The old building block of journalism — the article — is proving to be inadequate in the current onslaught of news. I’ll argue here that the new building block is the topic.
The story was all we had before — it’s what would fit onto a newspaper page or into a broadcast show. But a discrete and serial series of articles over days cannot adequately cover the complex stories going on now nor can they properly inform the public. There’s too much repetition. Too little explanation. The knowledge is not cumulative. Each instance is necessarily shallow. And when more big stories come — as they have lately! — in scarce time and space and with scarce resources, each becomes even shallower. We never catch up, we never get smarter. Articles perpetuate a Ground Hog Day kind of journalism.
Talking this over with some smart folks over the last few days — in one set of conversations about newspapers and online technology and in another conversation with NPR’s David Folkenflik for a story he’ll air shortly — I came to see that we haven’t yet created the proper elemental unit of coverage of stories like these.
Six years ago, in an insightful essay, Blogger cocreator Meg Hourihan wrote that the elemental unit of online media was no longer the publication or section or page or story but the post. I think that’s right: countless grains of information, thought, or opinion, each with its own permanent link so it can become connected to something larger — carbon atoms adding up to earth.
But that alone won’t work as an organizing principle for informing a world. It is the underlying base from which we have to start. But we have to add more value atop that shifting beach.
We have many tools to work with now, first and foremost the link. The link can take us to more or less background, depending on how much each of us needs, and to original source material and to many perspectives.
The link becomes more important than the brand in news. I said to Folkenflik last night that I never would have thought to go to This American Life as a brand to find the best explanation of the credit crisis, but I did. (Its reporters are working furiously on a sequel for this week’s show.) Lots of people discovered that report and spread the word around — with the link. The link changes everything.
I think the new building block of journalism needs to be the topic. I don’t mean that in the context of news site topic pages, which are just catalogues of links built to kiss up to Google SEO. Those are merely collections of articles, and articles are inadequate.
Instead, I want a page, a site, a thing that is created, curated, edited, and discussed. It’s a blog that treats a topic as an ongoing and cumulative process of learning, digging, correcting, asking, answering. It’s also a wiki that keeps a snapshot of the latest knowledge and background. It’s an aggregator that provides annotated links to experts, coverage, opinion, perspective, source material. It’s a discussion that doesn’t just blather but that tries to accomplish something (an extension of an article like this one that asks what options there are to bailout a bailout). It’s collaborative and distributed and open but organized.
Think of it as being inside a beat reporter’s head, while also sitting at a table with all the experts who inform that reporter, as everyone there can hear and answer questions asked from the rest of the room — and in front of them all are links to more and ever-better information and understanding.
This is the way to cover stories and life.
It’ s not an article, a story, a section, a bureau, a paper, a show. We have to use the new tools we have at hand to create new structures for covering news and informing each other. As I said in the post below, old structures are crumbling and new structures will be built in their place. We need to create that something new now.
What do we call it? I don’t know. The topic table. The beat bliki (ouch). The news brain. We’ll know what to call it when we see it.
: LATER: See Steve Yelvington on community memory and what he’s building.
Here’s Folkenflik’s story.





Pingback: 09/30/2008 Writing Jobs and Links : PoeWar.com Writer’s Resource Center
Pingback: Squawking Tech » Blog Archive » Topics and the Future of Journalism
Pingback: New journalism: less story, more bloggy «
Pingback: Technolo-J : Is content still king?
Pingback: links for 2008-10-01 — contentious.com
Pingback: new_media_new_society » Blog Archive » news consumers vote for micro-personal news
Pingback: O artigo ou o tópico? : Ponto Media
Pingback: A soma e as partes | The sum and the parts « O Lago | The Lake
Pingback: The building blocks of news: topics and people too! « Network(ed)News
Pingback: Build the Echo » Blog Archive » links for 2008-10-02
Pingback: ¿Artículos o unidades de cobertura informativa? « opiniones
Pingback: Is the Article No Longer Enough? | PSFK - Trends, Ideas & Inspiration
Pingback: Not to overhype this, but … at Newsless.org
Pingback: 34. « Digital Breadcrumbs
Pingback: Links - 3rd October 2008 « Curiously Persistent
Pingback: RethinkingMedia » Blog Archive » “Het ‘artikel’ is niet langer de bouwsteen van de journalistiek”
Pingback: Articulation and Artiface « Digital Lantern
Pingback: Jon Stahl’s Journal » Blog Archive » links for 2008-10-03
Pingback: PR Barking Up the Wrong Tree « Public Relations Rogue
Pingback: Kataweb.it - Blog - Cablogrammi di Massimo Russo » Blog Archive » Un nuovo nome per ridefinire i giornali del futuro
Pingback: Del nuevo bloguerismo, por Jeff Jervis
Pingback: Rosa J.C. » Blog Archive » La nueva unidad periódistica
Pingback: Bliki (happy birthday) « ladoblehélice
Pingback: No Time To Think, And The Downfall Of Society | THESCRAPBOOK
Pingback: New News Part 2 « If not, toss it.
