‘Change’ is bullshit

I ended up voting for Barack Obama, but while he was in a race against Hillary Clinton his campaign slogan drove me to distraction. “Change we can believe in.” What change exactly?

This morning Joe Scarborough said the first debate of this campaign didn’t alter the situation in this election. He said this is still a race of the experienced candidate against the change candidate. Now Donald Trump=change.

Clinton is forever boxed into the position of running against “change.” Now it is not only Trump but also, ironically, Obama who corners her there because she wisely wants to run on and continue Obama’s legacy with his coalition; she can’t change too much. Still, she can address this problem by cataloging the changes she will make; there are many.

But “change” is the wrong word. “Change” is bullshit. “Change” is an empty word, a vague promise. Obama promised “change” and it was a vessel into which his supporters poured their dreams. The most progressive among them were disappointed in the early years of his administration because he did not quickly accomplish all they had wished for. I was not disappointed, for I had more realistic expectations of change.

The proper word is not “change” but “progress.” But that word has its own set of expectations and cooties thanks to the far left and right, respectively. So call it “improvement.” Hillary Clinton will work to improve health care,college costs, infrastructure, criminal justice, mental health, national security, the environment, taxation, campaign finance, the status of womenand minorities….

Donald Trump does not promise change. He promises regression, returning to some squandered glory of the hegemony his supporters have lost because of change they could not control, change they resent, change that shares what they think of as their jobs, power, and birthright with others, with outsiders. Trump is not promising to change. He is promising to stop change.

Of course, change is occurring without the intervention of any candidate. Change is the constant. Change brings us choices: opportunities and perils. That is what a leader must concern herself with.

Clinton is a realist. She is experienced. She has policies and plans. All those proper qualifications for the highest office in the land become handicaps in a media environment that values instead slogans, performance, conflict, entertainment, and personality over substance. “Make American great again.”

After Scarborough spoke this morning, Chuck Todd complained that after last night’s debate voters don’t know much more about the candidates’ policies. First, that’s wrong. Clinton tried to cram specific policy proposals into her few uninterrupted minutes and for the rest she gave her web address; plenty there. Trump refused to and could not be pushed to be specific about the plans he does not have. If voters do not know what each candidate will do and is capable of doing the fault lies at the feet of the media. It is our job to inform the public. The public is ill-informed. Donald Trump’s presence on that stage last night is the evidence. He promises nothing but change. And we let him get away with it.

  • Phil Stephens

    I am watching this from Australia, so it is not my election But the rest of the world (as in US) are terrified of Trump. I do not want a US president who thinks dropping nukes is a “menu of the day” decision.
    I think America is about to elect Zaphod Beeblebrox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaphod_Beeblebrox) to the presidency.

    Mind you, If he CAN find the Infinite Probability Drive (http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Infinite_Improbability_Drive ) I might forgive him…

  • Pingback: Trump ≠ Change()

  • Thing is, “improvement” is woefully inadequate for what we need to do about thew Climate Crisis. “Change” , as you say, is bullshit writ large here, too. The whole concept of “change” limits the vision of what it will take economically, infra-structurally, and ideologically, to get to Ecological Civilization. “Improvement” screams incrementalism that is hardly more effective as a response than ignoring it. It actually acts as a way to ignore it. “Let’s not get TOO obsessed with this Climate Crisis thing” , right? Let’s “take it slow”.

  • Markus Graphic

    Amazing. Thank you because you’ve shared. and allow me to share this to my social media.
    https://markusgraphic.com

  • Pingback: ‘Change’ is bullshit – JOURNALISM NOW()

  • Pingback: ‘Change’ is bullshit | JOURNALISM NOW()