The bastards don’t stop

The bastards don’t stop

: Iraqi terrorists (the Times calls them merely militants) kidnap “six more hostages — three Indians, two Kenyans and an Egyptian — and would behead them if their countries did not immediately announce the withdrawal of their citizens from Iraq.”

  • http://sharpmarbles.stufftoread.com Sharp as a Marble

    Why complain? It’s apparently an effective way of getting results.

  • p

    They can’t force out soldiers that are not even there..
    “”None of the countries are part of the 160,000-member coalition force in Iraq, however Interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi appealed last week to India and Egypt to join the coalition and send troops.””
    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040721/D83VB1L01.html

  • caramba

    $6M payoff on the philipino is quite the incentive not to stop –

  • Kat

    Yeah, and those muslims collect beheaded heads like we civilized folk collect deer heads.
    They just store them in a freezer till they get them taxidermied. What a sick bunch of subhumans.

  • shark

    Hey, these are stuopid terrorists seeing as those countries don’t have troops in Iraq. But who can blame them for trying? It works on Spain and the Phillipines

  • Michael

    Two points:
    1. What WOULDN’T you do to oust a foreign power that was occupying the United States? (I don’t know about anyone else, but the things I would do would make the things happening in Iraq look tame and timid.)
    2. Our closest Arab ally Saudi Arabia beheads in public more than 300 people per year.

  • Kat

    Michael–so what should we do to all the muslim terrorists occupying the USA waiting for osama’s call? Should we behead all the bastards? I do wish we’d caused 19 of them to die a painful slow death, prior to 911.

  • Ptolemy

    Kat has a point Michael. I think you’d be kissing the ass of our invaders and saying we deserved it for past policies. Yet you want to pretend you’d be man enough to fight for your country when you don’t even want to fight the enemy now.

  • http://daysofleisure.com jim

    “Militants” seems like a reasonable term. “Terrorists” has a different meaning, unless one uses the term broadly to mean any violent force, organized or not, not part of a recognized government. “Terrorists” also has a political meaning in the current US government’s agenda. There have to be “terrorists” so we can have the “War on Terror”.

  • Kat

    Militants, my ass–it was terrorists who blew up WTC1 and terrorists who blew up WTC2 and terrorists who blew up the USS Cole and frigging islamic terrorists who are killing people on every damned continent on earth, save Antarctica. It is islamic terrorists who want to create a islamin craphole wherever they infiltrate their sick ideology. It was terrorists who kept a trophy head in their freezer. It is terrorists in Iraq afraid of having a sharialess state so they murder everyone who stands in their way–like they do in Israel, Ambon, Sudan, Nigeria.. Screw allah and your militants.

  • Michael

    Kat:
    Your pretty militant yourself — which is dangerous, because you don’t sound too rational. When you say “muslim terrorists occupying the USA waiting for osama’s call,” whom precisely are you referring to? I wasn’t aware the U.S. was currently occupied by foreign invaders. You may legitimately be suffering from some kind of paranoid psychosis.

  • Michael

    ptolemy:

  • Kat

    Michael,you are the irrational one here, willing to blame everyone but the islamic murderers.
    There are plenty of muslamics occupying the USA, pretending to be citizens, building mosques, waiting for Osama.

  • Michael

    Kat:
    Would it be irrational for me to ask how you know “There are plenty of muslamics occupying the USA, pretending to be citizens, building mosques, waiting for Osama”?

  • Michael

    Kat:
    Would it also be irrational for me to ask why you say that I’m “willing to blame everyone but the islamic murderers”?
    To be precise:
    1) Who’s “everyone”?
    2) Which “islamic murderers”?
    3) What is the “blame” for?

  • Ptolemy

    I wonder if you could answer your own 3 point test out loud Michael. There are terroists running around Iraq at this moment murdering no one but Iraqis with car bombs. What is your excuse for them now? Its not Americans being killed with these tacticts. Do you still empathize with them? Do the Iraqis deserve what is happening to them now? I don’t you don’t think they deserve liberation, but do you think they deserve the present treatment at the hands of “militants”? What are the militants standing for now if not destroying the dreams of Iraqis trying to overcome the upheavel they’ve just been through. Yet no bitter hateful posts on those “militants”. No, all your hate is reserved for Americans.