Selling ads by time, not space

I just saw some mind-bending work Chartbeat is about to release about measuring the time users spend exposed to an ad online.

As background, to quote Chartbeat CEO Tony Haile: “Chartbeat monitors activity by checking in with users every second and looking for signals (mouse movement, key strokes, etc) that show they are actively consuming the content in front of them. This means they can measure how long readers spend actively engaged on a page and what parts they’re reading. Because of this Chartbeat knows how long are actively reading while an ad is in view — both for an average user and the cumulative time of all users.” Chartbeat then did some internal research that found high correlation between engaged time exposed and a user’s ability to recall the advertiser’s brand and message. This has many implications:

* Measured this way, ads that appear down alongside the middle of a story turn out to be more valuable than the supposedly premium banners at the top of the page. That’s because people quickly scroll past those banners and all the big hair on the top of the page — logos, promos, and all that — to get to the substance of an article, where they spend time. So inventory that was undervalued becomes more valuable.

* Chartbeat suggests this means that quality content that engages people longer yields better ad performance. That, they say, would be a good thing for better content makers everywhere.

* Now web publishers can sell time like broadcasters — only this is assured exposure time. Advertisers like buying time. Will this make them more comfortable with buying on the web?

* I think this enables publishers to take on some risk for advertisers — guaranteeing them assured exposure time — thus increasing the value of what they sell.

* I wonder whether this spells trouble for the big-ass ads and takeovers we users try to escape as quickly as possible.

* I also wonder whether this spells trouble for the slideshows and other gimmicks that pump page views without increasing time spent exposed to an ad.

* I’d like to think this opens opportunities to find new value in ads next to videos and games and also — this could be important — mobile pages (though don’t think that mobile’s value will come from exposure to messaging; it will still come from knowing people and serving them relevance and value). The longer we spend on a page, the longer we see the ad, the more valuable the ad should be, right?

* I can only hope that this is another nail in the coffin of the dangerous, old-media-like metrics of unique users and pageviews. Engagement will matter more.

A sample report on an ad location:

Screenshot 2013-05-15 at 8.20.04 PM

Those who declare advertising dead are Mark-Twaining-it, I think. There are still many things to learn to find more effectiveness and value in advertising online. This is just one lesson. I say the real value of the net and mobile is in relationships: in learning more about people by delivering them more value so we can be trusted to deliver them greater relevance and value and, in turn, extract greater value from the interaction. More on that later….

  • Pingback: Tempo Vs Spazio | Il Giornalaio

  • Daniele

    I wonder how users’ activity can be (reliably) measured on a tablet.

  • http://blog.ubervu.com/ dragosilinca

    This is an interesting approach, but a bit deceptive. I was pretty engaged with this article, even taking the time to post a comment. Yet all I can recall in terms of ads is that there was a red one and a yellow one in the sidebar. The colors caught my eye, but I didn’t really take time to see what they were about.

    Users focus their eyes and attention very narrowly while reading, so just because an ad gets some screen space while I’m reading doesn’t mean I’m seeing it. However, this opens up interesting possibilities in terms of creative and in-page placement.

    • http://twitter.com/arctictony Tony Haile

      You’re absolutely right that it doesn’t guarantee you see it. What the data does suggest however is that there is a direct correlation between the amount of time an ad is in view while you are in an engaged state and your likelihood of recall etc. The implications thus are clear and somewhat intuitive, if you want to increase the chances of your ad actually being seen, then the more that ad is in front of someone’s face the more likely that is. What that means is that advertisers choosing to advertise around quality content that captures people’s attention are making a smart bet.

    • http://twitter.com/johanneskoponen Johannes Koponen

      A study by Pricewaterhousecoopers claimed that brand recall and brand recognition correlated with actual exposure time, so it’s possible that it really does not matter if you look at the ads (as you do in TV) or just spend time reading things next to them.

      Nevertheless, more interesting than advertisement is measuring the impact of a story based on actual engagement (not only time spent, but scrolling behavior as well). Full disclosure: we do that at Scoopinion, where we aggregate long stories based on measured exposure

  • http://www.kumartalks.com/ Kumara S Raghavendra

    Interesting. But I still believe that ads that users quickly skip past at the top of the page get noticed more than the ones on the sidebar next to the content being read. If somebody is engrossed in the content, she will not take her eyes off the content to look at the ad next to it, until she has completed reading the article. Hence, the spots at the top and the bottom of the content hold more value even though their screen exposure time is less than that of the ads on the sidebar.

