I think I’ve been thinking about hyperlocal the wrong way. Like most everyone else chasing this golden fleece, I’ve defined it as content, news, a product, listings, data, software, sites, ads. It’s not. Local is people: who knows what, who knows whom, who’s doing what (and, yes, who’s doing whom). The question should be — in Mark Zuckerberg’s famous-if-I-have-anything-to-do-about-it phrase — how we bring them elegant organization. They already are a community, already doing what they want to do, already knowing stuff. How can we help them do that better?
Local is people. Our job is not to deliver content or a product. Our job is to help them make connections with information and each other.
In truth, that was, long ago, the job newspapers saw for themselves. That’s why they lived to get as many names in the paper as possible. They knew: Local is people. Newspapers gave us news that mattered to us and would be trivial to anyone else. Newspapers were small and local and served their communities — and their advertisers — better. This is very close to the real mission of a newspaper, a mission we have lost as they got bigger and more egotistical and more powerful, as they become one-size-fits-all monopolies. Except today we have new tools (and new competitors). No one can or should do it all anymore. We need to help people do it themselves. Yes, themselves.
I’m not suggesting that hyperlocal is just a social networking tool. Or just a forum. Or just a bunch of blogs. Or just a listings tool. Or just a search engine. Or just a news site. It needs to end up being all those things and more. And as I said the other day, this will not happen in one place, on one site, but will be distributed across wherever people are being people and communities communities, locally. The trick, once more, is to organize it all. Elegantly.
And this will not happen all on its own. It needs investment, motivation, leadership, shared and distributed ownership.
What exactly does this look like? I’m not sure yet. I’m working on that. But I’m getting a better idea, I think, by working from a new starting point: People, not content. People, not data. People, not software. Long ago, when I launched the GoSkokie project at Northwestern’s Medill, I told the students that towns know things I wanted them to figure out how to tap that keg of knowledge. They got partway there with (which was a model for Backfence, by the way), but that was only partway.
I now believe that he who figures out how to help people organize themselves — letting them connect with each other and with what they all know — will end up with news, listings, reviews, data, gossip, and more as byproducts.
Thoughts from the beach. Stay tuned.





Pingback: Pulse Development Blog » Blog Archive » Hyperlocal and The Pulse
Pingback: The power of the humble hyperlink » mathewingram.com/media
Pingback: Nick Anstead » links for 2007-07-12
Pingback: Magnetbox - links for 2007-07-13
Pingback: links for 2007-07-13 « David Black
Pingback: Open Parenthesis
Pingback: JAYFALLON.NET » Blog Archive » The Social: July 12th
Pingback: Washington Post's LoudounExtra.com Isn't Yet Hyperlocal Enough » Publishing 2.0
Pingback: You can't own conversation by andydickinson.net
Pingback: Aggregate Them This Way, That Way, Your Way, My Way « Network(ed)News
Pingback: links for 2007-07-23 at Framtider.net
Pingback: lotusmedia 2.0
Pingback: News Graph? « Network(ed)News
Pingback: Breaking Content, Building Conversation « Network(ed)News
Pingback: Global/Local Cultures and Communities | The rise of the local and hyperlocal communities online | « Compassion in Politics
Pingback: newsroomnext » EveryBlock.com: Game-changing new player in hyperlocal; hyperridiculous video
Pingback: Hyperlocal: links « Short Stories
Pingback: agentgenius.com- national real estate opinion column » Blog Archive » How Local Should You Go?
Pingback: Jeffrey A. Haines’ Blog » Blog Archive » Regionalism is still the future
Pingback: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » A scenario for news
Pingback: Jeff Jarvis: O futuro do jornalismo | The future of news « O Lago | The Lake
Pingback: A scenario for news (Jeff Jarvis, Buzz Machine, 24/11/08) : Centro de Estudios de Medios
Pingback: El nuevo escenario informativo (Jeff Jarvis, 24/11/08) : Centro de Estudios de Medios
Pingback: How journalists can use Facebook « Save the Media
Pingback: Ein Zukunftsszenario für den Lokaljournalismus « BAYARTZ-Blog
Pingback: A New Ukrainian Adventure in New Media (Continued) « Adventures in Media Development
Pingback: MediaNext: A New Ukrainian Adventure in New Media (continued) | The Morningside Post
Pingback: Hyperlocal news: a definition « Christopher Wink
Pingback: MediaNext: A New Ukrainian Adventure in New Media (Continued)