t be prepared. This is all smoke and mirrors to make folks feel like they’re safe and ready to handle things.
    I’m also tired of hearing about the need for us to be “vigilant.” Please, credit us with some intelligence? I work in Manhattan (laterally in the same company as Jeff), and anyone who walks the streets here has always been vigilant — if not, bad things would happen to them. You learn.
    Sept. 11th couldn’t be stopped by the person in the street, and none of this is going to help in any way.
    Scott — why not write it off? If this were a television show or a magazine, bad writing would see it cancelled almost immediately (barring “When Terrorists Attack” on FOX).

  4. Scott Avatar

    Oh, and thanks for the mention, Jeff. Much appreciated.

  5. Scott Chaffin Avatar

    OK — I’m waving the white flag. Blogospheric Peer Pressure has beaten me down. I don’t think it’s total smoke and mirrors, but I’m not here to change your mind. I wasn’t gonna write it off because it’s been out for a whole three days and something good might come of it yet. But if yall think it sucks and is stupid, then that’s fine. I’ll shut up.
    P.S. I’m not so earnest and humorless that I’m not loving the parodies…some of those have been pretty damn funny.