  • Pingback: Bannere – hvad der sker på 150 millisekunder | Hennings blog

  • Pingback: The First Word: Chartbeat Publishing for Ad Sales « Chartbeat | News from the Chartbase

  • ailton santos oliveira

    eu preciso que cancelem , bloquei ..excluam do meu face o meu fred de página obrigado

  • ailton santos oliveira

    excluir o fred de página

  • Pingback: 9 Stories You Need To Know Today - PSFK

  • Pingback: Warp3D

  • Pingback: 2D 1.0

  • Pingback: NinjaBean

  • Pingback: Basta ‘’pagine viste’’, il vero valore è nell’ attenzione e nel coinvolgimento | LSDI

  • منال احمد

    What is Forex
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/

    FOREX — the
    foreign exchange market or currency market or Forex is the market where
    one currency is traded for another. It is one of the largest markets in
    the world.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    Some of the participants in this market are simply
    seeking to exchange a foreign currency for their own, like multinational
    corporations which must pay wages and other expenses in different
    nations than they sell products in. However, a large part of the market
    is made up of currency traders, who speculate on movements in exchange
    rates, much like others would speculate on movements of stock prices.
    Currency traders try to take advantage of even small fluctuations in
    exchange rates.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    In the foreign exchange market there is little or
    no ‘inside information’. Exchange rate fluctuations are usually caused
    by actual monetary flows as well as anticipations on global
    macroeconomic conditions. Significant news is released publicly so, at
    least in theory, everyone in the world receives the same news at the
    same time.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    Currencies are traded against one another. Each pair
    of currencies thus constitutes an individual product and is
    traditionally noted XXX/YYY, where YYY is the ISO 4217 international
    three-letter code of the currency into which the price of one unit of
    XXX currency is expressed. For instance, EUR/USD is the price of the
    euro expressed in US dollars, as in 1 euro = 1.2045 dollar.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    Unlike
    stocks and futures exchange, foreign exchange is indeed an interbank,
    over-the-counter (OTC) market which means there is no single universal
    exchange for specific currency pair. The foreign exchange market
    operates 24 hours per day throughout the week between individuals with
    Forex brokers, brokers with banks, and banks with banks. If the European
    session is ended the Asian session or US session will start, so all
    world currencies can be continually in trade. Traders can react to news
    when it breaks, rather than waiting for the market to open, as is the
    case with most other markets.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    Average daily international foreign
    exchange trading volume was $4.0 trillion in April 2010 according to
    the BIS triennial report.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    Like any market there is a bid/offer
    spread (difference between buying price and selling price). On major
    currency crosses, the difference between the price at which a market
    maker will sell (“ask”, or “offer”) to a wholesale customer and the
    price at which the same market-maker will buy (“bid”) from the same
    wholesale customer is minimal, usually only 1 or 2 pips. In the EUR/USD
    price of 1.4238 a pip would be the ‘8’ at the end. So the bid/ask quote
    of EUR/USD might be 1.4238/1.4239.
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/a
    This, of course, does not
    apply to retail customers. Most individual currency speculators will
    trade using a broker which will typically have a spread marked up to say
    3-20 pips (so in our example 1.4237/1.4239 or 1.423/1.425). The broker
    will give their clients often huge amounts of margin, thereby
    facilitating clients spending more money on the bid/ask spread. The
    brokers are not regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
    (since they do not sell securities), so they are not bound by the same
    margin limits as stock brokerages. They do not typically charge margin
    interest, however since currency trades must be settled in 2 days, they
    will “resettle” open positions (again collecting the bid/ask spread).
    http://wifxt.blogspot.com/
    Individual
    currency speculators can work during the day and trade in the evenings,
    taking advantage of the market’s 24 hours long trading day

  • Pingback: Zeitbasierte WerbungsabrechnungCappuccinoSoft | CappuccinoSoft

  • Will Overstreet

    Very good article. From our work with media clients, we have seen the struggle they have appeasing agencies and brands that are asking for more engagement.

    The biggest challenge we have found does not come from ways in which to provide these experiences for the sponsor, the real challenge is communicating and teaching the sales team how to sell engagement when all they are use to selling are banner ads.

    We usually end up having to run training seminars to help teach them how to talk and think about engagement for advertisers.

  • John

    Another issue that I could see is idle times. There are times where I will leave my computer with a webpage up and ads floating all over the page. I will go watch a show or get something to eat all while this ad-view timer is running. I think it would produce inaccurate times and would need a serious buffer.

    Also, what would prevent fraud. Couldn’t someone just set their browser on the page and walk away with their computer set to never fall asleep?

  • pgomez51

    speaking of health, I beg leave to publicize my book: SECRETS TO LIVE MORE, AND WITH GOOD QUALITY

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DAGK2PE/ref=rdr_kindle_ext_tmb .

    Why live well, priceless.

  • Pingback: Jeff Jarvis: Engagement will matter more | ShopAdvisor Blog

  • Pingback: The newest New York Times — BuzzMachine

  • Pingback: Building trust in news — BuzzMachine