Pingback: El pilar del periodismo ya no es el artículo sino el tema (Jeff Jarvis, Buzz Machine, 30/9/08) : Centro de Estudios de Medios
Pingback: The New AP - Publishing 2.0
Pingback: The future newsroom? | fix journalism
Pingback: The New AP » Publish2 Blog
Pingback: Persistent stories — The end of the news periodical | Solution Journalism
Pingback: Blogroll » Links for 2008-10-09 [del.icio.us]
Pingback: Congruent Thoughts « C3 - Complete Community Connection
Pingback: A Photo Editor - Thoughts on Media - October 2008
Pingback: www.bastimmers.nl » Blog Archive » Diginews 47: topics als hoeksteen van een nieuwssite
Pingback: New Media Is Way More Than Just a Passing Fad in Marketing | Online PR technology trends | Sally Falkow | The Leading Edge
Pingback: lectroid.net » Blog Archive » Are newspapers doing it wrong?
Pingback: It’s a public convenience | Susan Crawford blog
Pingback: Teaching Online Journalism » Articles, comments, stories, conversations
Pingback: Something old,something new, something borrowed… « Julia McWatt’s Weblog
Pingback: ¿La nueva partícula fundamental del periodismo online? « Sextopiso
Pingback: La nueva unidad periodística « Blog de Rosa J.C.
Pingback: In praise of editors : Binary Law
Pingback: hburgnews.com » Thank you, Harrisonburg
Pingback: The power of positive blogging
Pingback: October 2008’s most-clicked posts to the link list: Data scraping, design experts, copy editors, killing the article, local. - Joe Think
Pingback: Introducing Jeff Jarvis « Sucrimson’s Blog
Pingback: BuzzMachine » A scenario for news
Pingback: A scenario for news (Jeff Jarvis, Buzz Machine, 24/11/08) : Centro de Estudios de Medios
Pingback: Is this the future of reporting the news online? « sean bradbury’s blog
Pingback: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » A complete ecology of news
Pingback: The Bush-Cheney Legacy | Megan Taylor: Web Journalist
Pingback: Eyes East » Blog Archive » Experts
Pingback: The self-fulfilling story « BuzzMachine
Pingback: laOtra TPA » El artículo ya no es la única forma…
Pingback: A few links for the end of the week
Pingback: Several thousand years of talking nonsense
Pingback: The New AP | Global News Tonight
Pingback: The New AP | GetAnswers.ws
Pingback: High-speed conection « google said
Pingback: Technolo-j » Blog Archive » Is content still king?
Pingback: NewBizNews & Hyperpersonal news streams « BuzzMachine
Pingback: Because you wouldn’t go to a *citizen prostitute* for sex, would you? | brianfrank.ca
Pingback: Revolutions in the media economy (2) – the changing structure of information | David Campbell -- Photography, Multimedia, Politics
Pingback: The death of the story
Pingback: Helping news be news « BuzzMachine
Pingback: Google News: Helping News Be News | Media and Tech
Pingback: Poynter’s hiring. What will their writer/curator be up to? » Nieman Journalism Lab
Pingback: The new era of digital news publication (answers the question: what is a journalist programmer?) – The journalist programmer
Pingback: The New AP « Matic
Pingback: Already History « KILL YOUR NEWSPAPER
Pingback: Napier Demo Website » Blog Archive » The 1000th post – European electronics media wishlist
Pingback: L’article n’est plus la pierre angulaire du journalisme « narvic's lab
Pingback: Lemonde.fr et lepost.fr se mettent au journalisme de liens « narvic's lab
Pingback: Moving beyond the article
Pingback: The Molecules of News « (Re)Structuring Journalism
Pingback: Mediactive » A Story is Never Finished; Neither, Maybe, is a Book
Pingback: Media Companies Must Become Trusted Data Hubs Catering to the Trust Market » Article » OWNI.eu, Digital Journalism
Pingback: Voices: News organizations must become hubs of trusted data in an market seeking (and valuing) trust » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism
Pingback: Scarlatti » Blog Archive » Ins Getümmel!
Pingback: De cómo los grandes seriales deberían tener su blog en el periódico
Pingback: I want to get engaged | It's the soup…